Favorite team:Nebraska 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:24
Registered on:11/19/2010
Online Status: 

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

*Texas A&M also expects the Big 12 to negotiate the exist fee down from $30 Million quickly. (I'm sure the Big12 will get right on that..)


The big 12 exit fees are not set like that, and no way would it be $30 million considering they distribute around ~20 million to the big schools in the conference (under the new deal). They simply withhold a percentage of the money they distribute at the end of the season. They can't go asking for more.

They'd also be facing court battles and open records requests/depositions on all the other member institutions dealings with other conferences if they decided to not negotiate the fees down. I seriously doubt they want all that to come to light.

People that haven't been in the big 12 give them way too much benefit of the doubt as a conference as far as knowing what they are doing. They don't, there is no strong conference leadership there outside of the Texas AD's office, which is the defacto conference office. They like to bluster and make threats, but that's all they've got.
quote:

But I think there is what, a 4 year statute of limitations? If so, then all the illegal activity done in the mid 2000's may escape scrunity. In that senario, they appear to avoid a hell of a lot of damage, but still enough to probably level the most severe penalties we have seen since SMU, but will stop short of the death penalty. The fact that so much of the evidence can easily be substantiated is really scary for Miami.


There is, unless the same infractions go back further (as the story points out). Which in this case they do. So the NCAA can basically go back as far as they can find evidence.

Also:

LINK

Miami was already on probation during this time, for being a repeat violator. Basically any major infractions that happened between 2003 and 2008 would be repeat violator status and anything between 2003 and 2005 would have been while still on probation... should the NCAA decide to connect dots back that far.
It's financially beneficial to those teams, because most of them would never get invited to another AQ conference.

The big 12 was set up to starve the poor and fatten the rich, because, teams like ISU, or Kansas State didn't have the support of a Texas, OU, or Nebraska. Fine, they'd accepted their place as conference filler that once in awhile jumps up and bites people on the field in exchange for the added money that an AQ conference generates. Make no mistake about it though, it's a league that is only held together by lack of options and isn't financially viable if Texas isn't there.

They know that, so they are forced as a conference to do whatever Texas tells them Texas is going to do.

It's like someone beating a bunch of hookers but still paying them. They benefit financially, but that doesn't make the dude doing the beating not a complete jerk-off in anyone's world but yours.
You're right, Texas is great. Invite them to your conference and keep them far away from ours.

Please,

(signed everyone that's ever been in a conference with Texas)

re: Kansas State?

Posted by huskers9 on 8/14/11 at 2:46 pm
Someone got it!
I imagine it had to do with the BCS, TV, and Texas's population. Same things that drive expansion now, just not nearly as much money involved.

Nebraska also didn't control the old big 8 like Texas does the big 12 now. So it wasn't really in a position to control switching the big 8 to the big 12.

Yeah, it was a big mistake on everyone's part looking back. Especially the northern big 8 schools. It's not fun being in a conference where you either give Texas whatever they want or hope maybe the big east bails you out when Texas decides they can get a bigger better deal elsewhere if you don't.
They'll survive until they lose Missouri or start looking at a new TV contract in 5 years or whatever.

Missouri is the last team left with close (potential) BCS conference options.

ND isn't joining any conference, let alone a dying big 12. Texas likes to throw Arkansas out there as potential dream scenario expansion targets too, which is in the hell freezing over area also.
quote:


quote:

quote: nebraska colorado tcu, etc




Exactly. Not a peep out of 'em till now that their $$$ going straight down the drain.


This isn't exactly true, Texas didn't have the LHN last year though so the spin machine in Bristol wasn't in on that one, with the exception of the big 12 blog at times.

But there were plenty of big 12 columnists across the remaining states happy to work as Texas's mouth piece along with their press secretary Chip Brown doing his daily briefings on whatever agenda item Austin wanted out in the press that day.

So it's not like we walked away with no negative press. It's just that people realize that most of it traces back to being typical ut bullcrap and gets purged from a rational persons brain immediately after reading.

Much like this will, unfortunately, because its something that really should be addressed about espn's "reporting".
Everyone does see it.

What people dreaming of a schedule playing Iowa State, Kansas State, Baylor and Kansas in football don't seem to realize is this:

You are playing Iowa State, Kansas State, Baylor and Kansas in football, yearly. It's like turning Xbox settings down to easy and playing dynasty mode, IRL.

Yeah you have a pretty good shot at winning all those games, but nobody but you gives a crap, and you should be embarrassed about doing it.

re: No one talking about Texas

Posted by huskers9 on 8/14/11 at 7:16 am
quote:

Texas will ultimately tuck its tail and go to the big 10.



Probably not until a failed attempt at independence forces them to drop all ties with ESPN and beg for admittance into a conference without a list of demands.

Or so we can all hope. It's far more likely they work out a compromise with the PAC.

re: Texas Govonor says A&M/SEC talking

Posted by huskers9 on 8/10/11 at 8:53 pm
quote:

Obvious "10" story


Dear lord this is wishful thinking.

I'm wondering where the "possible 8" story went, yahoo's been silent and that was supposed to come out first. Yahoo is all bluster at this point.

re: Texas Govonor says A&M/SEC talking

Posted by huskers9 on 8/10/11 at 8:51 pm
pretty sure a conference already tried the 20 team thing and it didn't work so well... Which is why the accepted golden number seems to be 16.

It's hard to remember who with all the conference stuff going on.
Then just laugh to yourself and realize that if a game comes down to the wire you've probably got a better than 50/50 chance at it with your coach. Who else could say that in the SEC?
I don't know how anyone could say that luck isn't part of what Miles brings at this point. That's not an insult, he's just won more then his share of would be losses by the skin of his teeth luck at this point. It's exciting.

If some of his luck would have rubbed off on Bo, Nebraska wouldn't have lost 2 championships by 4 points or at :01 seconds. Hell if luck meant being the team winning games like: LINK I'd take luck every day. Why on earth would you take offense to that?

You are a complete moron.

Nebraska wasn't looking into it's own network so it could strong arm the conference members in moving conference games on it to make it succeed nor would they have had the backing of the monopoly network player in CFB to help it do so. Nor would it have likely been in the business of publicizing high-school recruits games.

Texas fans act like everyone out there operates like Texas, they don't. Not every school believes they can or should constantly sh*t where they sleep for short term maximizing of dollars at the expense of everyone that is forced to associate with them.

If the big 12 problems were solely a Nebraska problem, you wouldn't be seeing this come up again a week after Nebraska is gone and roar into another rumor firestorm within a month.

Retard.

quote:

Aggie is convinced they will take all the 4*s and 5*s from Texas and steamroll the SEC.


No they aren't, they are probably a little overly-optimistic about where they'd fit in a new league, but who wouldn't be.

If they are convinced of anything it seems to be that dealing with Texas + Espn doing whatever the hell they think is good for Texas/LHN at the expense of the entire conference is making an already bad situation worse, and it's time to get the hell out while they have options.

and lol at the blog, if anyone actually takes you seriously all they need to do to realize just how incredibly misinformed you are is load that link up and read a few paragraphs.

re: Yahoo! Sports tweet regarding PP7

Posted by huskers9 on 3/31/11 at 9:18 pm
quote:

Wrong, again.

Cam has a history of character issues and dad admitted his guilt. Also, multiple people corroborated the allegations.

Lyles has not said anything. The ONLY one claiming this is one assistant coach.


If he doesn't realize that his business is done he might be trying to hold on to that. It was done when the Oregon investigation started. The PP7 allegation just used a cannon to drive the nails into that coffin.

Maybe he's loyal and loves the kids hes trying to get 80k for. Then again it could just be a matter of time.

I think we all know which one we are hoping for, it is the off-season afterall.
quote:

FWIW, I believe Ziemba


Ziemba knows of no payments


I am serious


I do too, but there is no reason he would have any knowledge of anything going on. Wouldn't the first thing in a p4p scheme be basically limiting knowledge of it to those directly involved and trying to keep everyone else from seeing anything? If you have a recruit of two alumni and hes willing to commit for free why on earth does he think he'd see anything or get offered anything without asking for it? Former players not seeing it certainly doesn't disprove any allegations.

I think its become fairly obvious over the last 30 years that the whole recruiting system in college athletics for the money sports is crooked as hell. The amount of money skyrocketing over the last 30-40 years likely has only made it continue to be even more prevalent especially when we are talking about kids that academically would NEVER be accepted to most these universities. Many aren't looking for an education, they are forced into attending college because its the step between high-school to their dreams of being in the NFL or NBA. The money involved in the revenue sports has turned them into basically the NFL and NBA minor leagues. It's been embarrassing for individual schools blatantly disregarding rules before, but now its to the point where it is embarrassing for the NCAA as a whole. We're looking at probably losing the second national champion in 10 years (and we'd be looking at that even if Oregon would have won).

At some point its got to come to a head somewhere.

It'll probably end up with Auburn being a sacrificial lamb to so the people at the top to keep getting their cut of the money for as long as they can. Much like it will with the fiesta bowl getting thrown under the bus while the rest of the bowls try and deflect anyone's gaze from looking in their collective closets.

re: Just got back from the Nat'l Champ

Posted by huskers9 on 1/11/11 at 5:25 pm
quote:

Um, so why should the rule change?

If he's not down - he's not down.


Well he was down. Just was down on top of the defender. It was the right call, but a semi ridiculous rule that defies common sense as seen on the field. However it could have easily been avoided by playing to the whistle. I don't think the rule should be changed, but Oregon shouldn't have stopped playing until the whistle blew. It's on the defense more then it is any official's call.