Vacherie Saint

It’s all good. I’m not telling the forum anything they don’t already know.

why wouldnt he lie about it? The media will not challenge him on the issue further.

Roger is gooning to this image as we speak.

quote:

---

Did you read anything that would cause the military to disobey orders like democrats claimed?

---

You are making my point. You see... you can choose to ignore all context, history, character, and implication to make the more literal, logic-based argument defending these democrats with complete utility. You and your wingnut friend SFP did that well yesterday.
The probelm for you is, the foundation from which you made that argument collapses from under your feet the second you deny that same logical and literal license to Trump. Then your defense of democrats melts into partisan bitching masquerading as a logical argument.

Having your cake and eating it too is a privilege reserved for elite democrats. Real conservatives like you have to be consistent.

I love this logic.

Dems were simply “reminding” veterans of what the law says about disobedience. But Trump, who similarly reminded these Dems of the penalties of sedition, was clearly threatening to kill people.

It’s stories like these that get the esteemed board “centrists” telling on themselves.

Hes an idiot.
He cant shut tf up about how Trump commited an insurrection by calling for peaceful protests at the capital. He repeats this charge to this very day.
But when he goes online and tells the military and IC that the president is pitting them against the American people and is a threat to the constitution, and they do not have to obey his orders if they deem them "unlawful" - we are supposed to take it because "muh ackshywully"? frick that.

The libs, SFP, Roger, and all the rest will run here like love-scorned, preteen girls to blast Trump everytime he draws a breath - but this rube is held as one of the democrat stars. The double standards are embarassing.

easy. it depends on who gets to interpret the legality of the order in real time. this isnt hard.

If a soldier follows the commands of the CiC, who (with the assistance of WH legal counsel, the DoJ, and the DoW) believe the command to be lawful - even citing the legal basis for the order (as they have done several times) - can said soldier defy those orders if he or she "feels" its illegal? Should the soldier on the battle field refuse the command until the injunctions drop? We see this every day with Trump. shite, you spend all of your days and nights on here arguing that everything he does is illegal. Virtually every action gets challenged by a federal judge somewhere regardless of what it is, so what exactly are these dems asking soldiers in the field to do?

Essentially they are asking the military to NOT presume their commanders' orders are lawful in real time. Thats insane in the current lawfare climate. Forget about Trump's reponse. That's fricking insane and they need to stfu before a bunch of bleeding heart idiots in the military get hammered on UCMJ violations.

Its really not complicated. What do you think happens when you eliminate the trades from high school and put able bodied young men on welfare? What happens when you let them linger on their parents health insurance until they are nearly 30? Expand already existing programs like TOPS Tech to expand tech college opportunities, bring back trade programs in school, and let the market take care of itself.

quote:

---

Drive trucks
Run Dunk’n Donuts franchises
Run liquor stores

---

quote:

---

Well that's why the admin is pushing a ruse that H1B isn't being used for those jobs

---

hurr durr

Most H1B visa holders work in tech. over 64%