Started By
Message

re: UGA/Alabama Vs Common Opponents (spin off)

Posted on 11/26/23 at 10:59 am to
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33165 posts
Posted on 11/26/23 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Bama with healthy wide receivers was clearly better than UGA. Bama without them clearly was not. I


Be thankful for all of the key uga guys out while your wrs were healthy, or you wouldn’t even be able to make that first statement
Posted by BamaBravesPackers
Member since Nov 2021
2665 posts
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:18 am to
quote:

or you wouldn’t even be able to make that first statement


At risk of derailing again, UGA fans keep saying this…with literally nothing to base it on. No one knows what happens if both teams were fully healthy, or if the missing UGA players were enough to make up the large gap shown in the SECCG and first quarter of the NC (not to mention the other missing Bama starters…think one was a star defender). Everyone knows what happens based on my statement…we literally had almost 100 minutes of football that proved it in front of the whole country.

Guess UGA fans just got so used to living in hypotheticals and hopes/dreams from 1980-2020 that they forgot the game has to be played on the field, not on paper. Otherwise, why even play on Sat?
This post was edited on 11/26/23 at 11:20 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter