Started By
Message
re: If the SEC goes to the 3-6 scheduling option, which 3 permanent opponents should we face?
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:41 am to thekid
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:41 am to thekid
Is a Bama alum still in charge of this? If so, you don't want this. LSU, Auburn, UF, and UGA would all get the short end while Bama would get the easiest schedule, and it wouldn't be close.
We saw this happen with the bridge scheduling BS a decade ago.
We saw this happen with the bridge scheduling BS a decade ago.
2
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:50 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
Is a Bama alum still in charge of this? If so, you don't want this. LSU, Auburn, UF, and UGA would all get the short end while Bama would get the easiest schedule, and it wouldn't be close.
You guys aren’t keeping up. Dellenger had the article this morning. Every “Big 8” team would play two Big 8 permanents and one “Little 8” permanent. The little guys get two of each other and one Big Boy.
In the current model, Tennessee is a Little 8 (A&M has their place with the Big Big Boys) so Bama’s permanents would be Auburn, LSU, and Tennessee.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 10:06 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
Hopefully Bama keeps LSU. Historically an easy win as well as in the last decade.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News