Started By
Message
re: 1-7 scheduling model gaining momentum per SI’s Ross Dellinger
Posted on 6/6/22 at 11:06 am to Tornado Alley
Posted on 6/6/22 at 11:06 am to Tornado Alley
Why can’t those games be played OOC? Serious question.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 11:09 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Why can’t those games be played OOC? Serious question.
The next decade Alabama and Georgia (and I'm sure others will) have set up great OOC schedules with 2-3 interesting P5 opponents every season.
So now we're gonna have to drop 1 of those for a usual game or play 11 or 12 P5 opponents? It's just stupid. There's no reason to do this. There plenty of alternatives that vastly improve the regularity of games between everyone in the league without destroying games that 1/3 of the conferences programs have cared about for 100+ years.
It would be one thing if it was this or nothing. But that's not the situation.
This post was edited on 6/6/22 at 11:10 am
Posted on 6/6/22 at 11:09 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Why can’t those games be played OOC? Serious question.
They can be treated as OOC games, but I wonder how that works in practice. So they'd be OOC except in years where they fall on the rotation? Seems dumb to me
Not to mention, creating that will cause a big problem in marquee OOC games already on our schedules.
I've said it before, but this continued expansion is/was dumb. Conferences don't need to be this big
This post was edited on 6/6/22 at 11:10 am
Posted on 6/6/22 at 2:59 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Why can’t those games be played OOC? Serious question.
Because they are CONFERERNCE games and should be played as such. Not a meaningless game that has no effect on the conference. It needs to have an impact on the SEC.
Posted on 6/7/22 at 12:57 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Why can't an SEC rivalry against an SEC team be played yearly?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)