Started By
Message

re: I was wrong about Auburn - Golesh hired

Posted on 11/30/25 at 10:00 am to
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
16112 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Really?


Yes, really.

They played 4 ranked teams under Hugh and scored 17, 10, 10, and 17 (in 2OT) against them. They managed 26 against an Arkansas (one of their TDs was a pick-6) team that gave up an average of 38 on the season - and of course then scored 3 at home against a Kentucky team that averaged giving up 23.

Under Durkin they took Vandy and Alabama down to the wire - including putting >400 yards on a Bama defense that's been playing damned good.

Subjectively, they've also looked loads better. Offensively, they where a clusterfrick under Hugh.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
16112 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 10:02 am to
Golesh is a good hire if it turns out to be true.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
50981 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 10:02 am to
Sounds like it's done dellenger reporting
Posted by Bham Bammer
Member since Nov 2014
16288 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 10:02 am to
He had a worse win percentage than Hugh. Get no points for looking good
Posted by TizzyT4theUofA
This side of eternity
Member since Jun 2016
12205 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Golesh is a good hire if it turns out to be true.


Yeah, I would rather they hire Kelly.
Posted by InkStainedWretch
Member since Dec 2018
4718 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 10:16 am to
Great hire for them, (&@@ it.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter