Started By
Message

re: UMass player that got smoked says A&M Commandant is lying

Posted on 11/20/22 at 5:46 pm to
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19163 posts
Posted on 11/20/22 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

There is a huge difference actually.


Nice deflection, but there is no difference when it comes to firearms safety. You always assume the weapon is loaded and treat it accordingly. That means you don’t point it at people and you certainly don’t discharge it when you are aware of people down range. The cannon should have never been fired. It doesn’t matter if you warned them. It doesn’t matter if the timing of its firing is important to a ceremony. Safety comes first. If you’re “tradition” trumps safety, then your cannons need to be banned by the league. It’s beyond ridiculous that you guys continue to defend this idiocy.
Posted by Krampus
Member since Nov 2018
5207 posts
Posted on 11/20/22 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

Nice deflection, but there is no difference when it comes to firearms safety. You always assume the weapon is loaded and treat it accordingly. That means you don’t point it at people and you certainly don’t discharge it when you are aware of people down range. The cannon should have never been fired. It doesn’t matter if you warned them. It doesn’t matter if the timing of its firing is important to a ceremony. Safety comes first. If you’re “tradition” trumps safety, then your cannons need to be banned by the league. It’s beyond ridiculous that you guys continue to defend this idiocy.


Bruh, read my posts in the thread. I defend nothing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter