Started By
Message
re: 1-7 scheduling model gaining momentum per SI’s Ross Dellinger
Posted on 6/6/22 at 12:41 pm to gamecockman12
Posted on 6/6/22 at 12:41 pm to gamecockman12
quote:
To be fair not many people outside of Alabama or Tennessee are interested in that game at all.
Hereinlies the issue I think a lot of us have. Why should it matter if fans of other schools don't care about the games that are important to the fan bases involved?
Posted on 6/6/22 at 12:42 pm to lsufball19
What schools are the strongest supporters of the 1-7 model?
That would be interesting to know…
That would be interesting to know…
Posted on 6/6/22 at 12:43 pm to lsufball19
quote:
To be fair not many people outside of Alabama or Tennessee are interested in that game at all.
Hereinlies the issue I think a lot of us have. Why should it matter if fans of other schools don't care about the games that are important to the fan bases involved?
My take has always been if the two teams want to play, let them do it. For instance, on this site, it appears many LSU and Florida fans want to keep that annual tilt. So I say let 'em play.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 12:46 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Hereinlies the issue I think a lot of us have. Why should it matter if fans of other schools don't care about the games that are important to the fan bases involved?
Because no matter what solution they come up with, there is going to be fanbases that aren't happy with it. I personally think the 3-6 model is better, even if it is tougher on my school with having Clemson as an annual opponent.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)