Started By
Message

re: As the Bonfire Burns™

Posted on 5/11/22 at 1:06 pm to
Posted by Hugh McElroy
Member since Sep 2013
17762 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 1:06 pm to
I could see players suing even if they just sanctioned A&M, on the grounds that the NCAA hurt their future employment prospects. If the NCAA tries to sanction a school for actions done by its boosters while not sanctioning other schools even when their boosters have publicly acknowledged the same actions, there will be litigation, unless the school and the NCAA settle on some penalty. But I don’t see any reason for a school to settle.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84954 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

I could see players suing even if they just sanctioned A&M


They wouldn’t have standing as long as they were free to transfer.

The punishment wouldn’t be for NIL, it would be for using NIL as an inducement to sign.
This post was edited on 5/11/22 at 1:08 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter