Started By
Message

re: 1-7 scheduling model gaining momentum per SI’s Ross Dellinger

Posted on 6/6/22 at 12:41 pm to
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65529 posts
Posted on 6/6/22 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

To be fair not many people outside of Alabama or Tennessee are interested in that game at all.

Hereinlies the issue I think a lot of us have. Why should it matter if fans of other schools don't care about the games that are important to the fan bases involved?
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29788 posts
Posted on 6/6/22 at 12:42 pm to
What schools are the strongest supporters of the 1-7 model?

That would be interesting to know…
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
26663 posts
Posted on 6/6/22 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

To be fair not many people outside of Alabama or Tennessee are interested in that game at all.

Hereinlies the issue I think a lot of us have. Why should it matter if fans of other schools don't care about the games that are important to the fan bases involved?


My take has always been if the two teams want to play, let them do it. For instance, on this site, it appears many LSU and Florida fans want to keep that annual tilt. So I say let 'em play.
Posted by gamecockman12
Columbia, SC
Member since Aug 2012
6109 posts
Posted on 6/6/22 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Hereinlies the issue I think a lot of us have. Why should it matter if fans of other schools don't care about the games that are important to the fan bases involved?


Because no matter what solution they come up with, there is going to be fanbases that aren't happy with it. I personally think the 3-6 model is better, even if it is tougher on my school with having Clemson as an annual opponent.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter