Started By
Message
re: NIL or Transfer Portal.. Which one is worse for college football??
Posted on 6/8/22 at 4:36 pm to RammerJammer28
Posted on 6/8/22 at 4:36 pm to RammerJammer28
Both.
Both are terrible.
It would be different if the NIL had a cap and everyone (each college) was capable of offering the same NIL amount per player, but it’s not like that.
The transfer portal brings about tampering (Tank Bigsby, for example) because anyone can transfer immediately.
The two combined are bad because the “successful” schools can offer crazy NIL deals to big-time players at other schools, AKA tampering, and steal them away.
College football free agency without any college having a true cap.
It sucks.
Both are terrible.
It would be different if the NIL had a cap and everyone (each college) was capable of offering the same NIL amount per player, but it’s not like that.
The transfer portal brings about tampering (Tank Bigsby, for example) because anyone can transfer immediately.
The two combined are bad because the “successful” schools can offer crazy NIL deals to big-time players at other schools, AKA tampering, and steal them away.
College football free agency without any college having a true cap.
It sucks.
1
Posted on 6/9/22 at 11:43 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
Both.
Both are terrible.
It would be different if the NIL had a cap and everyone (each college) was capable of offering the same NIL amount per player, but it’s not like that.
The transfer portal brings about tampering (Tank Bigsby, for example) because anyone can transfer immediately.
The two combined are bad because the “successful” schools can offer crazy NIL deals to big-time players at other schools, AKA tampering, and steal them away.
College football free agency without any college having a true cap.
It sucks.
Well thanks for the under the table deals all those years that kept weaker schools down! I like this and it opens up competitive all around.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News