Started By
Message
re: Basketball Recruiting Thread 2025
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:41 am to jangalang
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:41 am to jangalang
quote:
Be better
Jang starts off by telling me not to be defensive, then proceeds to be a negative Nancy scoper poster for multiple pages while being massively defensive. Then resorts to name calling because he's basically being Scoper and doesn't have anything compelling and is just devolving into trying start fights and cause arguments in order to pretend like he never has a bad take.
1
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:43 am to jangalang
What is yall doin’?
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:43 am to auburnnyc94
quote:
will exit the "cult" if Pettiford stays in the draft. A lot of this rides on him.
Yeah, if Tahaad is gone we are in bad shape barring pulling a rabbit out of our hat in the portal for PG. We'd be lucky to scramble together a 10 seed at that point.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:44 am to BigBlueAU
quote:Well, you've never seen them play yet feel they are a NIT team based on nothing but your feelings.
So you've watched them "play a bit" now you think you're an expert on what THIS newly constructed team will be
Amazing glass house you live in there bud
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:47 am to auburnnyc94
quote:
I'm not even talking about talent, although I am very high on Magwood and the other Frosh. The proven talent is too good for us not to make some noise. The cohesiveness will determine how much I will exit the "cult" if Pettiford stays in the draft. A lot of this rides on him.
You defend this team an awful lot while afraid to make bold claims. Make a seed claim or shut it up. Making "some noise" is vague af. Missouri made some noise while losing 3-7 on the road. The only dipshits taking an L here are ones offended by an NIT comment. Grow a set.
I love Bruce more than you btw. Get a new avi.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:50 am to jangalang
Based solely on what we know and what we don’t know I have us at a 7 seed. Probably someone like 11-7 in conference. If we gel and the guys share the basketball I think 4/5 seed and 13-5ish in conference.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:51 am to auyushu
quote:
Jang starts off by telling me not to be defensive, then proceeds to be a negative Nancy scoper poster for multiple pages while being massively defensive. Then resorts to name calling because he's basically being Scoper and doesn't have anything compelling and is just devolving into trying start fights and cause arguments in order to pretend like he never has a bad take
what is all this babble?
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:53 am to jangalang
quote:After you said making seed claims are useless as no one knows what we have or how they play? Talking out of both sides of your mouth on that one
You defend this team an awful lot while afraid to make bold claims. Make a seed claim or shut it up.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:53 am to CorchJay
7 seed would be fine. Have to wonder if we will have the leadership in enough close games though.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:54 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
After you said making seed claims are useless as no one knows what we have or how they play?
He is the one defending the team he has never seen. If he believes we are that fricking proven then make the claim
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:56 am to jangalang
quote:And you and others are downplaying the team. Its a ridiculous argument.
He is the one defending the team he has never seen.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:57 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
And you and others are downplaying the team. Its a ridiculous argument.
I downplayed the team when Freeze brought in 40 new studs like you called them. Bringing in so many always yields a mixed bag.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:01 am to jangalang
quote:this is a basketball thread. Dont try and pivot
I downplayed the team when Freeze brought in 40 new studs like you called them.
No one knows how this team will pay together and to try and say the team will be a 7 seed is just dumb.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:10 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
this is a basketball thread. Dont try and pivot
How is it a pivot when it's same logic applies to both.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:11 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
No one knows how this team will pay together and to try and say the team will be a 7 seed is just dumb.
7 seed is too bearish?
Look at this cult you created, nyc94
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:13 am to jangalang
quote:It doesnt apply. Different sports altogether.
How is it a pivot when it's same logic applies to both.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:14 am to jangalang
quote:Only bama fans talk like this.
Look at this cult you created, nyc94
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:22 am to CorchJay
Basically, Jang can't handle some earned optimism in regards to our basketball program. I see a talented roster that Bruce will certainly earn at bare minimum a tourney bid with because he is a dang good coach. And me thinking that makes me culty.
There is proven talent roster that will yield at least some good results. I will withhold my seed prediction until we round out the roster because I see a glaring deficiency in us being one big man short.
There is proven talent roster that will yield at least some good results. I will withhold my seed prediction until we round out the roster because I see a glaring deficiency in us being one big man short.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:48 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
It doesnt apply. Different sports altogether.
bullshite. You bring in new guys. Some will pan out, some like your boy Howard will not.
That goes for all sports.
We are basically replacing our whole team. Lot of uncertainty and yall's pussy hurt over an NIT comment
This post was edited on 5/2/25 at 9:51 am
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:50 am to auburnnyc94
quote:
Basically, Jang can't handle some earned optimism in regards to our basketball program.
Keep culting bro. Optimism fills seats but doesnt secure wins.
Page 92 of 124
Latest Auburn News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News