Started By
Message
2
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:28 am to AUCE05
quote:
But We would not be "settling" for Clark. He has a huge upside
Of course we would be; A proven guy at the position vs. an unproven guy.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:29 am to Weagle25
I would take Bill Clark #2, but Will Muschamp is the overwhelming #1.
I personally think Gus Malzahn is all in for Will Muschamp. It's the reason he fired Ellis Johnson when he did, IMO. And it's the reason he isn't taking his typical fast approach to hiring coaches in vacant spots.
I personally think Gus Malzahn is all in for Will Muschamp. It's the reason he fired Ellis Johnson when he did, IMO. And it's the reason he isn't taking his typical fast approach to hiring coaches in vacant spots.
This post was edited on 12/3/14 at 10:32 am
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:30 am to Weagle25
quote:I didn't read the word only in 05's post when I said that.
And you said agreed
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:31 am to AUCE05
quote:
WM is everyone's first choice. But We would not be "settling" for Clark.
Yes we would. Clark hasn't even coached on an SEC level. Muschamp has been doing it for many years and has been successful at it.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:33 am to Weagle25
Bird asked for an opinion on Clark. If you disagree, then answer him since you are an expert on the subject.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:33 am to AUCE05
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:34 am to ellitor
I will say this. I hope we can seal Boom up Auburnfast so we can steal T-Rob from UF before they finalize Mcelwain and try to seal T-Rob there.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:37 am to TTsTowel
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:40 am to ellitor
quote:
I will say this. I hope we can seal Boom up Auburnfast so we can steal T-Rob from UF before they finalize Mcelwain and try to seal T-Rob there.
Yes, that would be awesome.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:40 am to AUCE05
quote:
Bird asked for an opinion on Clark. If you disagree, then answer him since you are an expert on the subject.
You made the statement before that. I disagreed with it. Sorry if that upsets you.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:43 am to Weagle25
No I didn't. I said I would be happy with Clark. Nothing about WM.
ETA:
I did say WM only beats him in recruiting. But my other posts were responding to Bird. And I want WM as our DC, too. I was just pointing out the positives of Clark, and he is a better option than everyone else not named WM.
ETA:
I did say WM only beats him in recruiting. But my other posts were responding to Bird. And I want WM as our DC, too. I was just pointing out the positives of Clark, and he is a better option than everyone else not named WM.
This post was edited on 12/3/14 at 10:48 am
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:47 am to Weagle25
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:50 am to AUCE05
quote:
I did say WM only beats him in recruiting.
The post I was responding to.
quote:
I was just pointing out the positives of Clark
No problem with that.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:57 am to Weagle25
PM just said if Muschamp doesn't come then Odom is in strong position and Clark could be a significant player.
That makes it sound like
1. Muschamp
2. Odom
3. Clark
Or maybe I'm reading too much into the phrasing
That makes it sound like
1. Muschamp
2. Odom
3. Clark
Or maybe I'm reading too much into the phrasing
Posted on 12/3/14 at 11:10 am to Weagle25
Something to keep in mind. Jimmy Sexton, in the last few days, signed Odom as a new client. Wouldn't be surprised if Sexton is floating Odom's name as an AU candidate just to build his stock.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 11:10 am to Weagle25
quote:Does anyone know anything about this guy, other than that he coaches defense at Memphis?
2. Odom
Seems like it would be a huge letdown if we ended up with him...
Posted on 12/3/14 at 11:15 am to TTsTowel
quote:Apparently he's done very well statistically at Memphis recently. I'm not going to research to verify that though.
Does anyone know anything about this guy, other than that he coaches defense at Memphis?
Posted on 12/3/14 at 11:16 am to Weagle25
quote:JGT just made that his hot board order also.
PM just said if Muschamp doesn't come then Odom is in strong position and Clark could be a significant player.
That makes it sound like
1. Muschamp
2. Odom
3. Clark
Or maybe I'm reading too much into the phrasing
Posted on 12/3/14 at 11:17 am to TTsTowel
He's spent 9 years as an assistant in some capacity on Mizzou's staff. Which also happens to be his alma mater. That's all I know
Page 19 of 169
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News