Started By
Message
re: Which Expansion was Less of a Fit: Ark/SCAR, Aggie/Mizzou, or OU/TX?
Posted on 6/1/23 at 2:09 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
Posted on 6/1/23 at 2:09 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
quote:
And if Texas football is a joke, then Arkansas obviously is too. Unfortunately you've had the benefit of being in the SEC for 30 years and are still a joke.
But here’s the real issue. Yes, Arkansas struggles compared to the rest of the conference in football and probably always will, I’ll admit it. The embarrassing thing is that Texas struggles and shouldn’t. There is no comparison in money and resources between the two. Arkansas does the best with what it has for the most part but Texas Waaay under achieves.
1
Posted on 6/1/23 at 2:16 pm to Criticalmass
Growing up in Little Rock, I thought Arkansas was more Southwestern, along with Texas and Oklahoma. Missouri was more like Big Ten country than SEC, outside of the bootheel. Southwest Little Rock was more Southern, along with everything Southeast of it.
Today it's all different. Missouri, Oklahoma and Arkansas all seem Southern. Texas has some Southern influence, but I'd say that it's the most different today, rather than Missouri.
Today it's all different. Missouri, Oklahoma and Arkansas all seem Southern. Texas has some Southern influence, but I'd say that it's the most different today, rather than Missouri.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News