bstaceyau19

quote:

---

I don’t keep track of MBG or any other board rating system but for Tigerdroppings to be ninth in any rating system is ridiculous. Chicken provides the main message board community for the entire SEC and beyond.

---

My guess is they just count the number of times they tweet out a posting on a message board and then count them all up at the end of the year. Remember, MBG tweets out posts that are extra special stupid. Normal stupidity doesn't qualify; only the cream of the asinine crop ends up on MBG.

So, given that TD is #1, interpret that as you see fit.

Do we really know what Moore's drafting philosophy is? He drafted a tackle last year, but that tackle happened to be the best available guy at a position of need. I wouldn't read too much into that.

quote:

---

What a weird statement by PGAT

---

It's actually not if you remember what PGAT golfers have said in the past about LIV golfers.

Basically, if they want back in, they have to go back to Q School, then Korn Ferry, and play their way back onto the PGAT. Plus give up all the money they got in LIV. That's what players have said.

Now I doubt the reality will be that harsh, especially if more guys try to come back, but it's not just going to be "Welcome Back, here's your card."

quote:

---

because its not necessary right now, and there is zero upside to the team vs the current interim tag. how do you know there wont be a better option? the curse of this team has been eliminating options for no reason

---

This.

I have an authentic Jimmy Graham jersey. I still wear it. It cost too much to just retire.

Cam Jordan had all the family there today.

Tayson given an opportunity for a garbage time TD and nearly breaks down during his post game presser.

Then this:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

This behavior indicates they know their time here is done. Full speed ahead on the rebuild.

That's 29 points in 23 minutes off the bench, plus 7 boards. I'd call that a game.

We don't have a WR1. We have a WR2 and a bunch of serviceable 3's and 4's. If a bona fide WR1 is on the board when we are drafting, we need to pounce.

quote:

---

Okay I see your point. But you are subtracting a very expensive player that must be replaced, without freeing up cap space to pay him.

So there's a downside to cutting even an underperforming player.

---

This is also correct. Players provide value by actually being on the roster and being able to play. Teams consider this when deciding who to cut and who not to cut but the internet cap gurus never consider this point. All they can measure is dollars and cents.

Roster building in the NFL is all about present and future value, both objective and subjective. It's not just simple mathematics.

I think this is where teams talk themselves into more trouble and where Loomis' way is actually good.

If they are done with Tua, then need to take the cheapest possible road out no matter how much of his contract becomes dead money. One thing about Loomis, he is willing to take big hits on dead money if it's the cheapest way out of a bad contract. Some GM's keep lame duck guys on the roster just to avoid money becoming dead and end up paying more in the long run.

I hate to break this to everyone, but most of these guys' contract situations will make trading them very hard this season. No one is on an expiring deal.

This time next season is the time to sell. This year we are stuck with the guys we have.

Just don't get upset when they don't hardly trade anyone this year; this is the reason.