| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | Baton Rouge |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 15190 |
| Registered on: | 1/21/2010 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
Is it possible that he could be impeached
Almost a certainty.
quote:
removed from office
Nope.
quote:
Does the new ballroom get stopped
Not the most pressing issue, but probably?
quote:
At the very least, it’ll be a stalemate, with vetoes and budget battles, right?
Yes. And also investigations. So many investigations.
Then in 2 years the battle, with bigger stakes, starts all over again.
0
quote:
Even if he eventually meets the public person criteria, he can still financially drain you with his pocket change by dragging the case out for years.
So lawfare?
re: Post your midterm predictions:
Posted by BigJim on 10/20/26 at 2:19 pm to GeneralLee
A lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth.
quote:
If only Obama and Biden hadn’t told Putin it was ok to invade Ukraine
And they did that how???
quote:
Old Sarge:
President Barack Obama chose not to launch a military intervention during Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea because of complex local politics in Ukraine, weak European backing, and fears of a broader escalation.
By not launching a military intervention?
re: Trump announces another $8 Billion in Socialism
Posted by BigJim on 10/20/26 at 11:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's not real socialism
It's not socialism...
It's bribery.
re: The deep state has been defeated
Posted by BigJim on 10/17/26 at 12:39 am to RelicBatches86
One issue with this conclusion is that the people in power get more donations.
R's hold all the power, so they get a lot more money.
If the D's get the House, they will see more donations. If they get both the House and Senate, donations will go up a lot.
At the end of the day, Rs will still probably raise more money as long Rs hold at least, one of the House, Senate or White House as business generally favors Rs.
Then it starts all over again for the next presidential race.
R's hold all the power, so they get a lot more money.
If the D's get the House, they will see more donations. If they get both the House and Senate, donations will go up a lot.
At the end of the day, Rs will still probably raise more money as long Rs hold at least, one of the House, Senate or White House as business generally favors Rs.
Then it starts all over again for the next presidential race.
Why give people a heads up that you are about to target them?
re: Man gets into tiger enclosure, probably an LSU fan
Posted by BigJim on 10/14/26 at 12:37 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
So, in most cases, you can probably expect to be around such captive big cats and not have any real problems...until you do. And then, it is usually a massive problem.
I think that's called "burying the lede!" :lol:
re: College Republicans of Boston U broke ranks and endorsed Action for Ohio
Posted by BigJim on 10/14/26 at 10:23 am to GreatLakesTiger24
WTH? Why would anybody care if what a student group in Boston thinks of a race in Ohio?
Just weird.
Just weird.
re: Can anything be gleaned about midterms from content on this board?
Posted by BigJim on 10/14/26 at 9:24 am to sidewalkside
quote:
Republicans will get wiped out in the midterms
Wiped out? No.
But they will most likely lose the House and it is more likely than not they lose the Senate (though I still have my doubts about that one).
Either way it will be relatively close in both chambers. Expect gridlock and a lot of investigations.
quote:
Universal healthcare relies on a classic demographic pyramid: a large base of working-age people paying income and corporate taxes to fund the medical needs of a smaller, older population.
Are you under the illusion that this isn't the case with American Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid?
They are worse off than us, but make no mistake, we are all on the same highway and heading to the same destination; the US is just getting there a little slower.
re: We (whites, actual Americans) are 100% getting replaced in our own country
Posted by BigJim on 10/11/26 at 4:59 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
we decided to go up to Broken Bow
quote:
We (whites, actual Americans) are 100% getting replaced in our own country
The irony reading is off the scale!
quote:
The embed feature has dragged this board into the gutter.
Yeah, that's what did it...
From one of the comments:
"It’s totally sarcasm, dude. But they’re good at it. They also have articles defending cannibalism and adultery on this site. They manage to write it all with a straight face and their veneer never cracks. I wish I were half this good."
I really don't know.
"It’s totally sarcasm, dude. But they’re good at it. They also have articles defending cannibalism and adultery on this site. They manage to write it all with a straight face and their veneer never cracks. I wish I were half this good."
I really don't know.
I just cannot envision a statewide republican losing in Texas.
But I don't follow Texas politics that closely.
But I don't follow Texas politics that closely.
re: It's OFFICIAL. Democrats have lost CNN. Trump named most influential POTUS in 150 years!!
Posted by BigJim on 10/5/26 at 11:59 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Probably 99% of the X posts that make it to PoliBoard fit this pattern: misleading red meat for the believers.
FIFY
re: 30 Year Yield 6.03%
Posted by BigJim on 10/5/26 at 11:24 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
The good news is it doesn't really matter. We'll all be hooked up to Matrix style machines in 5 years.
Waay better than the alternative possibility where Skynet is our overlord.
To be clear, I don’t care about this thread. I didn’t even read it. You might be absolutely correct.
I am commenting on the general idea that people seem to particularly call out SFP.
I am commenting on the general idea that people seem to particularly call out SFP.
quote:
Is your argument the more you talk about someone the more correct they are?
The more you talk about someone the more you seem infatuated you are with them.
And as a corollary, people not to argue with those they can easily dismiss. It's not worth the effort.
So you (and lots of those on this board) spend time and energy on him because he irks you. But part of that is that you cannot easily dismiss him.
Why? Is your argument that he gets called out on the PT (by name in the titles no less) because he is so wrong? There are a lot more people with a lot dumber arguments in this board.
So no, I don't know if he is correct or not. I do tend to find him at least thoughtful. I just know a large number of people spend time calling out a specific poster. To me, that's a not just notable, that's actually amusing.
However, there is an alternative theory, at least for a subsection of posters. It might be that people enjoy the clash of ideas. This very much might be your motivation. And he clearly does as well.
And honestly, the PT could use more of that.
quote:
SFPLC's minions *still* going wild in France.
It's amazing how he lives in some of your heads rent free.
Drawing flack because he's over the target???
Popular
19
