Started By
Message
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:28 am to jangalang
Not the culture HF is trying to install. JH has hurt his team and possibly risked his career showing poor choices and total disrespect for women. At minimum these two are now in the dog house with HF. But worst case, he could be permanently suspended ir have to miss a certain number of games. Not a leader.
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:40 am to jangalang
Lets look at the actual law. (He should still be suspended for stupidity. The person posting on Twitter could be in legal trouble because they were harassing Jarquez.
LINK
The defendant is charged with distributing a private image.
A person commits the crime of distributing a private image if he/she knowingly posts, emails, texts, transmits, or otherwise distributes a private image with the intent to harass, threaten, coerce, or intimidate the person depicted when the depicted person has not consented to the transmission and the depicted person has a reasonable expectation of privacy against transmission of the private image.
To convict, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements:
(1) The defendant posted, emailed, texted, transmitted, or otherwise distributed a private image of [insert name of person depicted];
(2) The defendant did so with the intent to harass, threaten, coerce, or intimidate the person depicted;
(3) The depicted person had not consented to the transmission of the private image;
(4) The depicted person had a reasonable expectation of privacy against transmission of the private image; (AND)
(5) The defendant did so knowingly.
LINK
The defendant is charged with distributing a private image.
A person commits the crime of distributing a private image if he/she knowingly posts, emails, texts, transmits, or otherwise distributes a private image with the intent to harass, threaten, coerce, or intimidate the person depicted when the depicted person has not consented to the transmission and the depicted person has a reasonable expectation of privacy against transmission of the private image.
To convict, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements:
(1) The defendant posted, emailed, texted, transmitted, or otherwise distributed a private image of [insert name of person depicted];
(2) The defendant did so with the intent to harass, threaten, coerce, or intimidate the person depicted;
(3) The depicted person had not consented to the transmission of the private image;
(4) The depicted person had a reasonable expectation of privacy against transmission of the private image; (AND)
(5) The defendant did so knowingly.
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)