quote:
I am good with 0-8 and having no permanent opponents, so everyone plays everyone the same amount of times over a number of years.

You can't get much more fair than that.

Again, where is this massive push coming from to be "fair" and equitable regarindg number of time syou play someone? If us playing UF and AU every single year means we get to play missouri and oklahoma less often then who the frick cares. Why are we valuing those games over our traiditonal ones?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by bigDgator

Dallas, TX

Member since Oct 2008

41732 posts

Posted on 6/9/22 at 2:55 pm to WG_Dawg

quote:
are you saying that's a good thing? It's not just any other game and shouldn't be treated as one

No I am not in favor of it.

I just know that we have lost the Auburn rivalry, and now we stand a chance to lose the Tennessee and LSU rivalries. So if Georgia decides to play in Athens when they are designated the home team, I would be in favor of just eliminating all permanent opponents. If some people get to keep their rivals and others do not, it doesn't sound fair to me.

We have played Auburn once since 2011 and it is bullshite. It will be the same with Tennessee and LSU, and I am just kind of over it. Florida has as many if not more rivals than anyone. We have already lost the annual Miami and Auburn rivalries to SEC expansion, and now we stand a chance to lose even more, so let's just start over from scratch.

This post was edited on 6/9/22 at 2:57 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by djsdawg

Member since Apr 2015

33075 posts

Posted on 6/9/22 at 3:02 pm to WG_Dawg

quote:
If us playing UF and AU every single year means we get to play missouri and oklahoma less often then who the frick cares. Why are we valuing those games over our traiditonal ones?

Exactly, which is why we might as well stay at 2/6. 1/7 serves no tangible benefit like a switch to 3/6 would.

0 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board