LSU=Champions

Yes, but it’d still require a hearing to evaluate the nature of the offense and any mitigating factors to consider. Basically another layer for the judge to lessen the forfeiture penalty amount.

Assuming city successfully gets past that stage, then the city would have to initiate garnishment/seizure proceedings, which knowing Destroya she’d have herself robed in multiple layers of fraud insulating her from liquidity.

A lot of misinformation/confusion about Chambliss eligibility timeline. Will try to clarify.

In October 2025, Ole Miss submitted waiver request to NCAA for Chambliss to obtain medical redshirt approval for 2022 season while at Ferris State. This waiver request was apparently supplemented by OM in November 2025.

In early December 2025, NCAA denied OM’s initial waiver request. OM then appealed to appropriate NCAA Committee level.

On January 9, 2026, the day after OM lost to Miami in CFP, NCAA issued press release of its Committee level denial of Chambliss’ waiver request. OM then appealed to final NCAA body with administrative authority.

Yesterday, January 21, 2026, NCAA held a hearing on final administrative appeal.

At this time, all parties are awaiting NCAA ruling at this final admin appeal level, but consensus expectation is another denial of the waiver request. This would be the last stage in the proceedings at the administrative level.

If final admin appeal is favorable to Chambliss, he’d be immediately eligible and there’d be nothing further to do. However, if ruling is as expected, the next stage of civil litigation will continue on - which is why Chambliss has already since filed Petition for Preliminary Injunction and Permanent Injunction at Mississippi state court level as of January 16, 2026.

No hearing is set in that case as of yet. Expectation is Chambliss is simply awaiting the NCAA final ruling on the appeal to ask the MS state judge for a hearing on the preliminary injunction first, after which there would be a full trial on the merits of the permanent injunction request. Both dates are undetermined but the preliminary injunction hearing would be set on an expedited basis (within 15-30 days of the request) and the permanent injunction would be several months down the road from there. Expectation is Chambliss will likely be successful in obtaining a preliminary injunction from MS state court (see Pavia and Alabama basketball player’s cases). The NCAA’s best chance of defeating Chambliss is on an appeal and to a lesser degree the full trial on the merits of the permanent injunction (or if it can figure out a non-diversity basis to remove the case to federal court). With all of that said, Chambliss is mainly focused on obtaining the preliminary injunction relief and then delaying ruling on the permanent injunction relief until a time after the 2026 season concludes, which by that time would be moot.

It’s truly amazing the degree of absolute bullshite people just make up out of thin air and post as fact.

quote:

---

won’t they just remove this to federal court? are they arguing amount in dispute?

---

@TomMarsLaw: I’ve been asked many times why the NCAA doesn’t transfer state court lawsuits to federal court using “diversity of citizenship” as a basis for jurisdiction. It can’t. As an unincorporated association, the NCAA is considered to be a citizen of every state in which it has members. If the NCAA had been smart, they would’ve incorporated the national entity years ago and made it a member of the association. That way, they could remove all state court cases outside of Indiana to federal court. But seeing around corners doesn’t seem to be their strong suit.

quote:

---

So, we’ve entered the phase where yall just say whatever you want regardless of whether it’s true.

It was widely reported that Chambliss attached 91 pages of medical records to his application submitted to the NCAA.

---

Ah, another mouthpiece passing along buzz phrases conveniently worded for PR purposes solely to paint a picture of a story that is entirely hollow at its core.

Can 2 facts both be true at the same time? Yes, they can be.

FACT: Chambliss submitted 91 pages of medical records to the NCAA with his application.

FACT: Of those 91 pages of medical records submitted, not 1 page substantiates Chambliss’ argument that he had a diagnosed medical condition during the time period at issue.

If there was a medical record that substantiated what Chambliss needed to prove his claim - something that is routinely coded everyday by medical professionals for such claimed conditions, not some clerical oversight, and something incredibly easy to find on review of a medical records production if it existed - it would have been identified, processed, and cleared by now. And Chambliss’ attys wouldn’t have submitted some 91 pages of fluff. Only 1 page of his medical file would necessary. The treating or supervising doctor could easily dictate a 3 sentence letter regurgitating the symptoms presented, objective findings, diagnosed condition, and restrictions/limitations resulting therefrom. It’s because that page doesn’t exist in his file. It’s because medical treatment doesn’t exist for the relevant time period. It’s because a medical basis for the claimed medical condition doesn’t exist. It’s why Chambliss’ camp is reaching for straws with letters from non-medical professionals some several hundreds of days after the subject events.

The story is a fabrication, at least the medical condition being the basis for the medical redshirt being the fabrication. It was worth the ole college try to see if the NCAA would bite the hook, but it didn’t. Just because the NCAA has been wrong countless times on prior eligibility decisions is irrelevant to Chambliss who has no medical proof.

Are both facts true at the same time? Yes, they are.

quote:

---

Primeaux gave up a bunch of walks to fill the bases and walk in a run then there was a DP that scored another run.

---

There’s something to be said for consistency.

You’re fine at that height. I’d be comfortable recommending anything at or above 10. A couple rows below 10 could be fine, but that’d be getting in gray area. Visitor some friends in row 5 last week and it’s no bueno. Also alot of randos/opposing team fans/non-season ticket holders in those obstructed view rows. The 20s are the sweet spot - I’m in 27 :pimp:

$80. Pick up in Baton Rouge only.

If interested, comment with your information and I will contact directly.

I wonder how this compares to CFB and P4 teams across the board.

1) I’d expect modern era of the sport to be much higher % of pass plays called than 5, 10, 15, etc years ago.

2) I’d also expect having an experienced, pro prospect at QB helm, which we undoubtably had last year and continue to have this year despite current offensive struggles, inherently bumps out pass play % higher than the norm.

There are those self-powered BCBS bikes that are stored on blue racks randomly throughout campus.