Favorite team:Oklahoma 
Location:Oklahoma
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:27
Registered on:7/21/2023
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Well bad news for the Sooners

Posted by OkieDokie on 8/7/24 at 1:55 pm
quote:


He was running 3rd or 4th WR right?

That’s the deepest part of OUs team. No big loss


He was set for a breakout this year. We know what we have in Burks and Anderson but Gibson offered unique length. He really started to come into his own last year. Agreed, his loss doesn't sink the WR room but He would have made it that much better.
If there's a position you can get by without a dude in the game today, it's running back. I don't really think this is going to change the outcome of the season drastically for you guys. As long as you have someone that can get some tough yardage and block effectively, you'll be fine.
quote:

Oklahoma is going to find out this isn


Gee, I haven't heard that one yet.
People keep harping on the O-line, which is understandable coming from someone who doesn't know much about Coach B. Our O-line will not be bad this year. I have supreme confidence in his ability to coach the guys up. I give it 50-50 odds that this years O-line is better than last years.

It will be light years better than what Arnold had in front of him in the bowl game.

I'm hearing the staff is feeling pretty confident about what they have on the O-line. It doesn't hurt when they can all go learn from a bunch of NFL dudes at Lane Johnsons place during the summer.
Lebby did some good things as OC, but he also had some tendencies that were problematic. His inability to adjust his pacing to the game situation stands out to me the most. His offense produced some really good statistics but would make the defenses job a lot harder when the offense couldn't find a rhythm.

From what I've heard, Littrell is going to be excellent as an OC. I don't expect the transition to be anything other than buttery smooth. Littrell has more experience than Lebby did when he was hired.

As far as Heupel is concerned, he's a very good OC. He had some struggles when he was coaching at OU, but he has developed a lot since then. I have a lot of respect for him and loved watching him as the QB in 1999 & 2000! Great dude and I expect him to be applauded when he returns to Norman this year!

re: Rankings vs Predicted Finish

Posted by OkieDokie on 7/23/24 at 4:51 pm
It would probably make more sense to not have preseason rankings at all, but then what would we talk about while we wait for actual football.

re: Rankings vs Predicted Finish

Posted by OkieDokie on 7/23/24 at 4:49 pm
It's not that it bothers me. Just trying to talk football. And seems like nobody knows what to make of this season with all of the change. It'll be fun to watch it shake out. :cheers:

re: Rankings vs Predicted Finish

Posted by OkieDokie on 7/23/24 at 3:42 pm
"Two Auburns"

Good catch, It was supposed to be Miss St at 14.

re: Rankings vs Predicted Finish

Posted by OkieDokie on 7/23/24 at 3:23 pm
Skins plenty thick. But that's no welcome where I come from.

Maybe my presentation just didn't come across as interesting. I can own that if it's true.

Maybe what would be interesting, would be to do a side by side comparison of Ranking of who you would consider the best teams vs the order you think each Team will finish in the SEC this year.

I'll go first.
Preseason Ranking
1 Georgia
2 Texas
3 Alabama
4 Ole Miss
5 Oklahoma
6 Tennessee
7 LSU
8 Missouri
9 Texas A&M
10 Kentucky
11 South Carolina
12 Florida
13 Auburn
14 Mississipi State
15 Arkansas
16 Vanderbilt

Predicted Finish
1 Georgia
2 Texas
2 Ole Miss
2 Missouri
5 Alabama
5 Oklahoma
5 Tennessee
5 LSU
5 Texas A&M
10 Kentucky
10 South Carolina
12 Auburn
13 Florida
14 Auburn
15 Arkansas
16 Vanderbilt


re: Rankings vs Predicted Finish

Posted by OkieDokie on 7/23/24 at 2:56 pm
Wow, 3 downvotes! You guys are jerks. Just trying to engage other fanbases.

Rankings vs Predicted Finish

Posted by OkieDokie on 7/23/24 at 11:50 am
I'm sure this is not the first time this has been brought up, but it feels more relevant today than in past years to me.

Why do people bring up schedule when talking about pre-season rankings? I'm scratching my head as to what that has to do with ranking the best teams. As the season progresses it makes sense to consider a team's resume but that is a different exercise all together.

I would say who cares but where teams begin the season actually matters. What does SECRANT have to say about this?

re: Check in here

Posted by OkieDokie on 6/25/24 at 2:19 pm
Mostly lurking around TFB but I'll try and post occasionally around here.

:cheers:

re: CBS' post-spring power rankings

Posted by OkieDokie on 5/9/24 at 9:55 am
Yeah, we'll see how Arnold does. I have high hopes but am cautious until I see it on the field. I am really hoping that Littrell will be better at TOP and will have a better feel for the flow of the game. I always felt like Lebby was in his own world just trying to go fast. He improved a little last year, but it still felt like he was trying too hard to scheme and rush the offense. Often it seemed that execution suffered as a result.

re: CBS' post-spring power rankings

Posted by OkieDokie on 5/9/24 at 9:46 am
This is a lazy take. The transfers are only new starters at Oklahoma and Jacob Sexton started the last 5 or 6 games last year at one of the tackle spots and did well. The sooners also grabbed a veteran C out of the portal in Branson Hickman from SMU. Jake Taylor sat out last year recovering from injury but he played some good ball in 2022. Not to mention that Bill B is probably a top 3 OL coach in the NCAA. His track record of development is unquestionable.

OU also pulled in an awesome OL class in recruiting, but I don't expect any of them to be needed this year barring multiple injuries.

I agree that the OL is an area to watch but it's not as dire as the article paints it.




re: I’m gonna miss the old SEC

Posted by OkieDokie on 2/15/24 at 10:31 am
I agree that OU & Texas don't really belong in the SEC. As far as history and tradition they belong but that's not the only thing to consider.

The reality is, it's not exactly the real SEC anymore just like the Big 12 wasn't the Big 12 anymore and the Big 10 isn't the Big 10 anymore. It's not just the SEC that is moving away from what made college football better than the NFL to many. It's happening across the country.

I still love CFB but it's not the same sport and has lost much of its charm with realignment and pay for play.

Best Draft Class for your school

Posted by OkieDokie on 2/15/24 at 9:36 am
Inspired by Koreandawgs most #1 draft picks thread. What is the best draft class your school has produced?

If its based only on the draft results I think it has to be 2010 for the Sooners. That may be the best based on careers as well considering it has 3 multi-year probowlers.

Round 1 Pick 1 - Sam Bradford (QB)
Round 1 Pick 3 - Geral McCoy (DT)
Round 1 Pick 4 - Trent Williams (T)
Round 1 Pick 21 - Jermaine Gresham (TE)
Round 4 Pick 23 - Keenan Clayton (LB)
Round 5 Pick 4 - Dominique Franks (DB)
Round 5 Pick 31 - Brody Eldridge (TE)

re: College Football Crowd Size

Posted by OkieDokie on 1/8/24 at 11:35 am
quote:

My take on this isn't intimidation of opposing teams by crowd size, it's fan support.

No conference has such driven fan support as the SEC. It's pressure from the fans that drive the programs to be as great as they are.



That's a good point. I'd be curious about the ratio of graduating class size to average gameday attendance.

re: College Football Crowd Size

Posted by OkieDokie on 1/8/24 at 11:13 am
I think most sooner fans would tell you that we would much rather our team play in these environments than the sleepy current big 12 environments. It's not like we've run from big environments, we were playing the Ohio States, ND's & Tennessee's of the world in the non-con in the BCS and early CFP eras. We were scheduled to have Georgia and LSU on the schedule prior to the SEC announcement.

One thing I've seen in the recent big 12 is how an 11 AM kick with a small crowd size like Kansas can negatively affect a team. The effect might be more significant than the big environments which can be an additional motivation for a team.
If you are including Oklahoma backs then you have to include Billy Sims (Heisman), Demarco Murray, Steve Owens (Heisman), Billy Vessels (Heisman) and Joe Washington.
:nana:
Nice get! Even after losing a guy like Green, I feel good about BB's ability to recruit and develop OL's. That's a position group that has consistently produced for us. I'm not sure anybody has put more guys into the league than BB.