Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:70
Registered on:9/29/2015
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Michigan
Michigan
Michgan
MichigN

HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF BUT EVERYONE IS BLIND TO IT.

Harbaugh is God.

Saban can't carry his jock. Harbaugh almost won two Super Bowls, SABAN almost won getting re-hired by the Dolphins.

Saban is fricked.

Meyer + Harbaugh in college.

Saban only won once Peter Caroll left. USC owned Alabama, tOSU owned Bama, Florida owned Bama...

Saban can't win when good cfb coaches abound. He needs Les Miles and nothing else.
There is a reason why the SEC can't call themselves the Conference of Champions.

But the PAC-12 can.

It's a copyright and the NCAA SACTIONS IT.

THE NCAA HAS ALLOWED THE PAC-12 TO COPYRIGHT THE CONFERENCE OF CHAMPIONS BECAUSE THEY ARE THE CONFERENCE OF CHAMPIONS.

Otherwise they would get sued.

Why hasn't the SEC sued the Pac-12?

Because they can't claim falsehood.

Why can'g we be honest? Why muat you lie "CHeese dick loser SEC dick rider"

I tell all SEC dick riders, grow up... lets move on. Stop lying.

We ruled from 2008-2012 but before that we sucked.

re: Clemson - Notre Dame Thoughts?

Posted by SECfirst on 10/1/15 at 12:41 am
YEAH. YOU RIGHT.

CLEMSON WOULD BE +7.

(But I heard from Vegas dudes that ND and USC get the most public money thrown at them - so usually they have to give the other team a lot of points - ergo Stanford getting 41 points years ago...a conference opponent getting 41 points is unheard of - no matter how bad people think they are - Stanford wasn't Appy State.)

So people love ND and USC nationally and usually the opponent gets the points.
So you RA' because someone doesn't tow the party line?

You don't like the message so you go crying to RA'?

Amazing.

People told me the SEC Rant was a cult that didn't like truth...and now I know.

I'll stick to the MSB - where people can speak honestly and not cry to their Momma when they hear things they don't like.

How do you live in total denial as a person?

I don't get it.

I posted pure facts. No trolling. It's posted on the NCAA web. (Unless you count Bama's 5 bullshite titles - I don't AND MOST DON'T.)

AND WIKI CONFIRMS THIS - AND NCAA WEBSITE

PAC-12 MOST NATIONAL TITLES IN ALL SPORTS


PAC-12 - MOST BASKETBALL
PQC-12 - MOST BASEBALL
PAC-12 - MOST FOOTBALL (USC HAS 11 - DESPITE THE NCAA)


TENNIS, SWIMMING, TRACK AND FIELD (FASTEST ATHLETES) - ETC.

BUT RA, BECAUSE THE CULT DOESN'T LIKE HEARING TRUTH.

AMAZING...YOU CAN'T TALK AND SPEAK ON A WEBSITE UNLESS YOU BUY INTO THE PARTY LINE BULLSHITE.

re: Clemson - Notre Dame Thoughts?

Posted by SECfirst on 10/1/15 at 12:22 am
Clemson is a total unknown after playing nobody.

Vegas having this game as a pick-em is sort of weird considering the ND following. You would think so much money would be on ND and they would have Clemson -7 at least.

Clemson barely beating shitty-arse UL is worrisome.

I would be shocked if ND doesn't win by 2 Tds.
quote:


PAC owned NCAA basketball in the early days, SEC owns the modern era
PAC owned NCAA basetball in the early days, SEC owns the modern era


What does this even mean?

What is your definition of modern era?

And who cares about modern era as if it means anything.

National titles are national titles...and the Pac-12 owns all 3 sports.

And Oregon State won twice recently...and USC won in the 90's...and Stanford was a mainstay in the 80's. In fact, the Pac-12 had the most representatives in the CWS in the 80's and 90's and 2000's combined.

Including football. Look it up! Why are you being a total troll. It's on wikipedia idiot.

You are the biggest troll for lying constantly on this website...and then you call others trolls for not agreeing with your lies. Sorry for the truth but speaking the truth isn't a troll bud.

Most football national titles - Pac-12
Most baseball national titles - Pac-12
Most basketball national titles - Pac-12


Those are cold hard facts.

Trolling is speaking fabricated lies to spark a response...it seems to you, trolling is speaking truth you don't agree with.

"It's a conference, not a cult."
I know it is blasphemy, but Faulk was the better of the two I saw in person.

In just his second collegiate game. In 37 carries, he amassed 386 yards and scored seven touchdowns, both records for freshmen (the 386 yards were a then-NCAA record).


And then as a sophmore, I saw Faulk Faulk rush 27 times for 220 yards and 3 touchdowns for the lowly Aztecs. Almost single-handidly beating USC.

Biggest Heisman snub.

Faulk was facing a much bigger battle then just Torretta. He also up against overtly bias Southern media and their love affair with all things SEC. Georgia running back Garrison Hearst had a solid year for the Bulldogs in 1992 and he came in third overall in the voting with 982 points. Thanks to SEC writers who don't think college football is played anywhere north of the Mason-Dixon line and west of the Mississippi river, Hearst won the South region with 252 points. He was third in every other region that year. If they would have been willing to recognize the better running back it would have helped Faulk immensely.

Meanwhile Faulk was a one man show for the Aztecs. Teams knew all they had to was stop him and they would easily win. However they couldn't shut him down. Faulk ran for 1,630 yards and 15 touchdowns in just 10 games that year for the Aztecs. He led the nation in rushing for the second straight year. Unfortunately SDSU had no defense and they allowed 30.7 points per game. The Aztecs tied USC 31-31 in the season opener, beat #25 BYU and then lost to #11 UCLA to start the year. They lost three close conference games to Air Force, Wyoming and Fresno State. The Bulldogs had a solid QB in Trent Dilfer.
Rammer Jammer is one of the best CFB books of all-time.

Not even a Tide fan but loved it.

Not even a Notre Dame fan but loved Rudy.

Same thing.

You can like things that celebrate CFB even if you dislike the topic.
quote:

Cheese Grits


You are a liar.

Google is your friend.

Pac-12 has the most titles in baseball, basketball and football.

Look it up bro.

I'm tired of you being obtuse with your phony record postings.

It's on Google...and Wiki.

Pac-12 owns all 3 major sports. This is a fact so stop trying to debate with your lies.

How pathetic that you can't even Google and Wiki.
Bama is getting a lot of non-love.

And a lot of that is Kiffin. Media knows Kiffin (he is a cancer) - but I wouldn't want to play Bama or USC or Utah or tOSU.

I wouldn't care about playing Michigan State or TCU or Baylor or Oregon, etc.

In fact, I'd rather play Michigan State than Michigan.

But tOSU, Utah, USC and Bama scare me. Bama because of Saban, USC in spite of Sark. USC is just that talented while Bama has the coach.
quote:

Michigan


Smart answer.

They are going to playoffs.

Utah is as well.
Barry Sanders
Marshall Faulk
Adrian Peterson
Reggie Bush

and LF7

Are the best I've ever seen in my lifetime.

And in that order.
Is USC 2003, 2004, 2005...and Oregon State 2006, 2007 and UCLA 1995 and Arizona 1997..."modern history."
Is USC 2003, 2004, 2005...and Oregon State 2006, 2007 and UCLA 1995 and Arizona 1997..."modern history."
You're dumb.

Google is your friend.

What does this even mean "modern history shows" - we're talking about all history.

USC has more national titles in baseball than the entire SEC.

USC has more national titles in football than the entire SEC.

UCLA has more national titles in the basketball than the entire SEC.
Nope

You are an idiot or a liar.

Pac-12 has most baseball, basketball and football national titles.

15 in basketball - most
17 in baseball - most
17 in football - most (11 by USC, 3 by Cal, 1 by Stanford, 1 by UCLA, 1 by Colorado.)

It's not the often refrain of the Pac-12 plays Olympic sports more.

Pac-12 owns also the Big 3 sports. That's a fact...google is your friend.
If I was on my lawn, it would still be the 1970's.

Only old men like shite from the 1970's like the Superdome.

Get off your antiquated dilapidated lawn...and move on with modern society.

Is Pele going to play in the Dome?

Are you a fan of the New York Cosmos?

It's 2015, no reason to have crap like the rug and carpet that is the Superdome.
Bama is still strong.

They look somewhat pathetic on offense with Kiffin and aren't feared like year's past...but the D is still there and there are only 5 teams I'd not want to play over Bama.

tOSU
Michigan State
Utah
Ole Miss
USC

Bama
I'm a huge Raider fan...

Back to going to the LA Coliseum for games.

It was all gangs and thugs and terrible and half empty - I was a college student...and while the USC games were great like when they played Notre Dame, the Raider games were awful.

And Oakland has the most goddamn worst stadium in the history of the world.

Piss backed up at a game and the old cement concourse was a piss bucket...and more gangs and lowlifes.

I love the Raiders but we've never had a good stadium...and the experience is like the early 80's still to this day.

Every stadium has upgraded and the Raiders are stuck in the late 70's early 80's.