JoeENorthlando
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 38 |
| Registered on: | 4/9/2026 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Are we witnessing a real life, CFB Game of Thrones, play out?
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/27/26 at 10:53 am to Ebridg3
We are watching LSU aim the Titanic at the Iceberg.
0
re: CFP to discuss rule barring teams from competing with professional players
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/27/26 at 9:29 am to CWILKS3
Good. The rule changed. They got their four in. No need to screw the younger classes taking positions away from them. End this BS now.
re: Don’t Fold
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/27/26 at 8:43 am to Raging Tiger
All this but this eligibility expired while they were still under the older rules. No other courts in the country are finding the 2022 class needs an extra year. The Colorado Federal court rejected it. Come on...this is BS
re: SEC rule should be any player ruled ineligible by NCAA is ineligible
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/27/26 at 8:10 am to ItTakesAThief
Chambliss did not enter the 2026 NFL Draft.
re: Commissioner Sankey! Suspend Trinidad “Tonsillitis” Chambliss now!
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 3:27 pm to KevinD
What NFL team did he sign with?
re: This isn't a hill worth dying on....
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 3:04 pm to friendlyobservation
What NFL team did he sign with?
re: The SEC thinks they can deny the relief granted by a judge.
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 2:40 pm to XbengalTiger
So let them play. It only addresses them playing. The consequences if they do. Kiffin out 50% of games. 50% of football budget fine to the SEC. No voting on SEC business. And Greg Sankey sticking a boot up arse.
re: The SEC thinks they can deny the relief granted by a judge.
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 2:34 pm to XbengalTiger
Genius...it shows the reasoning used to undermine the possibility of allowing over 200 athletes to get another year.
re: SEC Ban on NFL or NBA players returning is official
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 2:33 pm to Ebridg3
I don't understand? Well, apparently, you do not understand. The La. judge issued a TRO that is defacto unenforceable. I guess when all these players are suited up and playing this season, I will come back and talk about how I was wrong. Until then...I can just laugh off the trolling commentary.
re: SEC Ban on NFL or NBA players returning is official
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 12:33 pm to klrstix
He will not win. And the reason was clarified by the federal judge last month...
On August 2, 2026, U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney in Denver clarified that the injunction did not override existing NCAA roster limits, transfer rules, or revenue-sharing caps, meaning players could only return if schools had available roster spots, eligibility and scholarship/revenue space.
The La. court cannot force a school to accept someone ineligible for multiple other reasons besides the exception created by the 5 for 5..
On August 2, 2026, U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney in Denver clarified that the injunction did not override existing NCAA roster limits, transfer rules, or revenue-sharing caps, meaning players could only return if schools had available roster spots, eligibility and scholarship/revenue space.
The La. court cannot force a school to accept someone ineligible for multiple other reasons besides the exception created by the 5 for 5..
re: The SEC thinks they can deny the relief granted by a judge.
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 12:31 pm to Honkus
Showing the reasoning behind the absurdity of the La. TRO. A federal judge pointing out why it will not fly.
re: The SEC thinks they can deny the relief granted by a judge.
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 11:16 am to Jabontik
On August 2, 2026, U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney in Denver clarified that the injunction did not override existing NCAA roster limits, transfer rules, or revenue-sharing caps, meaning players could only return if schools had available roster spots, eligibility and scholarship/revenue space.
re: The SEC thinks they can deny the relief granted by a judge.
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 11:14 am to XbengalTiger
On August 2, 2026, U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney in Denver clarified that the injunction did not override existing NCAA roster limits, transfer rules, or revenue-sharing caps, meaning players could only return if schools had available roster spots, eligibility and scholarship/revenue space.
re: The SEC thinks they can deny the relief granted by a judge.
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 11:07 am to GeauxLSUBengalTigers
What? Only another rule ignored by the judge? Would the judge allow someone academically ineligible to play as well? You can't pick and choose all these rules by blanket fiat that ignores eligibility requirements.
re: The SEC thinks they can deny the relief granted by a judge.
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 10:53 am to GeauxLSUBengalTigers
The SEC had a ruling BEFORE the TRO. Eligibility for transfers between SEC schools was dependent on the transfer occurring in the Spring semester only.
re: The SEC thinks they can deny the relief granted by a judge.
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 10:48 am to Jabontik
Judges trying to legislate well beyond the scope of the issues involved have been a problem. They are not gods that can reach in and ignore all the implications of their fiat-driven nonsense. The judge granted a narrowly tailored relief--a relief that is contrary to the rights of the SEC and NCAA to establish rules -- like grade requirements, transfer requirements, etc...
re: The SEC thinks they can deny the relief granted by a judge.
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 10:10 am to Ex-Popcorn
Thank you. I have been making this point over and over.
re: How much more disruption do you want days before the opener?
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 9:54 am to Pauvetibete
Timing...less than 2 weeks before the game. Call it weak arse minded, but you need to be locked in, not integrating new Fing players.
re: The SEC thinks they can deny the relief granted by a judge.
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 9:45 am to lsu777
Well, there was already a rule in place. For an SEC player to be eligible to transfer to another SEC school, it can only be done in the Spring portal. So their eligibility was already contrary to SEC rules. And they were ineligible. The next thing you are going to say is they don't need to enroll in class or reach the minimum GPA because they judge said so. It is nonsense.
re: How much more disruption do you want days before the opener?
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 9:00 am to Bert Macklin FBI
Absolutely is...players have gone since January with a set roster, then integrated the Freshmen. Now 12 days before the first game you throw in players that have already done four years. To pretend that has zero impact on the morale and thought processes of players--is a joke.
re: The SEC thinks they can deny the relief granted by a judge.
Posted by JoeENorthlando on 8/26/26 at 8:36 am to Honkus
The TRO is not effective on a player that is inelligible for a reason outside the scope of their court's purview - the 5 for 5 rule. If a player is academically ineligible- same thing. The scope of the court can't override every other eligibility issue.
Popular
36
