Started By
Message

re: Too Early 2026 Predictions Topic

Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:27 pm to
Posted by Cover1Key
Member since Dec 2025
139 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:27 pm to
I actually think the personnel they have now fits what they do better.
- Bray Hubbard
- Jireh Edwards
- Zabian Brown
- Dijon Lee
- Justin Hill
- Yhonzae Pierre
- Xavier Griffin
- QB Reese/ Abdulla Sanders/Duke Johnson
DE: Thompkins (6’5 290lb USC transfer)/Edrik Hill
DT: Terrance Green (6’5 330)/ Jonathon Beamon (6’3 318)
NT: London Simmons/ Bingley Jones (6’4 340)

I think this is the best (and deepest) personnel the new staff has had after taking over after the departure of CNS’s 2023 defense that lost 9 starters (five 1st rounders plus Downs) along with 26 transfers.
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 7:45 pm
Posted by LucedaleTider
Lucedale
Member since Sep 2022
467 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:41 pm to
O Line is going to be bad next year

We lost our best dump off pass catcher TE Cuevas

Grubb will be running those slow developing routes

Not sure how anyone thinks this is a good situation for any new QB to have much success.

9-3 would be quite the job by the coaches
Posted by Sl0thstronautEsq
Member since Aug 2018
17743 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:47 am to
quote:

You seem hung-up on the number of “3-and-outs”. I am unclear as to why Total Defense (or even yards-allowed per play) do not interest you more because that gives you a clear picture of whether a defense is allowing teams to maintain drives or not.


What about looking at Stop Rate?

quote:

What is stop rate? It's a basic measurement of success: the percentage of a defense's drives that end in a punt, turnover or a turnover on downs. Defensive coordinators have the same goal regardless of their scheme, opponent or conference: prevent points and get off the field. Stop rate is a simple metric but can offer a good reflection of a defense's effectiveness on a per-drive basis in today's faster-tempo game.

Stop rate is not an advanced stat and is no substitute for Bill Connelly's SP+, FPI or other more comprehensive metrics. It's merely a different method for evaluating success on defense against FBS opponents.




Final college football defensive stop rate

Posted by Cover1Key
Member since Dec 2025
139 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:48 am to
I disagree with your assessment of the OLine. I think they will be improved as a unit.

I agree with you that Grubb and his 5-step drop/slow developing route concepts oriented offense will limit the ceiling for this team unless drastic changes are made

The defense (and improved kicking game) will keep them in most every game and give them a chance to win like this past season

Either Grubb/CKD make (drastic) changes to the offensive scheme (or Keelon Russell is Mahommes 2.0) will be the only way this team reaches their potential
Posted by Cover1Key
Member since Dec 2025
139 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:53 am to
It does not take field position into account. Nor does it take into account the accumulation of drives in a given game (it is easier to defend 8 drives bc you have an offense that consistently drives the ball/controls the clock and field position). It lacks context to say the least. Also, look at the mighty Georgia Bulldog defense only 5 spots higher.
Posted by Sl0thstronautEsq
Member since Aug 2018
17743 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:56 am to
quote:

It does not take field position into account. Nor does it take into account the accumulation of drives in a given game (it is easier to defend 8 drives bc you have an offense that consistently drives the ball/controls the clock and field position). It lacks context to say the least.


Alright man, whatever makes you feel better about our defense!
Posted by NWLA_Bama
Member since Aug 2024
1582 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 11:02 am to
I'm not concerned about the defense. The offense, specifically the offensive line is what concerns me. We've got to get fundamentally better and more phsyical on the OL or we'll register another four loss season.
Posted by Cover1Key
Member since Dec 2025
139 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 12:24 pm to
What do you think the regular season record would have been if the defense was ranked in the mid-20’s in Total Defense?

For context, they were #11 in Scoring and and #10 in Total Defense at the end of the regular season (10-2 record).

My estimate is 4-4 in the SEC (reality: 7-1)
Defense (imo) was the difference in:
1. Georgia: 24-21 (offense shutout in 2nd half)
2. Missouri: 20-17 (offense less than 100 total yards in 2nd half)
3. South Carolina: 28-22 (defense scored 9 points on their own and forced 3 takeaways)
4. LSU: 20-9 (offense had 7 three-and-outs). Defense forced 3 turnovers leading to two FG’s without the offense having to gain a first down)

Bonus: Holding Vandy and Pavia to just 14 points
Posted by Sl0thstronautEsq
Member since Aug 2018
17743 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Cover1Key


Listen, anyone can cherry-pick stats to make an argument. The bottom line is that I don't care for CKW's scheme, philosophy, or playcalling.

With the new clock rules, I think "bend but don't break" is a terrible philosophy because opponents chew up far too much clock.

I don't like how few blitzes CKW calls and I don't like the blitzes themselves (what's the success rate on blitzes by guys who are 10 yards away from the LOS at the snap?).

It's not worth the effort to write out a novel hitting on all the reasons why I don't like our defense, especially in a response to someone who won't be swayed.

So I'm glad you're happy with our defense. I'm not.
This post was edited on 1/22/26 at 12:36 pm
Posted by Cover1Key
Member since Dec 2025
139 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 2:55 pm to
I understand your sentiment, and I too wish the defense was the way it was in its hay-day with Pruitt from 2016-2017.
I do not love the defense and I wish teams feared them like the old days.

All I’m trying to point out is that in the 28 games that CKW has been the DC, only 13 teams have allowed less points. That includes allowing fewer yards and points than Kirby’s Georgia defense.


With an Offensive HC, the defense could be FAR worse. And it’s not like they have wasted a lot of talent. I would argue that the talent level defensively over the past two seasons has been the lowest since 2007.

What SEC game from this past year can you honestly say the defense didn’t play well enough to win? I don’t mean dominants, and I wish like hell they did completely dominate, but at the end of the day, they did enough to carry this team to Atlanta.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter