Started By
Message
re: Hugh Freeze says fan expectations are ridiculous
Posted on 9/28/23 at 6:35 am to jangalang
Posted on 9/28/23 at 6:35 am to jangalang
quote:
But did I? You literally brought up dead pops. The heavy emotions that yall displayed is exactly what im right about.
Morning Jang. Malt and co. need some help on tRant shite-talking dawg fans.
Hey, no need to keep on about dead relatives, tears and stuff. Just let it go. Have a good Thursday.
This post was edited on 9/28/23 at 6:37 am
Posted on 9/28/23 at 7:48 am to jangalang
I already explained why I talked about my pops.
You said a bunch of people here shed tears. Feels vs tears not the same thing. You found one who had a tears emoji.
Let's stick to the topic.
You said a bunch of people here shed tears. Feels vs tears not the same thing. You found one who had a tears emoji.
Let's stick to the topic.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 7:50 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
I already explained why I talked about my pops.
It required no explanation. You were heavily emotional. And thats fine if you are that kind of person....
Posted on 9/28/23 at 8:06 am to jangalang
Emotional does not always mean tears sir.
Even I, having lost my pops that year, and the man who showed me what Auburn meant to him, and took me to many games during some of our best teams, a man who gave back so much to the university even in his latter years, did not shed a tear that night.
Now that we spent time on that subject and you were only able to show one person shedding a tear, what does it matter if they do?
I would question a person that didn't feel anything from that game really loving Auburn. I would question calling a revered former player leading a beleaguered team during a shite show of a season, energizing the fan base and getting a victory "sensationalism" as really caring about the football program and Auburn.
I would question a person that celebrates being right over Auburn's woes, struggles, eager to show when they were right about Auburn would lose, really being a fan.
But that's just me, and maybe that person is so concerned about their persona on a message board, that they continue to play the role because they want to be remembered.
Even I, having lost my pops that year, and the man who showed me what Auburn meant to him, and took me to many games during some of our best teams, a man who gave back so much to the university even in his latter years, did not shed a tear that night.
Now that we spent time on that subject and you were only able to show one person shedding a tear, what does it matter if they do?
I would question a person that didn't feel anything from that game really loving Auburn. I would question calling a revered former player leading a beleaguered team during a shite show of a season, energizing the fan base and getting a victory "sensationalism" as really caring about the football program and Auburn.
I would question a person that celebrates being right over Auburn's woes, struggles, eager to show when they were right about Auburn would lose, really being a fan.
But that's just me, and maybe that person is so concerned about their persona on a message board, that they continue to play the role because they want to be remembered.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 8:18 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
I would question a person that celebrates being right over Auburn's woes
You were so hell bent on proving this board wasnt ridiculously emotional that you called me a liar when I had no inclination to argue this opinion. I am more interested in Caddy's job performance period
You are the only problem with this discussion. I said my peace then. I said then yall were going overboard and even a mod basically said "let em".
quote:
Now that we spent time on that subject and you were only able to show one person shedding a tear, what does it matter if they do?
For one there was nothing emotional about that game. It was pure built in sensationalism of one shite team beating another shite team. If youre that type of emotional man, then knock yourself out. But the emotional ones saying we should hire Caddy as HC I want to punch in the fricking face.
This post was edited on 9/28/23 at 8:20 am
Posted on 9/28/23 at 8:35 am to jangalang
quote:
You were so hell bent on proving this board wasnt ridiculously emotional
No, I was proving that you saying a BUNCH of people here shedding a TEAR was incorrect. Let's stick to the topic. Let's remember you called me a liar first, right?
I decided to play Jang and pick one word to focus on to show you how utterly stupid most of your arguments are.
This is what arguing with Jang is like for most of us, but you want to be remembered so why expect better?
Posted on 9/28/23 at 8:41 am to jangalang
quote:Meh... the game was certainly emotional. The people who wanted to make Caddy HC were thinking emotionally rather than logically... and got swept up in a Disney moment.
For one there was nothing emotional about that game. It was pure built in sensationalism of one shite team beating another shite team. If youre that type of emotional man, then knock yourself out. But the emotional ones saying we should hire Caddy as HC I want to punch in the fricking face.
If you think of it like a Disney movie story arc... people write scripts like this to elicit emotion
tyrant/villain thrown out > unlikely leader steps in to mend things > town/country/group rallys behind said leader > small victory is achieved showing there is light at the end of the tunnel... roll credits
Here:
(1) Bad AD hires bad HC... the guy is very unpopular, doesn't care about Auburn, and seems to do things to proactively hurt the University
(2) He's finally fired... program is somewhat in shambles given the amount of players leaving and his recruiting
(3) Team and fans rally around a popular leader (Caddy)
(4) Small victory is achieved - beat A&M, showing potential for future
(5) Roll credits
Posted on 9/28/23 at 8:47 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
No, I was proving that you saying a BUNCH of people here shedding a TEAR was incorrect. Let's stick to the topic. Let's remember you called me a liar first, right?
bullshite. You accused me of overly exaggerating for effect.
quote:
I decided to play Jang and pick one word to focus on to show you how utterly stupid most of your arguments are.
You picked one word that is pretty ironclad to dismantle most of my arguments. That is one of the stupidest things ive ever heard.
quote:
This is what arguing with Jang is like for most of us, but you want to be remembered so why expect better?
Why do I want to be remembered and why are you making shite up? If anything I want to remember yall. I want to remember when Rocky is soo emotional he brings up his dead pops just so later when he says people weren't hyper emotional then ill have the proof.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 8:48 am to ALhunter
quote:
Meh... the game was certainly emotional.
The game was two monkeys trying to frick a football. It was 12-7, meaningless football with meaningless implications.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 8:57 am to jangalang
quote:Meaningless for the CFB landscape that season. However, it demonstrated that everyone at Auburn could still come together in support of the team and set the stage for us moving forward.
meaningless football with meaningless implications
For a game to be emotional it doesn't need to have objective importance in the CFB landscape.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 8:58 am to jangalang
quote:
You accused me of overly exaggerating for effect.
You always do, and FYI, exaggerating is not considered lying. You exaggerate a lot.
quote:
That is one of the stupidest things ive ever heard.
Was the point because you tend to do that a lot as well.
You said it was very important to you to be remembered here. It's why you do what you do. This must be the only place that you feel you matter. It gives you the most meaning in your life. That's just really sad and pathetic.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:00 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
You always do, and FYI, exaggerating is not considered lying. You exaggerate a lot.
Well Im clearly not exaggerating. You were clearly hyper-emotional yourself. And dont ever accuse me of exaggerating unless I am. mmkay???
quote:
Was the point because you tend to do that a lot as well.
quote:
You said it was very important to you to be remembered here.
And you're making shite up again. Classic dumb Rocky
This post was edited on 9/28/23 at 9:12 am
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:02 am to jangalang
It's all true Jang. You are what you are. You're the Exaggerator in Chief of the Auburn board.
This post was edited on 9/28/23 at 9:04 am
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:03 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
You realize you might as well be arguing with a stump.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:07 am to AUX3
quote:It is frustrating to hear Freeze throw the players under the bus and absolve himself of responsibility by claiming we dont have the talent to win. He is an offensive guru that "brought the RPO game to the SEC", yet his offense looks worse than at any time during the Harsin era.
Seems Freeze needs to start owning the offense
Zero points scored in the first quarter this year? ZERO! That speaks to poor game planning. Even Gus could draw up a scoring drive. Freeze/Montgomery seem incapable at this point
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:13 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
You said it was very important to you to be remembered here.
quote:
It's all true Jang.
Prove it. Liar.
quote:
You're the Exaggerator in Chief of the Auburn board.
You brought up your dead relatives over a football game and youre throwing stones.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:18 am to higgs_boson
quote:
You realize you might as well be arguing with a stump.
Oh well. Hes making shite up.
I said then he was going overboard and he didnt argue whilememory was fresh. But he waits a year later while the memory is hazy to make his argument.
He is a classic, no-integrity POS.
He claims I am exaggerating about the emotions from that game when Rocky was one of the most emotional that night. Thats a fact.
This post was edited on 9/28/23 at 9:21 am
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:22 am to jangalang
quote:You are the most valuable of all the posters. The voice of reason and logic. Thank you for sticking around and putting these rubes in place
jangalang
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:27 am to ChexMix
It has to be done.
BtW a "bunch" doesn't equal more than 51% of the posters. Bunch is synonymous to many.
A majority can be deduced by the word "most."
I didn't exaggerate shite but I did whip Rockys dumb arse again.
BtW a "bunch" doesn't equal more than 51% of the posters. Bunch is synonymous to many.
A majority can be deduced by the word "most."
I didn't exaggerate shite but I did whip Rockys dumb arse again.
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top


0





