Metaloctopus
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | Louisiana |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | All things LSU, drums, guitar, shooting pool and other random things that aren't worth listing. |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 7158 |
| Registered on: | 11/1/2018 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 10/1/26 at 2:15 am to willymeaux
quote:
You're coming off as someone who likes to hear themselves talk. VADawg and Broski laid it out for you but you don't want to say this offense is lacking a lot for some reason and then respond by filibustering with a long post that says the same thing over and over again.
The Braves offense had ample opportunity to put the game away today and failed to do so by stranding a boatload of runners on base with less than 2 outs. It's a problem that has been plaguing this team for multiple years now,
This isn't 2023 anymore, the home run defense doesn't fly anymore, literally.
If you can read a thread involving the person I was talking to and conclude that I come off as someone who likes to hear himself talk, then you aren't paying attention. My point was clear. I at no point avoided saying what YOU want me to say about this offense. I "laid it out" for both of those posters what this offense is, and one of them wants to argue till he's blue in the face that I somehow defended the offense, when all I said is that those other teams were lucky to get good matchups, and that a lot of these teams have the same offensive problems.
Saying other teams have problems is not equal to saying "we're good, nothing to see here". But somehow, a couple of you seem to take it that way. Ok, friend. You want to pile on and argue with me that we're the only struggling offense who relies on home runs? How did the Phillies win the game yesterday?
Welcome to modern day offense. I don't like it any more than you do. But here we are, and I am somehow being controversial for pointing it out.
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/30/26 at 7:30 pm to Broski
quote:
I'm going to be condescending on a message board when someone can't understand the initial point and then throws out personal attacks.
No, the entire problem, as I just pointed out in my previous post, is that YOU missed the initial point. You completely took everything out of context, just to be a contrarian. And my anger has everything to do with the fact that you do this every...single...time. You think these are personal attacks? I'm telling you what you are. I have held my tongue for years, trying not to say what I want to say, but it's insult after insult from you, and you never fail to miss the point.
There is nothing that I am "failing" to handle. I've been very honest about what this offense is. You can't deal with that. You are the very person who always tells us that the season is over during every bad stretch. You don't deal in reality, you deal in emotions. My irritation right now is not a spur of the moment, overreaction like you are notorious for. These are well founded frustrations with years of your poor attitude ruining this board.
Do me a favor. Ignore my posts from now on. I will be ignoring yours.
Good day.
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/30/26 at 7:22 pm to Broski
quote:
Then you should understand why living and dying on the home run and only the home run is a recipe for a short postseason.
Again, there is no better statistic to qualify an offense than wOBA, and ours is bad... our offense is bad.
Sorry to tell you.
Your entire problem is that you are so bent on being a contrarian, that you can almost never see the point that people are making. I never said this was a "good" offense. I just finished telling you that I have said for years that it's not a good playoff formula. But it's a formula that works enough when you aren't facing elite pitching all the time, which is WHY I said that those other teams were lucky with their matchups. We're not getting those kind of matchups. and don't figure to get them the rest of the way, either.
You totally let my point blow right over your head, and went straight into beating a strawman point that I never argued.
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/30/26 at 7:16 pm to Broski
quote:
Feel better now?
Don't ask me your condescending questions. Either address what I say, or find something else to do.
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/30/26 at 7:15 pm to Broski
quote:
A toddler that understands the nuance of advanced metrics.
Sorry that you don't.
I understand metrics. Those help you understand variances over smaller and longer sample sizes. We're talking about an entire season. Advanced metrics don't say that this team is anything other than what their runs scored say they are.
They are weighed down by a low on base percentage, but held up by a high slugging percentage. It's not a good formula for playoff baseball, and I've said that for years. But we won game 1 by doing what we've done all year
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/30/26 at 7:11 pm to Broski
quote:
Holy shite, this is dumb.
I bet you think a pitcher is as good as his W-L record too, huh?
No, Broski, because pitchers are as good as the amount of runs they keep off the board. Runs, are runs. You are arguing that scoring runs means less than any other stat, when every stat is just part of the process of how a team scores runs.
A pitcher isn't good because he gets a "win" when he gives up 5 runs a game. Hitters don't get "wins" attached to them for being on a team that relies on pitching. But runs are scored by driving in runs, and this team finished 8th in that category.
You are making yourself look worse by the minute.
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/30/26 at 7:07 pm to Broski
quote:
You brought a chopstick (runs) to a bazooka fight.
A bazooka fight? Arguing with you is like arguing with a toddler. You are a self absorbed, know-nothing, blow hard. Only you think you ever "win" an argument.
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/30/26 at 7:05 pm to Broski
quote:
Says I don't know baseball then uses runs to qualify how good an offense is.
What an outstanding self-own. Thanks for making this easy
That you don't realize the immense hypocrisy of claiming "self-own" after you just posted that comment, is the greatest example you could have given to show exactly how little you know.
Runs are literally the ONLY stat that matters. There are lots of different philosophies to score runs, but runs, Broski, all count as runs. If we lead baseball in batting average and on base base, but had no slug and finished 10th in runs scored, are you going to argue that the team that scored less runs is better than the team that scored more?
What an insane thing to say. "This guy thinks runs determine good offense, hahaha".
Why do I bother with you?
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/30/26 at 7:00 pm to Broski
quote:
Oh my goodness
And there he goes, ladies and gentlemen. Ignoring statistical facts that show what ignorant narrative he's pushing at a given moment to be either completely false, or highly exaggerated, and he responds with a laughing emoji.
You're a child.
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/30/26 at 6:56 pm to Broski
quote:
Just an absolute dogshit take.
You are easily the worst poster on this site. You know pretty much nothing about baseball. So this is a pretty ironic "take" coming from you.
quote:
Calling this offense streaky because you're afraid to say it's bad as if that makes you a bad fan or something.
I said the entire lineup is streaky. How about reading what I say? It's not like everybody goes into a slump, and then everybody gets hot, all at the same time. But there have been months this season where we had enough guys hot to score a good number of runs.
They finished 8th in runs in baseball. What part of that do you not comprehend? Good offense? No. Bad offense? Sometimes. Bad all the time? Clearly not. It is a frustrating offense, because they don't take walks, and rely way too much on slug. but you don't finished 8th in runs if you are totally inept.
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/30/26 at 6:48 pm to Broski
quote:
Again... one of the worst wOBA's in the league.
You're way overvaluing this offense. It's the worst of the teams left in the postseason.
I'm not overvaluing them, I'm stating a fact. It's a lineup built for slug, and if they slug, they score, if they don't, well, they don't.
Was Riley's homer a can of corn yesterday? It doesn't matter how runs or scored, it matters that you score them, and you don't give games away late. Harper drops a fly ball, but Olson also hits a rocket that should have cleared the bases, but finds a glove. We can play the "luck" game all day.
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/30/26 at 6:45 pm to VADawg
quote:
This team has gotten steamrolled by dogshit starters all season. The offense is arse.
We scored 5 runs yesterday, and we didn't face a single pitcher who was dog crap. You're going to have to eek out runs, even if you have a good offense, when you face good pitching. It would be a heck of a lot easier to score 8 or 9 runs if we had Matt Boyd on the other side.
Because yes, we can get shut down by a rookie who no one's ever heard of, but we have also lit those guys up at times. It's no different for some of those other teams in the playoffs. They had a random good day. I'm not worried about that. I'm far more concerned that we don't have the starting pitching depth to match up with other top starters, and we blew Mahle's start.
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/30/26 at 6:40 pm to Broski
Dude, I don't recall saying the Braves offense was some amazing force of nature. I said those teams got lucky with matchups. And that is simply the truth. Those teams, most times, struggle to score just like the Braves do. They wouldn't have put up those runs if they were facing decent pitching.
Our offense is the same way. They can suck against a bad pitcher, or they can score 15 runs. The whole lineup is streaky. But they won't hit good pitching. You had a lead in this game. and you blew it with a bad decision.
Our offense is the same way. They can suck against a bad pitcher, or they can score 15 runs. The whole lineup is streaky. But they won't hit good pitching. You had a lead in this game. and you blew it with a bad decision.
re: The ATL Thread - 9/30 - The Mahle Game
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/30/26 at 6:26 pm to hiltacular
quote:
ETA padres score 8, Yankees 9. This team cannot do that.
The Padres faced Matt Boyd, and the Yankees scored 8 of their runs against the Red Sox unimpressive bullpen. Those aren't good offensive teams, either, they just got lucky with their matchups.
We lost this game because of a terrible decision to put Lee in the game.
re: Extremely nervous about this offense vs Texas
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/28/26 at 12:21 am to king47
Well Texas doesn't look impressive on offense, so I think our defense will give us plenty of chance to win that game.
re: Leavitt made NFL throws tonight
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/27/26 at 7:04 am to Brotorious
quote:
I call a spade a spade as well….
Dumb fricks such as yourself.
Clearly you do not. I, like others, pointed out the things he was doing wrong. That's called objectivity. And our coach agreed. So you don't actually know what you're going on about. And you are arrogant.
re: Leavitt made NFL throws tonight
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/27/26 at 5:13 am to Brotorious
Some of us called a spade a spade. We said he gets happy feet and gives up on his progressions too soon. He got injured and had to stay in the pocket, started to show some patience, and made the throws. Go figure.
And who also commented on Leavitt's injury making him stop running around and actually make some throws? None other than Lane Kiffin. Is he also a "retard"? Or else, who are you calling retards?
And who also commented on Leavitt's injury making him stop running around and actually make some throws? None other than Lane Kiffin. Is he also a "retard"? Or else, who are you calling retards?
re: I can tell how different this RECRUITING BOARD is now….
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/21/26 at 7:18 pm to Juan Betanzos
It's partly that, but interest was already dying down due to recruits increasingly playing games and decommitting at the last second. And now, with money involved (over the table) "commitments" have never meant less. Throw in the portal, and yeah, it's hard to get jacked up about high school recruiting. I still care about it, but I'm not following it very closely.
re: Crusades are coming back to the west
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/17/26 at 1:36 am to 3down10
My gosh, this post is ate up with complete gibberish.
Who have I murdered? When did the government carry out my sins? I have already addressed this, and yet you repeat the same lies. I don't "claim" they want to kill us. THEY outright declare their intention to carry out the killing of all non-Muslims, but especially Christians and Jews.
No different than the pharisees? They killed the Messiah, because they didn't believe and were ate up with pride, and angered that Jesus called them out on all of their hypocrisy. Going to war against Muslim terrorists for carrying out senseless attacks on civilians is justified. There is no comparison.
Of course it is a right for all. But those Muslims aren't acting in self defense. They are always the aggressor.
This is incoherent. You are still being obtuse over that point that I made. I didn't say that you called them cowards, I simply posed a question to you, based on your own logic. If "fear" of being overthrown by an enemy is seen as a negative in your eyes, then logically, you are implying that anyone who acts on that "fear" is a coward. So I asked you a very simple question: Are our soldiers cowards? Are we cowards for every war we've fought in? Or is it only cowardice if it involves killing people of a specific religion?
You keep saying I'm "afraid" because I want to defend my country and my family. You can't male up your mind. you say that self-defense is a God given right, but then you immediately flip and say that a person who wants to defend himself is just afraid and wants to sacrifice lives. Did you ever read the Old Testament? There's a lot of commanded killing in there. Would you like to argue with God over those killings?
And you last point in that paragraph doesn't even make sense. It's just random words thrown together with no truth.
This is wrong on so many levels. That you are naive enough to believe that "Only your own government" can take our freedom, you know nothing about world history.
Why do you keep talking about this war? This conversation was about a proposed modern day crusade. The war isn't a crusade. It is a response to multiple actions by our enemies. First was the attack on October 7th. That's the Israel-Hamas side of the wars in the Middle East. Then, Iran was warned to shut down operations on it's nuclear weapons production. They were given 60 days. 60 days went by, Iran did not comply, and bombing ensued. Then the Iranian regime killed thousands of civilian protesters, which brought further action on our part.
A crusade would be an all-out pursuit by Christians, specifically, against these tyrannical Muslims. It's something I don't believe will ever happen, but that was the hypothetical, and you keep talking about the war, of which, you don't even have your facts straight. You have liberal/Muslim talking points that you spit out with no effort to back any of it with data.
As for having troops in their "holy lands", there is nothing holy about Islam. We don't owe them respect because they call something holy. Their religion is evil, and their repeated acts of terror or why our troops are there. We didn't invade a peaceful people.
Who is this US puppet you speak of, and where is the evidence that he was acting on our behalf? They didn't rebel against a puppet, they rebelled against the terrorist regime who runs that country, not the pseudo government that is entirely toothless. So there you go again, not knowing your facts.
Most of this is once again incoherent. But the part about judging "extremists" is a tired leftist tactic. Have you ever read any part of the Quran? The terrorists aren't the "extremists", they are the true followers of the false prophet Muhammad. Everything they do is commanded in their "holy" scriptures. And they are not in the minority. They are not the entirety of all Muslims, but they are certainly the majority. They hate us, they hate western culture, and they want us dead, and have murdered countless Christians where they are. And make no mistake, this infiltration into our government has and end game where they do in this country what they have done for centuries in their native lands.
I don't care if you don't believe that, or claim that you "aren't afraid". What you are is ignorant and passive, which is not courage. It's easy not to fear what you are too blind to see coming. I don't fear in any sort of way that disrupts my daily life. That kind of fear, the fear that controls, is cowardice. Healthy fear is not cowardice. You don't walk out into traffic because you know certain awaits. It's common sense. And when danger lurks from abroad, likewise, we should have the foresight to recognize it and act accordingly, if and when it becomes necessary.
quote:
"killed in war"
Yeah, you use the government to carry out your sins because you think it means you didn't do it.
You murder them. Using the government to carry out your sins is no different than how the pharisees killed Jesus.
You want to kill them because you claim they want to kill you.
But you are the one that is supporting the "war" over there to kill them.
How are you different? Because you have a government to kill for you?
Who have I murdered? When did the government carry out my sins? I have already addressed this, and yet you repeat the same lies. I don't "claim" they want to kill us. THEY outright declare their intention to carry out the killing of all non-Muslims, but especially Christians and Jews.
No different than the pharisees? They killed the Messiah, because they didn't believe and were ate up with pride, and angered that Jesus called them out on all of their hypocrisy. Going to war against Muslim terrorists for carrying out senseless attacks on civilians is justified. There is no comparison.
quote:
Self defense is a God given right.
And that includes them no matter if you like it or not.
Of course it is a right for all. But those Muslims aren't acting in self defense. They are always the aggressor.
quote:
I served, I said nothing of people in military being cowards, nor did I remotely suggest it. You are the one with the fear who wants to sacrifice their lives and the resources of your fellow citizens.
Those countries ignorantly invited them because they have shitty leadership. Not because they didn't go to the middle east and kill them first.
This is incoherent. You are still being obtuse over that point that I made. I didn't say that you called them cowards, I simply posed a question to you, based on your own logic. If "fear" of being overthrown by an enemy is seen as a negative in your eyes, then logically, you are implying that anyone who acts on that "fear" is a coward. So I asked you a very simple question: Are our soldiers cowards? Are we cowards for every war we've fought in? Or is it only cowardice if it involves killing people of a specific religion?
You keep saying I'm "afraid" because I want to defend my country and my family. You can't male up your mind. you say that self-defense is a God given right, but then you immediately flip and say that a person who wants to defend himself is just afraid and wants to sacrifice lives. Did you ever read the Old Testament? There's a lot of commanded killing in there. Would you like to argue with God over those killings?
And you last point in that paragraph doesn't even make sense. It's just random words thrown together with no truth.
quote:
The only ones that can take your freedoms are your own government. Which they do often and are working full time to take more.
Among the reasons they cite for attacking, religion and culture is not among them. Having troops in their holy lands, bases in the middle east, attacking their countries - those are the actual reasons.
They had a US puppet before. He was a brutal dictator who imprisoned and killed his opponents and so forth. That was the reason they rebeled. If we were over there for "freedom" that wouldn't have happened. We are over there for the petro dollar and that Iran will sell it's oil in Yuan, which is bad for the western banking cartel. It gets support because of people like you.
This is wrong on so many levels. That you are naive enough to believe that "Only your own government" can take our freedom, you know nothing about world history.
Why do you keep talking about this war? This conversation was about a proposed modern day crusade. The war isn't a crusade. It is a response to multiple actions by our enemies. First was the attack on October 7th. That's the Israel-Hamas side of the wars in the Middle East. Then, Iran was warned to shut down operations on it's nuclear weapons production. They were given 60 days. 60 days went by, Iran did not comply, and bombing ensued. Then the Iranian regime killed thousands of civilian protesters, which brought further action on our part.
A crusade would be an all-out pursuit by Christians, specifically, against these tyrannical Muslims. It's something I don't believe will ever happen, but that was the hypothetical, and you keep talking about the war, of which, you don't even have your facts straight. You have liberal/Muslim talking points that you spit out with no effort to back any of it with data.
As for having troops in their "holy lands", there is nothing holy about Islam. We don't owe them respect because they call something holy. Their religion is evil, and their repeated acts of terror or why our troops are there. We didn't invade a peaceful people.
Who is this US puppet you speak of, and where is the evidence that he was acting on our behalf? They didn't rebel against a puppet, they rebelled against the terrorist regime who runs that country, not the pseudo government that is entirely toothless. So there you go again, not knowing your facts.
quote:
I'm sure most Christians are not like that. However at the same time most Muslims aren't like that either.
But you judge them on the extremists, then ask not to be judged on Christian extremists.
Do you kill your neighbor based on how they plant your crops even though it's in the bible?
You still use government to do it. You just don't put your name on it anymore. The reasons behind it aren't really changing though.
Most of this is once again incoherent. But the part about judging "extremists" is a tired leftist tactic. Have you ever read any part of the Quran? The terrorists aren't the "extremists", they are the true followers of the false prophet Muhammad. Everything they do is commanded in their "holy" scriptures. And they are not in the minority. They are not the entirety of all Muslims, but they are certainly the majority. They hate us, they hate western culture, and they want us dead, and have murdered countless Christians where they are. And make no mistake, this infiltration into our government has and end game where they do in this country what they have done for centuries in their native lands.
I don't care if you don't believe that, or claim that you "aren't afraid". What you are is ignorant and passive, which is not courage. It's easy not to fear what you are too blind to see coming. I don't fear in any sort of way that disrupts my daily life. That kind of fear, the fear that controls, is cowardice. Healthy fear is not cowardice. You don't walk out into traffic because you know certain awaits. It's common sense. And when danger lurks from abroad, likewise, we should have the foresight to recognize it and act accordingly, if and when it becomes necessary.
re: Crusades are coming back to the west
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/16/26 at 11:30 pm to 3down10
quote:
The number is way less than the number of Muslims killed by Christians and Israel.
But I guess they have no right to self defense.
This is an outright lie, and you know full well that it is. Muslims aren't murdered, they are killed in war, a war that they started by attacking Jews. Christians meanwhile, are being murdered everywhere, and none of them have incited any of it. You should be ashamed of this disgusting lie.
quote:
I have 4 kids and 8 grandkids.
I said nothing about being passive. Starting wars is not defending yourself. In fact, it's the opposite of that and what puts you in danger to begin with.
You didn't have to say anything about being passive. Your words demonstrate that you are overwhelmingly passive. You say "starting wars". Another lie. The Muslims have been at war against Christians and Jews, not by self defense, but by religious decree, since their religion was founded. Or do you know nothing about the Quran?
quote:
Not sure where you get they are cowards, it seems the opposite even if our government miss uses them.
The most common way people sin is by using their government. For example they used the Romans to kill Jesus.
You need justification and when you are the aggressor you have none.
Are you kidding with this? I did not say they were cowards, I'm asking you if they were cowards, by your own definition of "fear", simply by acting in defense of freedom. The Revolutionary war was fought over unfair taxes, but we're just scared little men if we see need to go to battle with an enemy who wants to destroy us? By the way, this isn't only about America, this is about the west. They are taking over western countries everywhere, and the results have already been devastating, but it can get a lot worse.
And we would not be the "aggressor". When Muslims are murdering our people, it is a response to that. Your lie that more Muslims are being killed is embarrassing.
quote:
Again, I never said this. You have a God given right to self defense. That doesn't mean you get to kill anyone in the world you think might be a threat....and their neighbors who are innocent to begin with. But you don't care about anything than saving yourself.
And here we go again. We don't "think" they are a threat. They have proven themselves to be the greatest threat to western civilization in history, and are gaining more influence in our governments every year. And who are these "neighbors" that you speak of, and who's killing them? Do you just make things up as you go? You think I only care about myself? My entire premise is about protecting the freedoms of decent people. I have gone on these boards and defended Iranian citizens, who all evidence suggests that they don't support their terrorist leaders and want to be free. I have argued for the annihilation of the Iranian regime so that their citizens can be free.
But what would you know of that? You have your shameless talking points, and nothing to stand on but false claims.
quote:
I see Christians on this very forum supporting the killing of Muslims every day. Sometimes people talking about dropping nukes on 90+ million people.
That is literally calling for the death of Muslims because they are Muslims, innocent or otherwise.
And Christians have used government to kill hundreds of thousands of them, if not millions.
But you excuse yourself because you will say "that's not Christianity, that's government" even while you sit here and defend and support the actions.
I don't support any person who says that we should indiscriminately drop Nukes. That would kill not only non terrorist muslims, but non-muslims everywhere around it. This discussion is not about dropping Nukes. You've brought in the comments of a few random keyboard warriors to make a broad claim about Christians that has nothing to do with the discussion at hand.
Christians have not used "government" to kill Muslims in many centuries. And in those days, war was a constant reality. It was a fight for survival, and yes, atrocities occurred. They even killed some fellow Christians. This was at the direction of the Catholic church. There is a reason why protestants, of which I am one, exist. We have a lot of problems with the Catholic church. But this isn't hundreds of years ago, anymore. This is today, and today the Muslim empire is more expansive than it has ever been. I'm not calling for a war response in this moment, but there may come a time when it is necessary. And that time can't be when they are already at our doorsteps with guns at our heads.
re: Landen Clark gives LSU their best chance at beating Ole Miss
Posted by Metaloctopus on 9/16/26 at 10:35 pm to Jugular Joe
I'm not here to bash Landen Clark, but all these takes about Clark being better all stem from late game, vs backups, performances that they've seen from him. He hasn't been tested at all.
Popular
2












