re: NCAA Enforcement Begins Attempted NIL Crackdown With Miami Inquiry

quote:

---

But going even further, why did you ignore the sentence after the one you put in bold letters? That is where boosters come in.

---

I didn't. In fact about 2/3 of my post addressed it directly:

quote:

---

Boosters can give prospective recruits anything they can otherwise give currently enrolled student athletes, as long as the deal isn't strictured in such a way as to be dependant upon the recruit's eventual enrollment in the school.

As long as thr booster is ok with throwing money at the recruit, and not getting it back if they decide to sign with another school, it's all good.

---

If the booster makes the deal in such a way as to make it dependent on the recruits enrollment with a particular school, that's a violation.

If the booster promises more deals if the recruit signs with a particular school, that's a violation.

As long as the booster makes a deal with the recruit that does not depend in any way on the recruit eventually signing with the booster's school, or promising any future deals dependant upon signing woth said school, there is no violation.

If the recruits assumes there will be future deals if they enroll in a particular school, that's on them. No violation.

Boosters can wine and dine recruits all they want as long as they don't make anything officially dependant on the recruit eventually signing on the dotted line.