Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:Played golf, then found math
Interests:Finding ways to buy expensive fishing gear without telling my wife.
Occupation:
Number of Posts:2188
Registered on:1/6/2013
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: How do YOU use this forum?

Posted by CFDoc on 5/2/25 at 9:58 pm
I’m just here for the waypoints and koozies. In that order.

re: He’s back!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CPG!!!

Posted by CFDoc on 4/18/25 at 8:54 pm
The video saying he had a job with USAID until DOGE killed it was hilarious.

re: PGA & LIV “closer” to deal

Posted by CFDoc on 4/8/25 at 8:55 am
And they had Holly Sonders interviewing players just before her career trajectory went into free fall and she ended up passing straight through "Trailer Trash" and landed firmly into the "B Grade Internet Porn Star" category.

It's all explained here: LINK

re: PGA & LIV “closer” to deal

Posted by CFDoc on 4/6/25 at 8:23 am
FWIW - had a conversation with a father of a PGAT golfer.

He pretty much confirmed that the dismal liv ratings has the PGA basically saying there’s 2 options for PIF:

- Give us a ton of money, kill LIV, and we’ll ’merge’.

- Go F yourself and we’ll just deal with the players once their contracts expire.
Math, the subject, is incomplete.

There are true mathematical statements that can never be proven.

Crazy.
What a dumb article.

Anybody with a JWICS account has access to ‘potential war scenarios’ with china.

re: PGA & LIV “closer” to deal

Posted by CFDoc on 3/18/25 at 9:07 am
Put me in the ‘this will never happen’ camp.

Seems to me like they’re gonna just continue to make a headline every couple of months or so with the ‘we’re getting closer’ narrative.

But I think the PGA Tour is fine without LIV players for now and they’ll just wait out their contracts and let them all come back to the PGA Tour after their contracts expire.
China owning Taiwan is bad for us. Really bad. For the very foreseeable future.
Looks like someone near you is interviewing for TS//SCI clearance.

Pretty standard stuff.

re: Remote career

Posted by CFDoc on 2/24/25 at 8:03 am
Software development.

Probably the largest field of WFH I know of.
DoD was also told not to respond.

Like I said in the other thread. These HR@opm emails are coming unencrypted, no markings or anything.

There’s absolutely no way I can send a meaningful response to an email with no encryption certificate about my time last week. All of which was spent in a SCIF.
DoD was just told not to respond to the HR email by Darin Selnick.

Makes sense though. I can’t send even an encrypted email back to that HR@opm address. Much less describe, in any detail, what I did last week considering I was in a SCIF the entire time.
Was DoD spared?

I don’t have the email yet, but got the Fork email.
Wonder what he expects from us that work in SCIFs every day.
quote:

We do our best every six years. He’s done a good job of avoiding a decent primary


Because from the government perspective, he’s doing a fantastic job funneling about 10% of the entire state’s GDP through the DoD.

That good ‘ol boy network doesn’t want to kill their cash cow leading the senate arms committee.

re: Anyone that played competitively…

Posted by CFDoc on 2/15/25 at 9:21 pm
quote:

I remember back in ‘86, I played in a Gulf States Section tournament @Belle Terre, first day shot 66, second day 84. For those that don’t believe golf is 50% “between the ears”


I turned in a 31 on the front nine in a junior event in Denton TX in 1999. I was informed I had a 5 shot lead.

I turned in a 49 on the back.

re: Turley sums up Musk/DOGE to a "t"

Posted by CFDoc on 2/5/25 at 4:53 pm
Only 20K have taken the buy-out offer. That’s way too low. Mostly because after everyone received the buy out email from HR@OPM, agency directors (usually SES level staff) would follow that up saying there was NO GUARANTEE that the buy out offer would be honored and there was no policy or procedure to allow it to be honored.

I know several folks that wanted to take the buyout but didn’t because of the follow up emails from SES’ers saying there was no guarantee.

Pretty soon they’ll be left with standard OPM policy methods to trim the workforce and those are, by design, very slow and difficult.



re: Drug Tests for Gov workers?

Posted by CFDoc on 2/1/25 at 6:27 pm
quote:

Depends what your clearance/sensitivity level is


Makes sense. Everything really cranked up when I entered the SCI/SAR world.

re: Drug Tests for Gov workers?

Posted by CFDoc on 2/1/25 at 6:22 pm
My federal position requires twice a year drug tests.

I guess I thought everybody else did too but guess not