Favorite team:Auburn 
Location:Alabama
Biography:All the non-sordid details
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1732
Registered on:1/17/2013
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

'It's not acceptable that she's still here, and that she can post all that stuff on the internet, and that's OK,' student Destiney Hall told the station.


Censorship

quote:

'I think everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but when it's so controversial like that, it can be uncomfortable for other people, especially if they're teachers,' another student, Lil Enloe, said.


Censorship

quote:

'I can no longer stay silent about the state of our schools. I will be attacked and threatened, but for the good of our district and the students with whom we are entrusted, I must speak out. This is too important,' the teacher began in her diatribe.


Bias in media reporting

quote:

Sullivan wrote that teachers are being told to push a 'strong anti-capitalism, anti-conservatism, and anti-American bias' on students.


The student quotes back up her statement.
quote:

Microsoft (MSFT) last ex-dividend date was on May 16, 2023. Microsoft distributed $0.68 per share that represents a 0.9% dividend yield.


quote:

According to Microsoft's latest financial reports and stock price the company's current number of shares outstanding is 7,441,000,000.


quote:

Microsoft had 221,000 employees on June 30, 2022


7,441,000,000 shares x $0.68/share = $5,059,880,000

$5,059,880,000 per last quarter / 221,000 employees = $22,895.38 per employee for a single quarter, potentially.

And they didn't get a raise when inflation skyrocketed.

Why do we have companies again?
quote:

Is “Long Covid” real


Covid is known to cause small ischemic strokes. People probably have long term emotional and memory issues associated with these events.
quote:

What good deeds would you perform if you were to win the lottery?


Buy apartment buildings and make them "rent to own". After a couple of years of payments, I'd transfer the title to the tenants.

Place grocery stores in neighborhoods that are under sourced.

Buy farmland and invite people to try their hand at farming. If after a couple of years they decide they like it, sell them the farm for a turnip.

Lots of things a person could do.
quote:

What’s something you think is trashy but seems to be common place in society today


Grown adults not minding their own business and making judgments about how someone else chooses to style, dress, or decorate themselves or their property.
quote:

If AI had been created in the 1950's and then starved of new art from that point on, it would now be at an improved state, but based solely on those styles. As Warhol, Frazetta, Basquiat, and Neiman became the popular artists of the day, those are the styles that AI would want to create to sell, but it wouldn't have the database to pull from. You might luck out and get a Patrick Nagel knock-off by AI accidentally combining his influences of pre-60's advertising illustration, pin-ups, and Japanese prints, but the chances of it hitting just as the complimentary 80's fashions made it so popular are extremely slim.



This is a simplistic strawman. First, literally a photo of every piece of art and photographed thing could be input from the beginning of mankind to the 50's. Secondly, every iteration and combination thereof could be run from 1950 to 2023, thousands per second for 73 years. And within the outputs it is very likely that you would recognize styles that have come and gone between the real world 1950 and this made-up Fallout-esque frozen in the 50s time period.
quote:

So basically what you're saying is that you do not believe that the creation of art is a worthy pursuit, and your bias in this regard is the principal reason for your opinion.


Define "worthy".

The worth of something is determined by the individual. So, do I believe that producing art has value? Yes, for the producer. Does it have value for the consumer? Only if/when the consumer finds value in it. In a survival scenario, there is no time for art, so it's value then is zero. Once needs are met, production of art may become valuable as free time is available, a luxury. You seem to be elevating the "artist" who sees their production as "a work", when it is actually just "work", non-utilitarian work.

The machinery has cut the "workload" into a microsecond, thus devaluing the cost of production. Further, it has devalued detail work as the detail time has been eliminated. I understand why commercial artists are freaking out. However, many of them gleefully told West Virginia coalminers to "learn to code" when their jobs became obsolete. It appears that the coalminers have indeed learned to code.

quote:

You don't seem to understand what "cultural development" even is.


Educate me.

From my understanding, culture develops from shared ideals. A person, or group, does something unique and then the surrounding people or groups copy it and add their own twists. Common motifs develop over time and a style or trend can be seen. This continues until a new element is added from within the group, or from contact with other cultures. Then the process starts anew.
quote:

It's theft. Pure and simple.


The origin work still exists in the space it was placed. The work wasn't duplicated and sold. It's not pure or simple as a one to one comparison.

quote:

It's not just another "next step" in technology. It relies on the appropriation of the work of others.


All artwork is derivative. What artists are arguing is for the end of cultural development. A stagnant stalemate where somehow their appropriated thing is valuable but past things are not and future things are impossible to create.

quote:

it causes your income to decrease and mine to increase


So is the industrial cycle, my friend. You've taken a personal luxury time waste and commoditized it, and now you're upset that engineers have industrialized it through the use of machinery? Your potter's wheel still has value, just fewer willing to pay your production cost.
quote:

So you're comparing taking other's people work, running it through an application, and generating a similar piece in a few moments to a person observing various art forms, spending years honing their craft, and generating something where you MIGHT see the influence of other artists?

Is this a "how dare you develop a skill I don't have, now I want stuff that makes you irrelevant" mentality?


No, this is a "your skills have been made an obsolete time sink due to an advance in technology" mentality. You see, when guns became more effective, archers who had honed their skills over years became obsolete, as the skill set needed for success changed. Archers still exist, but in a niche market now, just as the skilled hand artist will become. The new tech opens new opportunities. Instead of the greatest technical skill in a niche being the most valuable, now the person with the most creative ideals when it comes to prompts will have a higher market value. The "arts" aren't dead because of this technological change, they are transformed.

Think about it this way, the youtuber artist bitching about it uses photos taken by another person as a reference. Yet, he/she probably doesn't see her transmutation of the form he's/she's copying as theft, because they're making changes to it and recreating it in another medium. The youtuber cannot see the irony of their own position and you, a blind consumer, do not see it either.
quote:

she discovered that one of the AI developers used her art without permission or compensation to feed it into their software.


Viewing an art piece and then creating your own piece with stylistic elements of the original is not theft. It's how creativity naturally occurs. Of course, an artist with a vested interest in protecting their income source would argue against anything that devalues their revenue stream. That protectionist instinct does not make their argument valid. Especially when the human's style is based on their perception and study of everything that's come before them. Fair Use dictates that a substantive change to the original is a new product. Regardless of the originators butthurt.
quote:

The problem with AI is that it can’t create art.

It absorbed other people’s images and melds them together.


Literally all "art" is. A human brain remixing things that it's seen is similar to a computer remixing available inputs.
quote:

FWIW former Covid Bro Bass, I accept your apology. I hope we can move forward as a country. And the only way to do so is to forgive.


He should resign his position and be barred from practicing medicine and science.

quote:

I was wrong...And it cost lives.


Maleficence.

quote:

We created policy based on our preferences, then justified it using data.


Propaganda and oppression.

quote:

we portrayed those opposing our efforts as misguided, ignorant, selfish, and evil. We made science a team sport


Nazi-level sociopathy.

quote:

we gave him our support to do and say what he wanted


Unelected dictatorial powers.

quote:

We can avoid this rabid nationalism


Define nationalism.
quote:

I’ve never seen anything like it, in America no less, and the people blindly putting their trust in an all powerful government, in America no less


Dude, we had concentration camps in WWII...I'm sorry, "internment" camps.
quote:

This has been going on. Covid has been the biggest event in my career by far. Squeaky wheel does not get the grease with healthcare. It gets replaced. There are plenty of wheels. You go along or you go somewhere else.

As a provider in whatever capacity you just have to do what you truly feel is best for your patient. Do your best to leave politics out of it.

The worm turned on healthcare. And as in so many other instances, the people and not the policy are what gets punished. Shitting on PCPs and Nurses being the worst I have ever seen. The notion that we were complicit in anything is foolish.

I will just scale this back to myself. As an RN I do not have a research level research lab in my garage that I enjoy as a hobby. We rely on research and governing bodies. The CDC, WHO, NIH, and AMA and others all give us or gave us the data points we guide our practices on. The NIH being my personal favorite. Their web content and site are dry and to the point. “Just the facts”.

These entities failed us. The main failure was in their arrogance. “Follow the science” became a joke. My belief is they handled it poorly from the start. Instead of telling people the truth. “This is all we have. This is a new situation. This is a pandemic on a scale not seen since 1918. We have more tools to fight it but no reason to say we can keep it from acting like other pandemics.” I believe a fear of spooking the herd and speaking in false absolutes, spooked the herd even more.

The notion of doing “your own research” is unrealistic. Again I do not have a research lab in my garage. No one does. And wading into the weeds of fringe websites and researchers with axes to grind was always problematic before. Many were loons. Not so much anymore.

The CDC and WHO gave them all the credibility they never thought they would get.

This all became a clown world. Imagine pilots going somewhere than the FAA/NTSB or other industries going with other bodies than OSHA for their rules and safety plans. Are these entities without their problems? No. But would you want to fly under the rule of a brand new governing body for air travel? Or work in a refinery or platform with “Bobs Safety Company” in charge.



quote:

This new balloon streamed encrypted data back to their homeland while using extremely high resolution cameras - thermal, optical and other - as well as, other sensor data.


There is literally no evidence that any of this is true.
quote:

Disney's "Proud Family" reboot.


Watched a couple episodes of this recently while someone else had tuned in. It's black-face. Pride being a mortal sin kinda puts a conscious viewer on their toes, so kudos to them for naming it aptly. All the characters are self-centered aholes from San Fran. Would not let a child watch without helping them contextualize what they're seeing. The show attempts to normalize a lot of abnormal behavior like spying on people and just being mean and rude. All under the guise of "funny", "quirky", and "loving".
quote:

This was ChatGPT's response to the given hypothetical scenario:



In that scenario, the usage of the word is Love Speech, as you're trying to save several million people without harming anyone. WTF, Silicon Valley?
quote:

quote:
So, is Satan doing God's work?


Well, if God is omnipotent.....


Then rejecting Satan is anti-Christ. Ride the spiral and enjoy the ride while it lasts.

re: Why is alcohol legal?

Posted by blackinthesaddle on 2/6/23 at 12:51 pm
quote:

Responsible for more deaths than any other drug

Breaks up more families than any other drug

Have seen more people’s life spiral out of control more than any other drug

Only drug that can cause death stopping cold turkey for addicts.

Most of these stats are due to the fact that it’s legal and readily available. It’s also glorified in commercials of every show you watch. Why is that OT? Why is the drug allowed?


Because adults can decide for themselves what they choose to imbibe. Adults assess the risk vs. reward for themselves. Adults get to decide for themselves if they want to do things that are healthy or unhealthy. Adults are autonomous and do not need jackasses with "Baby" in their name parenting them.