Favorite team:Wisconsin 
Location:Asheville, NC
Biography:40 y/o government contractor
Interests:Love to fish, target shoot, play golf and hang out with my wife & daughter
Occupation:Government Agent
Number of Posts:411
Registered on:10/3/2016
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

ec has better assistant coaches. We have higher salaries for them. That is what matters most anywa


Hilarious. That's why y'all are so butt hurt when Saban's assistants go on to completely suck as HC.
Demographics will hinder them, but their coaching talent will overcome.

Yeah demographics were supposed to hinder Republicans. That really hurt them huh?

re: Why WASHINGTON can beat Alabama

Posted by VOLLeyLLama on 12/5/16 at 10:09 am
quote:

Nobody in the country could possibly stop Brennan and the Rainbow Warriors offense.


Said nobody who ever had an ounce of knowledge about college football. Saying how that was basically a home game for Georgia and the strength of the SEC at that time, Hawaii didn't have a flipping prayer. Whoever bought into that shite was just falling for the media bullshite to try to hype up a game. The Dawgs were dominant, and I bet Georgia fans caught a shite load of grief over winning that game, but it wasn't y'alls fault that the shitty BCS system came up with that.

re: Why WASHINGTON can beat Alabama

Posted by VOLLeyLLama on 12/5/16 at 9:10 am
quote:

JustGetItRight


And if we use your reasoning, Ole Miss would destroy Washington. You can't be that fricking stupid to insinuate a team with 7 losses would compete against a team with one loss from another power 5. If we are talking early in the season, sure I get it, but not now.

re: Why WASHINGTON can beat Alabama

Posted by VOLLeyLLama on 12/5/16 at 6:53 am
quote:

OSU can't matchup against Clemson. Clemson is going to steamroll OSU and expose the committee's stupid selection here.


Yeah I think the committee was in a bad spot. I think the semifinal should have been reversed. OSU/Wash (Which OSU would probably roll) and Clemson/BAMA (which would be a great semifinal) should have been the matchups. But who knows what the hell they were thinking. The problem for Ohio State is their QB is one dimensional and can't throw the ball. That's why I was a little perplexed that the playoff committee decided on them. They are supposed to select the most complete teams and OSU is basically a one-dimensional offense. Look for a rematch of last year's championship. Maybe that was the committee's plan all along.

re: Why WASHINGTON can beat Alabama

Posted by VOLLeyLLama on 12/5/16 at 6:27 am
quote:

This is exactly right. It was painfully obvious that Alabama's defense was not built to defend spread HUNH teams at that time. H


Okay. So what? Now they are. That defense also had a hard time with the deep pass. Didn't prevent them from getting SEC championships. That was my point. Y'all are basically claiming that the SEC was declining at that time.

re: Why WASHINGTON can beat Alabama

Posted by VOLLeyLLama on 12/4/16 at 9:57 pm
Frac the world couldn't get laid in a house full of nymphos on ex.

re: Why WASHINGTON can beat Alabama

Posted by VOLLeyLLama on 12/4/16 at 9:56 pm
Agree to disagree. And don't call me a moron. I've been following college football since you were a twinkle in your mama's eyes, fricktard.
quote:

They were hosed by too many horrible calls.


Is this an LSU fan bitching about Ohio State-Michigan?? GTFO
quote:

Coker


Anybody see dat fool he owe me five dollars

re: Why WASHINGTON can beat Alabama

Posted by VOLLeyLLama on 12/4/16 at 9:39 pm
quote:

What are you smokin'?


Well he is up in Washington. Beautiful country, legalized weed and a decent football team that is going to be de-pants on National TV. 2 out of three ain't bad.
I want Botch gone. I don't want UT to keep winning these shite Bowl games. frick conference strength. We are shite conference this year. Bama holds all the power. SEC is just cowshit. And everything needs to go perfectly for all those games to hit right anyways. We need to get better head coaches in here or shite won't matter.

re: Why WASHINGTON can beat Alabama

Posted by VOLLeyLLama on 12/4/16 at 9:10 pm
quote:

4Ghost

Son, the better part of you hit the barstool after that fling. :rotflmao: :rotflmao:

re: Why WASHINGTON can beat Alabama

Posted by VOLLeyLLama on 12/4/16 at 9:05 pm
You don't get the point, little one. If Saban has had six+ years of #1 recruiting classes then you don't get to use that bull shite card with educated people who know their college football. Maybe for those particular classes they weren't up to snuff, but it's all relative. The next year, Bama had the same star studded recruits, but maybe they were of a higher caliber than the 5 stars from previous years. If you're going to say it, say it right.
Man there's so much homer shite from the OP, I don't know if he's high or should be in a fricking psych ward. No way Arky, UF, Tennessee and Auburn win. And I'm a Tennessee fan. :lol: :lol: :lol:

re: Why WASHINGTON can beat Alabama

Posted by VOLLeyLLama on 12/4/16 at 8:40 pm
quote:

2013 a Freshman Ashawn Robinson was the only impact next level defensive line Alabama that played. Trey Depriest was the worst starting MLB by far in the Saban era. That team has zero pass rush and the worst front 7 of the Saban era by far. The secondary had the worst CBs of the Saban era by far as well.


So you are basically saying that the SEC was donkey shite back then as well. Bama only lost one regular season game, the IB. But yet they had the worst defense of any point in the Saban era. I thinks you be speaking out your arse.

re: Why WASHINGTON can beat Alabama

Posted by VOLLeyLLama on 12/4/16 at 7:59 pm
quote:

Your team is garbage...


Come on bro. shite talking a team that literally has zero chance of winning. Do you also steal from the Salvation Army red Christmas kettles?

re: Why WASHINGTON can beat Alabama

Posted by VOLLeyLLama on 12/4/16 at 7:44 pm
I think Boomer has a solid point though. That has typically been Bama's kryptonite in the past. But then again, the SEC would have already given Bama one loss by now. That hasn't happened yet, and it doesn't look like it will until maybe next year.
Yeah I think the old BCS system would have had the title game as the rematch of last year's game. Buckeyes and UW to the Rose Bowl.