Metaloctopus
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | Louisiana |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | All things LSU, drums, guitar, shooting pool and other random things that aren't worth listing. |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 6687 |
| Registered on: | 11/1/2018 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Anyone who requires government support should not be allowed to vote
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/18/25 at 5:28 pm to wallowinit
If I am supposedly for the status quo, then why do I agree with work requirements and not subsidizing junk food, which currently is far from the status quo?
I think your demands are ridiculous. It has nothing to do with a personal fear. I don't live on welfare. But I also know people who work very hard, and are on food stamps to help them, and these people are not "losers". Some of you are full of yourselves.
I think your demands are ridiculous. It has nothing to do with a personal fear. I don't live on welfare. But I also know people who work very hard, and are on food stamps to help them, and these people are not "losers". Some of you are full of yourselves.
re: 48 Mosques have invaded Dallas/Fort Worth in the last two years
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/17/25 at 5:44 am to ZIGG
Yeah, but they're "not our problem", so I keep hearing from fake conservatives who want America to stay out of what's going on abroad with Muslims. They don't think it will come here, even though it already has.
re: Anyone who requires government support should not be allowed to vote
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/17/25 at 3:39 am to wallowinit
quote:
So make it where you have to be a net taxpayer in order to vote. Perhaps make it a requirement to have multiple years of being a net taxpayer.
I still think that's over the top. In my opinion, a working, legal citizen is a contributing member of society. Telling them they don't have a right to a say of what goes on in this country based on their tax return is not how anything should work.
I understand the arguments against non working people. But when it comes to people who are actually trying, but they are struggling with horrendous inflation and need something like foodstamps, the government shouldn't be allowed to punish those people for the problems that they (the government) created.
People keep complaining and moving the goal posts on this subject. First, it's "make them get a job". I agree. Then, it's "don't let them buy junk food". I agree. But now, penalizing working people based on their tax return? When is it going to be enough?
I have a much better idea for all citizens: Get rid of the income tax, which never should have existed in the first place, and stop giving aide to those who aren't even legal citizens. That might be a pipe dream, but in the meantime, let's not treat working people like they're garbage. It's extremely arrogant.
re: Anyone who requires government support should not be allowed to vote
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/16/25 at 11:17 pm to TigerVespamon
quote:
Nor do I. Perhaps that’s because I don’t have any family or friends who are trash.
Can you explain what this means? What would make a person trash if they get a larger refund, because the system is set up that way?
You don't get any refund if you don't work. And while I don't know of any examples of someone getting more than they paid in, I don't see how it's their fault that the government gives them more. Blame socialists in our government. You and I both know you wouldn't turn down such a refund if it were offered to you.
re: Anyone who requires government support should not be allowed to vote
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/16/25 at 6:46 am to The Cow Goes Moo Moo
quote:
What if those folks who “pay” income tax receive tax refunds in an amount that is larger than the amount of income tax they pay?
I don't know anyone who gets a larger refund than the amount they paid, without having child tax credits added in.
re: Muslims, not Israel, are the biggest most legitimate threat to the western world and U.S.
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/16/25 at 6:38 am to CAD703X
quote:
why do we have to care about either?
This is incredibly lazy.
Why? Because Muslims have been slowly taking over in countries all over the world, and they already have a strong foothold here. And why is that important? Because Islam is the most dangerous "religion" in the world, that leaves destruction in its path, everywhere it goes.
I have been beating this drum for two years, as I've listened to people say "not our war". It IS our war. It's going on here, and it's going on abroad and spreading, which will impact us directly if it isn't stopped.
re: Anyone who requires government support should not be allowed to vote
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/16/25 at 6:26 am to burger bearcat
I disagree. I think anyone who works and is a legal citizen, should always have the right to vote. Workers get taxed for the money that the government uses to pay for these programs. So if someone is working, and also is on food stamps to help them out, they should be allowed to benefit from the money that is being taken from them in the first place. And yes, they absolutely have a right to have a say in this country, and be allowed to vote.
If you want to argue, still, that they shouldn't be allowed to vote, then I'll argue with you and say that if the government should not allow them to vote, then they should stop taking money out of their checks for welfare programs.
If you want to argue, still, that they shouldn't be allowed to vote, then I'll argue with you and say that if the government should not allow them to vote, then they should stop taking money out of their checks for welfare programs.
re: Protestants in Europe have fallen
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/12/25 at 12:05 am to Narax
Please don't refer to these as protestants. They aren't even remotely Christian.
re: Was Candace Owens Harassing Charlie Kirk and Erika?
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/12/25 at 12:03 am to SouthernHog
Your ignorance is your own problem, friend.
re: Was Candace Owens Harassing Charlie Kirk and Erika?
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/11/25 at 3:05 am to rmnldr
America first is not about blaming everything on the Jews, without evidence. Being a Christian is also not a political movement. A believer in Christ does not stand by people who claim to be conservatives, who are filled with hatred and inciting others to hate.
America first is not about blaming Israel for protecting itself from Muslim terrorists. America first is not about saying that Hitler was "a pretty cool guy", or that Sharia Law isn't so bad. It's not about blaming TPUSA for Charlie's death. These are some of the crazy things coming from Tucker, Owens and Fuentes.
It's not about whether you are a Zionist, or whatever you want to call yourself. It's calling out evil where it exists. These people are lying about everything Israel does, making conspiracy theories about everything, and putting people in harms way by throwing accusations around.
Meanwhile, people like Dinesh are some of the very few talking about the mass murdering of Christians in Nigeria and Sudan by Muslims, while these hacks just keep talking about the Jews.
Some people care about MORE than America. Some of us actually care about right and wrong, and not just pretending that America is the only place that matters. We all want closed borders, lower taxes, and fair trades. We all care about the things that matter to this country. But we can care about more than just out own backyard at one time.
I've never seen the passage in the Bible that said to only care about your country. MAGA, if it is indeed "dead", is not so because of people who care about more than just ourselves. It's because of people who never understood what it meant to begin with. America "first" is not America only. America and Israel have had a strong relationship for a reason. protecting the only place in a sea of Islamic rule that shares much of our western culture is key in balancing the powers in that area. If we lose that, those countries are all coming after us.
But no one cares about that. All they have time for is listening to some hacks rewriting history for their own agenda.
Let me ask you something. Is it "America first" for these people to spend all their time talking about Israel? If no one can defend Israel from baseless attacks, without people complaining that they don't care about America, then why is it ok for people to keep attacking Israel? Why doesn't anyone ask Candace or Tucker or any of these people to talk about America? Why the double standard? The only reason anyone has to defend Israel, is because so many others won't stop talking about them and blaming every little thing on them. Something bad happens, it's the Jews' fault. It can never be the people who actually did the bad thing, it's always that the Jews made them do it.
America first is not about blaming Israel for protecting itself from Muslim terrorists. America first is not about saying that Hitler was "a pretty cool guy", or that Sharia Law isn't so bad. It's not about blaming TPUSA for Charlie's death. These are some of the crazy things coming from Tucker, Owens and Fuentes.
It's not about whether you are a Zionist, or whatever you want to call yourself. It's calling out evil where it exists. These people are lying about everything Israel does, making conspiracy theories about everything, and putting people in harms way by throwing accusations around.
Meanwhile, people like Dinesh are some of the very few talking about the mass murdering of Christians in Nigeria and Sudan by Muslims, while these hacks just keep talking about the Jews.
Some people care about MORE than America. Some of us actually care about right and wrong, and not just pretending that America is the only place that matters. We all want closed borders, lower taxes, and fair trades. We all care about the things that matter to this country. But we can care about more than just out own backyard at one time.
I've never seen the passage in the Bible that said to only care about your country. MAGA, if it is indeed "dead", is not so because of people who care about more than just ourselves. It's because of people who never understood what it meant to begin with. America "first" is not America only. America and Israel have had a strong relationship for a reason. protecting the only place in a sea of Islamic rule that shares much of our western culture is key in balancing the powers in that area. If we lose that, those countries are all coming after us.
But no one cares about that. All they have time for is listening to some hacks rewriting history for their own agenda.
Let me ask you something. Is it "America first" for these people to spend all their time talking about Israel? If no one can defend Israel from baseless attacks, without people complaining that they don't care about America, then why is it ok for people to keep attacking Israel? Why doesn't anyone ask Candace or Tucker or any of these people to talk about America? Why the double standard? The only reason anyone has to defend Israel, is because so many others won't stop talking about them and blaming every little thing on them. Something bad happens, it's the Jews' fault. It can never be the people who actually did the bad thing, it's always that the Jews made them do it.
re: Verge is nothing more than a YES MAN!
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/5/25 at 6:38 am to HighRoller
quote:
That’s not true at all verge is a lazy, good ole boy hire. Why get rid of Woodward to hire the right hand guy? Because he’ll do what they tell him. The no search is frustrating. A school like LSU should be talking to people around the country.
You don't get my point. No matter who they would have brought in, people would just say "Landry is controlling him". Could they have hired someone better? I don't know. Were you in on the meetings to know who they called, and who might have said no? Because I know I wasn't there. I'm not any more excited about this than you are, but I'm not going to assume that Verge is a yes man, and I'm also not buying that people were going to trust any other hire, so long as they believe Landry is in control.
re: Verge is nothing more than a YES MAN!
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/5/25 at 5:49 am to bleedpurpleandgold23
I really don't care to engage with any speculative "yes man" talk. The people who hate Landry were going to say that about any AD who was hired. We all know who the coaching candidates are, and it's going to come down to who's interested, and what is LSU willing to pay. No matter who the AD is.
We were hamstrung years ago by an administration that wouldn't pay up. We're all going to find out together if this "new" administration is going to bring us back to those days, or bring us forward.
We were hamstrung years ago by an administration that wouldn't pay up. We're all going to find out together if this "new" administration is going to bring us back to those days, or bring us forward.
re: The ATL Offseason Thread: New Manager Edition
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/4/25 at 12:54 am to Broski
I obviously am not inside the man's head to know exactly what he's thinking, but I do think that it is hubris that has driven much of his rationale. Everyone crowned him for the 2021 deadline which was, indeed, very lucky in a lot of ways. I give him credit for at least doing something as opposed to nothing that year, but it could have easily been a nothing-burger, that somehow turned to gold for a couple of months.
But anyway, that praise he received seems to have filled him with this sense that he is an outside the box thinker, who won't be held hostage by star players, because he somehow knows the right "fit" every time. Despite numerous failures since that deadline, something like what happened with the acquisition of Chris Sale, where the guy couldn't stay healthy and the Red Sox were just happy to offload only a little bit of his salary for one unproven prospect, made AA feel once again that he is smarter than everyone else. But that was just bad business by the Red Sox. If you are retaining the vast majority of the salary, and not getting a high level prospect in return, why not just keep him and hope he gets and stays healthy? Instead of asking that question, media pundits hailed the "genius" of Alex.
And the way he keeps bringing back players from that 2021 team, who are clearly not performing well, just proves how lucky he was the first time. He thinks he can do the same thing over and over again, and it does not work anymore. It shouldn't have worked the first time, but that was fine, because he was mainly just trying to find fill ins for injuries. But then to break up parts of your core with the same philosophy is, I agree, flirting with malpractice.
But anyway, that praise he received seems to have filled him with this sense that he is an outside the box thinker, who won't be held hostage by star players, because he somehow knows the right "fit" every time. Despite numerous failures since that deadline, something like what happened with the acquisition of Chris Sale, where the guy couldn't stay healthy and the Red Sox were just happy to offload only a little bit of his salary for one unproven prospect, made AA feel once again that he is smarter than everyone else. But that was just bad business by the Red Sox. If you are retaining the vast majority of the salary, and not getting a high level prospect in return, why not just keep him and hope he gets and stays healthy? Instead of asking that question, media pundits hailed the "genius" of Alex.
And the way he keeps bringing back players from that 2021 team, who are clearly not performing well, just proves how lucky he was the first time. He thinks he can do the same thing over and over again, and it does not work anymore. It shouldn't have worked the first time, but that was fine, because he was mainly just trying to find fill ins for injuries. But then to break up parts of your core with the same philosophy is, I agree, flirting with malpractice.
re: The ATL Offseason Thread: New Manager Edition
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/3/25 at 11:47 pm to Broski
quote:
My issue is not necessarily that he traded away Shea Langeliers, Drew Waters and Kyle Muller. The latter two never amounted to much of anything. My issue is that he exhausted the trade bait and downgraded at first base because he got into a pissing contest with Freddie after not negotiating with him prior to the 2021 season.
That's what my point was about trading away too many prospects at once, and not having any depth to call up or trade from. Because yeah, prospects are lottery tickets in most cases, and no one knows what they'll do, but until they prove that they aren't major league talents, you have chips to trade in when you need something.
But AA traded for big names, when we already had guys in house, as you were talking about, which depleted the system, and didn't improve the roster. I've got no issue with making trades that make sense. I didn't think the trades he made in Toronto were wise, and trading for Murphy, and allowing the Freddie situation to get to a point where he backed himself into a trade for Olson, was clearly not wise.
re: The ATL Offseason Thread: New Manager Edition
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/3/25 at 11:23 pm to Broski
quote:
It's why their farm ranking didn't bottom out like ours did after we graduated and traded all of our prospects away from 2022/23.
This, right here, is why I opposed the hiring of AA as soon as it happened. All I heard about was what a genius he supposedly was, but I watched him torpedo Toronto's farm system to trade for some aging "stars" to bolster a team that went nowhere in the playoffs. I looked at our, at the time, very strong farm system and said to myself "this guy is going to trade this all away". And that's what he did, to a large degree.
It's not that you should never trade prospects. Obviously, there are times to do it. But if you do too much of it, too quickly, you are suddenly banking on everyone on your major league roster panning out and staying healthy, because you have no organizational depth to call up or trade from. Because you went "all in" on a couple of guys in trades.
re: Braves new manager
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/3/25 at 11:04 pm to BHTiger
Absolutely incredible...
re: Trump tells the dept of war to strike if attacks on Christians in Nigeria don’t stop
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/2/25 at 1:43 am to RelentlessAnalysis
There is more than one group killing Christians in Nigeria. And the estimates you just gave over the last "20 years" is actually easily the estimate over the last 10 to 15 years.
Does it meet the definition of genocide? Presently, no. And I really don't care. As a Christian, myself, I think that any country that calls itself a Christian nation (understanding that not everyone here is Christian, but it is undoubtedly the dominant worldview throughout the western world) should do what it can to protect fellow Christians, and to protect, in general, people who are violently oppressed. That does not always have to mean war. We can't be in every place at once. That's why Christian organizations send aid to a lot of foreign countries to at least attempt to ease their suffering.
But the rise of atrocities against Christians in Nigeria is rapidly increasing. Viewing the problem over a long range of time ignores the present escalation. I think that's why Trump is threatening action now. And I'm in favor of it.
Does it meet the definition of genocide? Presently, no. And I really don't care. As a Christian, myself, I think that any country that calls itself a Christian nation (understanding that not everyone here is Christian, but it is undoubtedly the dominant worldview throughout the western world) should do what it can to protect fellow Christians, and to protect, in general, people who are violently oppressed. That does not always have to mean war. We can't be in every place at once. That's why Christian organizations send aid to a lot of foreign countries to at least attempt to ease their suffering.
But the rise of atrocities against Christians in Nigeria is rapidly increasing. Viewing the problem over a long range of time ignores the present escalation. I think that's why Trump is threatening action now. And I'm in favor of it.
re: Trump tells the dept of war to strike if attacks on Christians in Nigeria don’t stop
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/2/25 at 1:10 am to Powerman
quote:
Wonder how much their oil reserves factor into this calculus
I wonder when you forgot that America was supposed to be a force for good, and not just a place for us to bubble wrap ourselves from the rest of the world. We strike an enemy in Iran, people complain. We help Israel try to defeat Hamas, people complain. Now our president wants to liberate Christians in Nigeria from slaughter, and you're thinking about oil?
Can we ever do anything outside of this country, without there being some kind of conspiracy? We can either do something about the extremists who are trying rip apart Christians and Jews everywhere, or we can isolate ourselves and wait for the world to close in around us as our enemies take it all over. They hate western culture. They hate everything that resembles it. They won't stop if we just sit back and do nothing.
re: With some Saban smoke in the rumor sphere a contrast between him and BK
Posted by Metaloctopus on 11/1/25 at 1:56 am to theCAW
That's not only a contrast between those two guys, but a contrast between a lot of fans who get mad when any of us critique performance after a win, and people who just call it like it is.
Anyone should be able to know the difference between winning, because you were fortunate you played a bad team, and actually playing well enough to compete with good teams. Saban could say it out loud, but fans just get bashed by other fans for speaking the obvious.
Anyone should be able to know the difference between winning, because you were fortunate you played a bad team, and actually playing well enough to compete with good teams. Saban could say it out loud, but fans just get bashed by other fans for speaking the obvious.
re: Check In if you said there is no damn way BK and/or Woodward would be let go in 2025...
Posted by Metaloctopus on 10/31/25 at 11:58 pm to TexasTiger33
I didn't think there was anyway they would eat that buyout any earlier than maybe after next season, unless we went 0-12, and the boosters couldn't stomach another season with Kelly. Didn't think 5-3 would do it, but I certainly believe it was time for a change, if someone was willing to pay the buyout.
As for Woodward, I didn't really think about it. Wouldn't say I saw it coming, but It's not terribly shocking.
As for Woodward, I didn't really think about it. Wouldn't say I saw it coming, but It's not terribly shocking.
Popular
1












