Started By
Message

re: Harrison Hit

Posted on 1/1/23 at 2:12 pm to
Posted by DawginSC
Member since Aug 2022
4686 posts
Posted on 1/1/23 at 2:12 pm to
You're just incorrect about this.

I get you won't change your mind, but you're not seeing what's really there. It's in your head.
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
8727 posts
Posted on 1/1/23 at 3:19 pm to
No, you won’t change my mind. My interpretation is that it was targeting by the letter of the law. He did launch, he did make forcible contact to the head and neck. Maybe he didn’t mean to, but the rule says nothing about that. There are others on here that say it is targeting too. Many say it wasn’t. And that is the problem with the rule, it is all a personal judgement. I stand by the statement that if this had been called in an out of conference game in September, it would have probably stood. And that is another issue. Enforcement of it definitely seems to be influenced by how big the game is.

The OP asked for non-biased opinions. Mine is that it was by rule targeting.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter