
Bucks2TigerFan
Favorite team: | Ohio State ![]() |
Location: | |
Biography: | |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 826 |
Registered on: | 6/8/2018 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: All time records vs AP 1. How many does your team have ?
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 5/4/25 at 12:35 am
quote:
Purdue is spooky as frick, 40% win rate against #1 over a good sample size is insane
Wonder how many of those were ruining OSU's season
Not a one of them was a win against the Buckeyes at #1.
They had 4 wins against Notre Dame in 1950, 1954, 1965, and 1967,
1 win against Michigan State in 1957,
1 win against Minnesota in 1960,
and 1 win against Michigan in 1976.
Purdue has spoiled Ohio State's season a number of times when they were highly rated, but never when the Buckeyes were #1.
re: Explain these two rankings to me please. I am open to solid arguments changing my mind.
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/4/19 at 4:28 pm
You may not like this, but the committee looks at a lot of things, here is a short summary of why Wisconsin might be higher than Florida in their eyes.
Florida beat #11 Auburn, 24-13, lost at #2 LSU, 28-42, and to #4 Georgia, 17-24, so they are 1-2 (.333) against ranked teams, played 2 FCS teams, which is a negative, and beat 3 teams with a winning record.
Wisconsin beat #14 Michigan, 35-14, #16 Iowa, 24-22, and at #18 Minnesota, 38-17, lost at #1 Ohio State, 7-38, at unranked 6-6 Illinois, 23-24, so they are 3-1 (.750) against ranked teams, played no FCS teams, which is a positive, beat 4 teams with a winning record.
Overall Wisconsin’s resume comes out ahead on those facts. But the committee looks at far more.
The committee uses the SportSource Analytics Rankings Tool to compare teams, which you can do at https://sportsourceanalytics.com/rankingtool/
I started a thread that shows how you can play around and look at different things with that tool at:
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/more-sports/how-the-playoff-committee-uses-data-to-place-teams/87166480/
Florida beat #11 Auburn, 24-13, lost at #2 LSU, 28-42, and to #4 Georgia, 17-24, so they are 1-2 (.333) against ranked teams, played 2 FCS teams, which is a negative, and beat 3 teams with a winning record.
Wisconsin beat #14 Michigan, 35-14, #16 Iowa, 24-22, and at #18 Minnesota, 38-17, lost at #1 Ohio State, 7-38, at unranked 6-6 Illinois, 23-24, so they are 3-1 (.750) against ranked teams, played no FCS teams, which is a positive, beat 4 teams with a winning record.
Overall Wisconsin’s resume comes out ahead on those facts. But the committee looks at far more.
The committee uses the SportSource Analytics Rankings Tool to compare teams, which you can do at https://sportsourceanalytics.com/rankingtool/
I started a thread that shows how you can play around and look at different things with that tool at:
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/more-sports/how-the-playoff-committee-uses-data-to-place-teams/87166480/
re: What an 8 Team Playoff would look like using 12/03 CFP Ranking
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/4/19 at 4:15 pm
quote:
2014- #6 11-1 TCU would have absolutely had a good shot
2015- #7 11-1 Ohio state would absolutely have a good shot
2016- 4 was enough
2017-#5 ohio state and #6 auburn absolutely could have won it
2018- #5 uga and #6 ohio state absolutely could have obe it
only 1 year of the playoffs so far can you say there werent other teams with a very legit change of winning it
Exactly right! Every team you listed would have had a good shot to win it all, they just didn't get a chance. They lost it in the committee room because only 4 could be chosen.
That's why I think it should be 8!
How the Playoff Committee uses Data to Place Teams
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/4/19 at 4:11 pm
First off, let me say I hate that the committee has no firm, fixed, transparent criteria that one can easily judge and see how they got what they got. I would prefer a list of the criteria, even it was 100 items long, with a weighting that would require a computer to keep track of it all, but at least all would know and could figure out what is going on, but that’s not what we have.
The CFP committee uses a company called SportSource Analytics to provide them with data to compare and rank the teams. If you have ever looked up college football team stats on https://cfbstats.com/, you are using their data.
One could compare two teams, say Wisconsin and Florida just using the data at that website.
Their standard data sheet for Florida is at this link: https://cfbstats.com/2019/team/235/index.html
and here’s the one for Wisconsin: https://cfbstats.com/2019/team/796/index.html
You could look at the two of them side by side, and if you did so, you’d see that Wisconsin is better in more rows than Florida.
But that’s tedious just for two teams, and almost impossible for 25, so instead go straight to the SportSource Analytics Rankings Tool (at least the free one open to the public, I’m sure the committee’s version has more bells and whistles) and compare for yourself at https://sportsourceanalytics.com/rankingtool/
In the base ranking there are 13 attributes that can be weighted however you want. In the advanced setting there are 19.
Here is what their default advanced comparison looks like with all 19 sliders at the default 50%
Notice Wisconsin is #4 and Florida is #11 using this advanced base ranking.
But the committee does not just look at this, they play around with settings and look at many different things.
For instance, what is strength of schedule? it comes out WI #9, FL #36 (set all sliders to 0, put SoS at 100)
If you just hit reset to go back to the unadvanced base comparison (all 13 sliders at 50), it’s WI #5, FL #18.
You can do this for any one, or any number of parameters and see what the committee sees.
Say you want to look at just the 4 opponent adjusted rankings (Opp. Adj. Scoring Offense/ Defense & Total Offense/Total Defense) in their advance set, set all the other 15 sliders to 0, the result is WI #3, FL #5
You can play around all day long and Wisconsin beats Flotida more often than not on their ranking tool. That’s why, with the exact same 10-2 record, Wisconsin ends up ranked one spot ahead of Florida.
This is the paint by numbers comparison approach they use, we just never know what sure what numbers they value more than others and how consistent they are.
The CFP committee uses a company called SportSource Analytics to provide them with data to compare and rank the teams. If you have ever looked up college football team stats on https://cfbstats.com/, you are using their data.
One could compare two teams, say Wisconsin and Florida just using the data at that website.
Their standard data sheet for Florida is at this link: https://cfbstats.com/2019/team/235/index.html
and here’s the one for Wisconsin: https://cfbstats.com/2019/team/796/index.html
You could look at the two of them side by side, and if you did so, you’d see that Wisconsin is better in more rows than Florida.
But that’s tedious just for two teams, and almost impossible for 25, so instead go straight to the SportSource Analytics Rankings Tool (at least the free one open to the public, I’m sure the committee’s version has more bells and whistles) and compare for yourself at https://sportsourceanalytics.com/rankingtool/
In the base ranking there are 13 attributes that can be weighted however you want. In the advanced setting there are 19.
Here is what their default advanced comparison looks like with all 19 sliders at the default 50%

Notice Wisconsin is #4 and Florida is #11 using this advanced base ranking.
But the committee does not just look at this, they play around with settings and look at many different things.
For instance, what is strength of schedule? it comes out WI #9, FL #36 (set all sliders to 0, put SoS at 100)
If you just hit reset to go back to the unadvanced base comparison (all 13 sliders at 50), it’s WI #5, FL #18.
You can do this for any one, or any number of parameters and see what the committee sees.
Say you want to look at just the 4 opponent adjusted rankings (Opp. Adj. Scoring Offense/ Defense & Total Offense/Total Defense) in their advance set, set all the other 15 sliders to 0, the result is WI #3, FL #5
You can play around all day long and Wisconsin beats Flotida more often than not on their ranking tool. That’s why, with the exact same 10-2 record, Wisconsin ends up ranked one spot ahead of Florida.
This is the paint by numbers comparison approach they use, we just never know what sure what numbers they value more than others and how consistent they are.
re: What an 8 Team Playoff would look like using 12/03 CFP Ranking
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/4/19 at 2:30 pm
quote:
The real kicker would be if teams from down here had to travel up north to play. Florida going to Wisconsin to play in December. I don't think they've played a non conference road game out of the state since the Kennedy administration. Talk about jumping right into the deep end.
Yep, just making Florida play Wisconsin in Madison and Bama play Utah in Salt Lake Lake City alone would be enough to make a 16 team playoff worthwhile
re: What an 8 Team Playoff would look like using 12/03 CFP Ranking
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/3/19 at 9:55 pm
quote:
WTF how many times are we gonna have to play OSU
It's Groundhog Day until you finally win it.
re: What an 8 Team Playoff would look like using 12/03 CFP Ranking
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/3/19 at 9:53 pm
For those who wonder what a 16 team bracket would look like using this week’s CFP rankings, here it is:
8 games and all of them are fresh with no repeats to games this year, although some have met in years past
8 games and all of them are fresh with no repeats to games this year, although some have met in years past

What an 8 Team Playoff would look like using 12/03 CFP Ranking
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/3/19 at 9:51 pm

Obviously, the final Top 8 after this weekend will look different than this Top 8, but even just using just this week’s ranking, who wouldn't want to see this playoff bracket?
More teams get a chance to have to win it on the field, not in the committee room, and that’s a plus to me.
There are some great match ups here right now, and even though changes will happen, this week's 8 team bracket is still an improvement over the 4 team bracket.
Having the 1st round games at the home stadiums of the Top 4 is a big reward for making the Top 4.
After next weekend, this bracket will be the 5 Power 5 conference champs and 3 at large teams, which is what many really want to see.
re: PFF All SEC Team. 10 LSU players make team
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/3/19 at 11:51 am
Burrow, Chase, and Stingley made their All American team as well.
LSU was the only team with 3 players on their list.
LINK
LSU was the only team with 3 players on their list.
LINK
re: Is Nick Saban the luckiest coach ever?
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/3/19 at 7:09 am
quote:
The reason he looks like a fish out of water is that the spread doesn't require a coach to be a great tactician. If your receiver is better than his defender you win, regardless of scheme. Saban has yet to find the answer for winning 1 on 1 matchups more consistently.
AN elite spread offense is Saban's kryptonite, he consistently loses to elite spread offense teams, from Oklahoma in 2013, Ohio State in 2014, Clemson in 2016 and 2018, and LSU in 2019. To say those teams didn't need or have great coaches is quite a stretch.
Also, many years Bama has been at or near the top in recruiting rankings, so surely lacking talented defenders weren't his only problem in those loses.
re: Jim Harbaugh is 47-12 against teams not named Ohio State
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/2/19 at 6:57 pm
quote:
Didn’t Michigan tie for the division last year? That’s what got them to the Peach right?
Yep. They were #4 in the CFP rankings before the Ohio State game, and and would have made the playoff had they won out. Instead they lost to Ohio State 62-39 and then Florida 41-15.
Except 2017, Harbaugh has had them one game off the division lead in the other years. He just can't get them over the hump.
re: Michigan basketball from unranked to #4
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/2/19 at 5:10 pm
quote:
I believe one of those wins was at LSU.
Yep, you are right, I looked it up, LSU was #2, UNLV was #1, and St. John's was #25 and Kansas beat them all in a six day period.
re: Michigan basketball from unranked to #4
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/2/19 at 4:58 pm
quote:
Never seen anything like it
According to MLive.com, Kansas was unranked to start the 1989-90 season but jumped to No. 4 after starting 4-0 with wins over three then-ranked teams, including Nos. 1 and 2, so it's happened at least once before.
LINK
re: ACC vs B1G Challenge (B1G Wins Challenge 8-6)
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/2/19 at 4:54 pm
quote:
Michigan going from unranked to 4th is wild. Has that ever happened before?
According to MLive.com, Kansas was unranked to start the 1989-90 season but jumped to No. 4 after starting 4-0 with wins over three then-ranked teams, including Nos. 1 and 2, so it's happened once before.
LINK
re: Jim Harbaugh is 47-12 against teams not named Ohio State
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/2/19 at 2:54 pm
Jim Harbaugh, Michigan's version of John Cooper.
re: ESPN FPI is hilarious
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/2/19 at 1:41 pm
FPI is is just mental masturbation for math and statistics geeks.
re: Michigan basketball from unranked to #4
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/2/19 at 12:55 pm
Be undefeated and beating 2 top 10 teams in 2 days should do that, especially since John Beilein didn't leave the cupboard bare when he left for the Cavs.
They were lower than they should have been and are now getting the respect they deserve.
They were lower than they should have been and are now getting the respect they deserve.
re: If Ohio State is #1 seed, who would give them a tougher match?
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/2/19 at 12:34 pm
quote:
I promise you OSU doesn't want to play Clemson in the semi-finals.
Exactly, playing Clemson should be tougher than playing Oklahoma, and all it takes is for the committee to seed Clemson at #4 according to their ranked wins resume, not the eye test.
re: If Ohio State is #1 seed, who would give them a tougher match?
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/2/19 at 12:24 pm
If you really want Ohio State to have the toughest semi if they're #1, you should root for Oklahoma to win and the committee to drop Clemson to #4 since Oklahoma will have 3 ranked wins and Clemson will have zero.
It would then be:
#1 OSU #4 Clemson in the Fiesta (to prevent Clemson home advantage in the Peach)
#2 LSU #3 Oklahoma in the Peach
although that means that LSU has to overcome the thing you said about OU's opponent's loses the final, which I don't think is really cast in stone, just like #1 or #3 never win isn't a rule either, although none has done it yet in 5 tries.
It would then be:
#1 OSU #4 Clemson in the Fiesta (to prevent Clemson home advantage in the Peach)
#2 LSU #3 Oklahoma in the Peach
although that means that LSU has to overcome the thing you said about OU's opponent's loses the final, which I don't think is really cast in stone, just like #1 or #3 never win isn't a rule either, although none has done it yet in 5 tries.
re: ACC vs B1G Challenge (B1G Wins Challenge 8-6)
Posted by Bucks2TigerFan on 12/2/19 at 11:41 am
This is always a fun series to watch. I also like the Gavitt Games with the Big East as well.
I added the Kenpom Ranking numbers to your list. It looks like many of the games, even the lesser ones, will be close and interesting.
Monday 12/2
KP#88 Miami @ KP#41 Illinois (7:00 pm)
KP#70 Clemson @ KP#77 Minnesota (9:00 pm)
Tuesday 12/3
KP#107 Northwestern @ KP#130 Boston College (7:00 pm)
KP#48 Iowa @ KP#54 Syracuse (7:00 pm)
KP#10 Michigan @ KP#2 Louisville (7:30 pm)
KP#15 Florida St @ KP#25 Indiana (9:00 pm)
KP#75 Pitt @ KP#71 Rutgers (9:00 pm)
KP#5 Duke @ KP#10 Michigan St (9:30 pm)
Wednesday 12/4
KP#143 Nebraska @ KP#72 Georgia Tech (7:15 pm)
KP#3 Virginia @ KP#13 Purdue (7:15 pm)
KP#52 Notre Dame @ KP#8 Maryland (7:30 pm)
KP#57 Wisconsin @ KP#44 NC State (9:15 pm)
KP#86 Wake Forest @ KP#24 Penn St (9:15 pm)
KP#4 Ohio State @ KP#12 North Carolina (9:15 pm)
I added the Kenpom Ranking numbers to your list. It looks like many of the games, even the lesser ones, will be close and interesting.
Monday 12/2
KP#88 Miami @ KP#41 Illinois (7:00 pm)
KP#70 Clemson @ KP#77 Minnesota (9:00 pm)
Tuesday 12/3
KP#107 Northwestern @ KP#130 Boston College (7:00 pm)
KP#48 Iowa @ KP#54 Syracuse (7:00 pm)
KP#10 Michigan @ KP#2 Louisville (7:30 pm)
KP#15 Florida St @ KP#25 Indiana (9:00 pm)
KP#75 Pitt @ KP#71 Rutgers (9:00 pm)
KP#5 Duke @ KP#10 Michigan St (9:30 pm)
Wednesday 12/4
KP#143 Nebraska @ KP#72 Georgia Tech (7:15 pm)
KP#3 Virginia @ KP#13 Purdue (7:15 pm)
KP#52 Notre Dame @ KP#8 Maryland (7:30 pm)
KP#57 Wisconsin @ KP#44 NC State (9:15 pm)
KP#86 Wake Forest @ KP#24 Penn St (9:15 pm)
KP#4 Ohio State @ KP#12 North Carolina (9:15 pm)
Popular