Started By
Message
O-Line Blocking Scheme Change
Posted on 10/2/22 at 7:55 am
Posted on 10/2/22 at 7:55 am
Can someone who knows what they are talking about explain our scheme change for the o line? Cole cubelic mentioned it and Kirby did too during the post game presser.
They said we switched to a gap scheme after the first half to help the o line. What were we in before that? Man to man? Is a gap scheme similar to a zone blocking scheme? Why wouldn't we just run that scheme all the time? Isn't that what the shananhans made their money with?
Is it just a case of we think our lineman should win 1v1s and we're too proud to run a zone scheme? What's the advantage of a man to man scheme vs zone? Does it allow something a zone wouldn't?
They said we switched to a gap scheme after the first half to help the o line. What were we in before that? Man to man? Is a gap scheme similar to a zone blocking scheme? Why wouldn't we just run that scheme all the time? Isn't that what the shananhans made their money with?
Is it just a case of we think our lineman should win 1v1s and we're too proud to run a zone scheme? What's the advantage of a man to man scheme vs zone? Does it allow something a zone wouldn't?
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:20 am to K9
The aforementioned Brooks Austin will probably do a breakdown of this soon. It’s almost too much to put into a single post. In short, zone requires slightly quicker linemen to get their head across to make certain blocks. Gap uses more natural lanes and assignments. More of you block the man closest to you and communicate that pre snap. There’s A LOT more to it though. It affects play action pass pro as well because now your run fakes look different.
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:25 am to K9
You only use gap scheme when you’re giving up penetration by the defensive front. Mizzou’s defensive front were making penetration into our backfield almost every play. Going in, apparently we schemed to not allow that. In short, it’s like a screen but with a run.
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:36 am to claydawg09
So gap scheme does not equal zone scheme?
And what was our scheme before the switch? Man to man?
And what was our scheme before the switch? Man to man?
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:37 am to GADAWG2017
quote:
In short, it’s like a screen but with a run.
Interesting.
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:41 am to K9
While not the law, an easy way to think of it is if you see a guard pull, it’s more than likely gap. Gap uses where the DL is against him.
If I’m a guard and DL is to my left, I kick him left. If he’s to my right, I kick him to the right. If he’s truly head up and not shading at all, I get my head to the inside or outside of him, depending on run lane design.
Edited to add: I’m glad we switched and need to keep it that way for now. Our guards are not quick. They struggle pulling and getting heads across in zone. We are more built for power and gap, but we run zone a lot.
If I’m a guard and DL is to my left, I kick him left. If he’s to my right, I kick him to the right. If he’s truly head up and not shading at all, I get my head to the inside or outside of him, depending on run lane design.
Edited to add: I’m glad we switched and need to keep it that way for now. Our guards are not quick. They struggle pulling and getting heads across in zone. We are more built for power and gap, but we run zone a lot.
This post was edited on 10/2/22 at 8:43 am
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:44 am to CBBDawg316
Wow, thanks, that had some great info.
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:46 am to claydawg09
Ah so our normal scheme is zone? And we switched to a gap style? .
Thanks for the info!
Thanks for the info!
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:55 am to K9
It should also be noted that when we went to power, tight split, we did pretty well. Earlier in the game, I noticed a number of plain whiffs by our Oline, like our guys were getting beat to the point of attack. In live action, it looked like Missouri was getting off blocks, but in many cases, our guys were not in the right spot and were olaying them. (Think a bull fighter)
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:59 am to CBBDawg316
quote:
“The ball carrier’s decision making is more straightforward on gap scheme runs. He isn’t asked to to make multiple reads to find the crease, but rather display patience to set up and maximize the blockers in front of him. Ideally the back stays close behind his puller in order to force a defender to pick a side, which the back can cut up off of.
Where zone blocking concepts were designed to avoid losses behind the line of scrimmage, gap blocking is geared around creating a numbers advantage at the point of attack. If everything goes as planned and the players execute, the offense gains a numbers advantage towards the playside and the ball carrier finds himself running free into the second or even third level.
Gap blocking is also especially useful in situations where there are extra defenders along the line of scrimmage, as this creates easy down blocks. This is why you’ll so often see it utilized around the endzone. One reason I believe gap concepts are going to be on the rise around the NFL is it’s a natural counter to the Tite front defenses are incorporating more and more to combat the spread passing games.
Beyond the actual coaching points for each individual concept, there’s a couple of fundamental differences between gap and zone blocking that are worth closing with.
First and foremost is how the concepts work philosophically. Zone runs work around the idea that the back will be like water, finding a hole where the defense isn’t. Gap runs have a hole in mind before the ball is snapped and depends on the offense imposing their design upon the defense.
The second difference is how each scheme creates leverage on a defender. Zone asks the blockers to step in unison and work in tandem to overtake and wall off defenders while each lineman runs along their track. Gap asks lineman to block down the line of scrimmage from their initial starting spot and away from the hole, as this creates an advantage from the jump.”
Maybe I’m wrong, but could our problem be that our backs are bad at decision making and need to know where the hole is going to be ahead of time? This would explain why switching to gap scheme worked.
This post was edited on 10/2/22 at 9:00 am
Posted on 10/2/22 at 9:05 am to FlexDawg
Based on what I saw, it was our lineman missing blocks and allowing penetration.
Posted on 10/2/22 at 12:13 pm to claydawg09
I think searels is more of a gap man. Am I right?
Posted on 10/2/22 at 2:32 pm to AlaCowboy
quote:he is
think searels is more of a gap man. Am I right?
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
3






