
A75CADDY
Favorite team: | LSU ![]() |
Location: | BatonRouge, LA |
Biography: | |
Interests: | football |
Occupation: | lab tech |
Number of Posts: | 387 |
Registered on: | 11/17/2010 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: So what’s so damning about these Signal messages?
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/27/25 at 8:34 am
quote:
I had Red Dot Clearance in Afghanistan and yes 36ID did indeed use Signal during COVID and Riot.Control operations.
Listen to what you said, "During COVID and Riot Control". Communicating about COVID and riot control over signal and communicating attack plans 2 hours before an attack over signal are not the same.
re: So what’s so damning about these Signal messages?
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/27/25 at 8:19 am
quote:
Please tell me what specific targets were in that thread?
Please tell me what specific locations where to be targeted?
Please tell me how many F-18s or Reapers the United States own and did that release identify where they were located?
Please tell me how many minutes prior to the attack this information was passed to cabinet level secretaries on AN APPROVED ENCRYPTED APPLICATION.
Make no bones this is a self goal, but they admitted it was wrong and learned from it going forward.
This information was disseminated 2 hours before the attack. To be clear it is a violation of the law to transmit sensitive information on a non-secure platform (signal is not approved for transmitting classified information or sensitive information)If you cant understand why putting information about weapons systems in a chat two hours before an attack is dangerous then I can't help you. The target was discussed, because he was described to be at his girlfriends house. This has the potential to out an imbedded source on the ground. Lastly the Houthis have anti-aircraft guns. With 2 hours notice they could have been prepared to fire on the f18's and the drones we used during the attack (they've already shot down some of our drones.)
re: So what’s so damning about these Signal messages?
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/26/25 at 4:36 pm
quote:
The issue is adding the reporter. Not what was said.
That is not the only issue. The issue was the use of signal which is not approved for classified communication. The inclusion of the reporter also points to a failure to authenticate all the principles of the conversation and determine the need to know for everyone a party to the conversation.
re: So what’s so damning about these Signal messages?
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/26/25 at 4:32 pm
quote:
Damn I have gotten at least 100 fragos etc… over the encrypted radio. I guess I should get criminally charged if the cabinet secretaries are in trouble for have a collaborative planning group discussing sensitive information on an approved encrypted application!
Are you really comparing a FRAGO (defined as a brief, abbreviated order issued to change or modify a previously issued operation order (OPORD) over an ENCRYPTED radio to using a signal text message group with unverified participants to discuss time frames of attacks, weaponry, and targets? I can't believe you just typed that.
re: So what’s so damning about these Signal messages?
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/26/25 at 3:47 pm
quote:
So the president’s cabinet can’t talk to each other in real time about an operation directed by the POTUS?
It's not that hard to understand. If the need to know the information was that critical then they would have all been in the Situation Room and with the President and most likely with the Joint Chiefs and the National Security Adviser. They can talk, but by secure communication about an operation that is being planned and then executed.
re: So what’s so damning about these Signal messages?
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/26/25 at 3:27 pm
quote:
What’s your personal experience dealing with and talking to the Secretary of Defense and VP?
I have talked to neither, but I do have specific knowledge of the expectations for secure communication and know for sure that Signal threads on cell phones are not approved methods of communicating sensitive information. There was also no immediate need to share this information via signal.
re: Tactical Chat: How the U.S. Military Uses IRC to Wage War
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/26/25 at 3:09 pm
quote:
You are correct.
The admin should've just come out and owned it, then said they were getting rid of this Biden-era policy. Done and move on.
These aren't Biden Era policies. They have been the standard for protecting info for years now.
re: Tactical Chat: How the U.S. Military Uses IRC to Wage War
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/26/25 at 3:07 pm
quote:
I used mirc chat over a few countries in my past, hope nobody finds out!
Despite the U.S. military’s massive spending each year on advanced communications technology, the use of simple text chat or tactical chat has outpaced other systems to become one of the most popular paths for communicating practical information on the battlefield. Though the use of text chat by the U.S. military first began in the early 1990s, in recent years tactical chat has evolved into a “primary ‘comms’ path, having supplanted voice communications as the primary means of common operational picture (COP) updating in support of situational awareness.”
Only problem is that these folks weren't on the battlefield. They were in a position to communicate from a SCIF and chose to converse about highly sensitive information via a non-secure text group, one of whom was in Moscow at the time. There is a marked difference I'd think. A regular Joe would have been run out of the military on a rope if he'd been caught doing this.
re: Pete Hegseth responds
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/26/25 at 2:33 pm
quote:
It's CNN, so grain of salt and all that, but apparently they are dropping some of the Signal messages. Things like targets (people, who they are, not the name but 'top bomb maker' type of designations), type of aircraft, etc are in there. This information is absolutely useful to an enemy force. They are posting times as if they are operational times for key events. Maybe they are the time stamps of the messages though. It's CNN, so again, take it with a grain of salt. If they did this over Signal, this was really dumb.
CNN says The Atlantic is releasing this stuff. I don't subscribe to them so I can't post things direct from that site. You'd think they would bring this out from behind the paywall.
CNN has brought back Brian Stelter by the way.
They did all of this and that is what the uproar is about. There are time stamps and pete hudspeth is giving a play by play of what's about to happen hours before it happens. He describes the weapon system, targets and times of attack.
re: Could the CIA be responsible for this SIGNAL Gate debacle?
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/26/25 at 2:27 pm
quote:
When Waltz added Goldberg was Goldberg Listed as his initials "JG" or his full name?
How did Goldberg know that groups existence? It looks like an already named group. It is very strange.
As far as folks comparing it to everyday texting. Of course we all check who is in the group.
In this setting you trust your aides and staff and presume the people in the chat are all good to go at this level.
The sad thing is there is a very important DOGE hearing with NPR and AP on the hotseat that no one will watch. But the grilling from democrats committee is also on again today.
The urgent issues like China buying USA land carte blanche' is ignored over the dems questioning them like they committed treason.
Goldberg was added as a contact on signal first, which isn't strange as a number of officials noted that Goldberg was in their contacts. Days later he was added to the PC Houthi Group. What no one seems to understand is that signal nor cell phones are authorized for sharing what was at minimum secret information that was shared. The discussions had should have been conducted in a SCIF where cell phones are not allowed. One member of the signal text group was texting from Moscow. This was a monumental violation of law and protocol.
re: So what’s so damning about these Signal messages?
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/26/25 at 2:19 pm
quote:
If this is military then I know its legit. We used Signal for all of our COVID missions and Riot Control. Every unit was using it.
Signal and Session are the only ones that the government doesnt have a back door to.
You Sir, have been nowhere near the military. Classified communication is done over secure hard wired phone lines or secured networks. High levels discussions about military missions are discussed in a SCIF and no cell phones are allowed in a SCIF.
re: Mulkey is not a good Coach
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/8/25 at 10:46 pm
How can somebody be dumb enough to watch this game and not understand why she should play yhe bench?
re: Mulkey is not a good Coach
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/8/25 at 10:42 pm
Reading is fundamental
re: Mulkey is not a good Coach
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/8/25 at 10:39 pm
Back up the ignorance to your house. Oh, its already there.
re: Mulkey is not a good Coach
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/8/25 at 10:38 pm
Imagine being too dumb to understand this take.
re: Mulkey is not a good Coach
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/8/25 at 10:33 pm
Who's coaching then dumbass3?
re: Mulkey is not a good Coach
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/8/25 at 10:32 pm
Ur Slow
re: Mulkey is not a good Coach
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/8/25 at 8:38 pm
You can be a coach with a great winning percentage and stil devolve to being a bad coach. On is not exclusive of the other.
re: Mulkey is not a good Coach
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/8/25 at 8:37 pm
Ur only as good a coach as your last game
re: Mulkey is not a good Coach
Posted by A75CADDY on 3/8/25 at 8:36 pm
Or how can someone be dumb enough to watch this game and not understand why she doesn't play the reserves
Popular