Started By
Message

re: Henry Ruggs: car accident kills others, faces 2-20 years charged w/ DWI

Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:12 pm to
Posted by YStar
Member since Mar 2013
19172 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Rumors are also that while at Top Golf prior to the wreck, he was served a high number of drinks.


Then they share responsibility in the civil suit.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69484 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

But Ruggs and his passenger survived relatively unscathed.


They were drunk and their bodies were pretty much elastic due to how relaxed their muscles would have been.
Posted by Bham4Tide
In a Van down by the River
Member since Feb 2011
24023 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

Then they share responsibility in the civil suit.


Yep. If he was served too much alcohol, then Top Golf (or wherever he was) is most definitely liable as well. He was double the legal limit.

Whoever downvoted is wrong.

This is such a horrible, soul crushing story all the way around. Zero winners.
This post was edited on 11/3/21 at 2:40 pm
Posted by CrimsonBoz
Member since Sep 2014
19823 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:46 pm to
Tua’s Reaction

Tua got choked up speaking about it. This just sucks.
Posted by UASports23
Basketball School
Member since Nov 2009
25820 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 3:11 pm to
Yea, I don't think that Ruggs would hurt a soul, either.

Dude has always seemed to have a level head, respectful, and always been a good representative of the University.

I hate this for all involved. What a dumb and devastating decision.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
16113 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Why on earth would they have had to have a warrant if they had probably cause? I'd say that 156 MPH and odor of alcohol plus behavior obviously gave them that.


Because the 4th amendment protects you from unreasonable search and seizure. The courts have (quite rightly) held that stuff inside your body deserves the highest level of protection. That judicial review of the request for a search warrant is supposed to serve as the 'reasonableness' test.

Probable (not probably) cause is what the officer articulates to demonstrate that the search would be reasonable. As you said, the bar isn't hard to reach in this case.

You're likely confusing probable cause with exigent circumstances. Exigent circumstances let LE do things that would otherwise require a warrant - but they're limited to situations where there's a clear threat to someone, great risk of evidence destruction, or something similar that makes it obvious that time is critical. Ruggs wasn't going anywhere so those circumstances didn't exist here.

Sometimes when someone consents to a search, LE will still get a warrant so that later on there can't be an argument about whether or not the consent was freely given. You don't take chances when you don't have to do so lest you lose critical evidence and thus lose the case.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
16113 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

But Ruggs and his passenger survived relatively unscathed. They would ave been exposed to as much force from the front (against airbags and seatbelts) as this person was from the rear. Maybe the front facing safety equipment makes all the difference?

That AU sports caster and his wife died by a crash from the rear, though I don't recall the speed/details. Maybe we're less protected from the rear than we think.


I talked about this earlier. Look at the pictures - it was an underrun. The height of her SUV vs his Corvette matched up in a way where his car served as a ramp. The rear of her car isn't crushed in but the rear tires are pushed way forward. The Brambletts were hit by a vehicle of similar height as their car.

I really hope 1987 is right and the force of the impact caused a basilar skull fracture or similar immediately fatal injury but I'm afraid the autopsy is going to show the cause of death to be thermal burns and smoke inhalation.

Just terrible. Really, to me this should be a capital crime. That speed - particularly on that type of roadway, that BAC, it's just inexcusable. Since it can't be a capital crime at the very least he should never breathe free air again.
Posted by Skybox_rtr
Atlanta, GA
Member since May 2021
311 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Just terrible. Really, to me this should be a capital crime. That speed - particularly on that type of roadway, that BAC, it's just inexcusable. Since it can't be a capital crime at the very least he should never breathe free air again.
I completely disagree with you. Capital punishment, if it deserves a place in our legal system at all, should only be used for deliberate acts of violence like rape and first-degree murder. He made an inexplicably poor decision, but in no way did he plan to kill anyone. Your use of the word “inexcusable” is frightening. Abortion and drug dealing are inexcusable, but people don’t deserve to die for those.
This post was edited on 11/3/21 at 4:10 pm
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
16113 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

for deliberate acts of violence


Driving 160mph while drunk in a residential neighborhood is a textbook example of a deliberate act of violence and is inexcusable.

The fact that anyone would attempt to say otherwise disturbs me.
Posted by hnds2th
Member since May 2019
3096 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 4:13 pm to
This almost appears like a suicide attempt. Unfortunately, he killed someone else.
Posted by seanpendleton10
North Myrtle Beach SC
Member since Sep 2017
3375 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 4:14 pm to
Hes just describing the difference between someone who grabs a pistol and kills someone in cold blood as opposed to someone who is drunk and gets behind the wheel and kills someone. Legally it's not the same.... with that being said Henry sosekt deserve the lavish life he has anymore. He should do 20 plus years and lose all those millions made
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
16113 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Legally it's not the same


I know legally it isn't the same, which is why I said it was my opinion. I accept that society decided there is a distinction I just don't agree with it.
Posted by Skybox_rtr
Atlanta, GA
Member since May 2021
311 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

The fact that anyone would attempt to say otherwise disturbs me.
I meant “deliberate” to be for the variety of “long and careful consideration”, but I understand that’s a complex word that can have varying degrees of “diliberation” per se.

What saddens me is that it seems you have such a low value of life that you would so easily take another after the terrible loss of one for an inexplicably poor decision that deserves punishment. But killing “the bad people” isn’t the solution.
This post was edited on 11/3/21 at 4:25 pm
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
16113 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 4:32 pm to
I am for redemption opportunities in a great deal of situations. Automatically restored civil rights, alternative court systems, and other means of giving people a chance to turn their lives around.

Until you take another life through blatantly criminal actions.

He should get his life back when she gets hers back. If that makes me a bad person, so be it. Sorry, not sorry.
This post was edited on 11/3/21 at 4:33 pm
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
16113 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

I doubt very seriously she survived the impact.


Unfortunately, if the witness statements are accurate she not only survived she was conscious and screaming as bystanders tried to rescue her.
Posted by Skybox_rtr
Atlanta, GA
Member since May 2021
311 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

Unfortunately, if the witness statements are accurate she not only survived she was conscious and screaming as bystanders tried to rescue her.
No matter our difference of opinions on what the legal repercussions of the case should be, we can all agree that that is terribly sad news. Prayers for her family.
This post was edited on 11/3/21 at 5:01 pm
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
16113 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

No matter our difference of opinions on what the legal repercussions of the case should be, we can all agree that that is terribly sad news. Prayers for her family.


Absolutely.
Posted by CrimsonBoz
Member since Sep 2014
19823 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 5:38 pm to
That’s just awful.
Posted by Chad4Bama
Member since Sep 2020
8461 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 6:25 pm to
He deserves the death penalty. Such a willful and extreme disregard for human life. If that was my daughter, prison would be the safest place for him.

She died the most painful and horrible death...burned alive. It just makes me sick to my stomach.
Posted by YStar
Member since Mar 2013
19172 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

He deserves the death penalty.


You need help.

first pageprev pagePage 6 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter