Started By
Message
re: I was against more than 4 team playoff...
Posted on 1/1/23 at 11:47 am to RTRinTampa
Posted on 1/1/23 at 11:47 am to RTRinTampa
quote:
I was against more than 4 team playoff...
My optimal playoff was a 6 teamer with the top two seeds getting a bye” to reward them. I think 6 is plenty and is demonstrably plenty most years. This year would have had Alabama and Tennessee in, as it appears should be warranted, and the two undefeated teams would have received byes. You also stand a good chance at getting most the conferences in with a rep and don’t water things down too much at 6.
This post was edited on 1/1/23 at 11:49 am
1
Posted on 1/1/23 at 1:19 pm to Crimson1st
quote:
My optimal playoff was a 6 teamer with the top two seeds getting a bye” to reward them. I think 6 is plenty and is demonstrably plenty most years. This year would have had Alabama and Tennessee in, as it appears should be warranted, and the two undefeated teams would have received byes. You also stand a good chance at getting most the conferences in with a rep and don’t water things down too much at 6.
Problem with your logic. They have already demonstrated that with an expanded playoff they would want to put the P5 champions and 1 G5 team, so Alabama and Tennessee would still not make a 6 team playoff.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News