Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:35
Registered on:7/14/2015
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I would say they should go with "Landsharks" just because it's badass, but as you said, we live in rediculously PC times. They probably couldn't get away with it because it would offend ocean dwelling sharks.
All of those help, but the cultural reason why the SEC is so strong is that first, many states in the south don't have a professional sports outlet so college football takes it's place. The second reason won't make people happy to hear, but it's true. Most schools in the SEC are decently easy to gain admission to, so there are proportionately many more people that have a connection to these universities either because they attended, or have immediate friends/family that attended. I'm not calling southerners dumb, I'm just saying that compared to say the Pac-12, where 4 of the 5 consistently best football schools are consistently ranked in the top 30 academic rankings/ have brutally low acceptance rates that shut out your average person. That isn't the case in the SEC.

Bama coaching hire.

Posted by Rant4days on 7/24/15 at 8:27 am
When Nick Saban hangs it up to do TV/retirement in a few, would Bama fans be all in with support for a guy like Gary Patterson, who hasn't won a Ring, but is universally known as one of the best in CFB?

Vanderbilt vs. Stanford

Posted by Rant4days on 7/24/15 at 6:56 am
Not criticizing Vandy, just wondering what keeps them from capitalizing on Stanfords model of success. Recruiting highly intelligent athletes who also have a lot of talent. Stanford makes a living on fast, smart, and disciplined white boys to put a decent team together every year. California does it in the fertile California recruiting territory, why can't Vandy do the same in the even more talent rich southeast. Hard to believe there's not a bunch of really smart disciplined kids who would buy into that model, and would love to spend their college years playing football in Nashville while also getting a top notch education. Notre Dame does the same in the Mid-West to a lesser extent.

re: Perfect Ole Miss player.

Posted by Rant4days on 7/21/15 at 4:19 pm
quote:

He "creates havoc" though.


Breaking: Arkansas just now rushed for another 8 yards straight through his gap.

Perfect Ole Miss player.

Posted by Rant4days on 7/21/15 at 4:10 pm
I can't think of a more perfect player for Ole Miss to have as the face of their team than Robert Nkemdiche. The parallels are just too perfect.
1. Way over hyped.
2. Has flashes of good, but at the end of the year the numbers say they're only slightly above average.
3. Constant excuse making for why the production isn't what it could be.
4. Way over hyped.
5. Stops trying and fades away when things get tough.
6. You forget about them both until you actually play them, chances are they won't consistently beat you, and you have to laugh through a broadcast full of empty ESPN hype.
7. Did I mention way over hyped?

Why Saban should hate the CFP

Posted by Rant4days on 7/21/15 at 4:02 pm
The same reason why he couldn't make it in the NFL, when he plays against a team with a similar talent level, or a good enough team on the road, he usually loses. When CNS can't just out recruit/out talent teams, he's a very average coach, and that's why he should hate the new CFP format, as opposed to the old BCS that just gave him free rides .
Let's look at his national championships at Bama:
2009: Beat a Texas team without their starting quarterback.
2011: Big win, but shouldn't have even been there after losing to LSU AT HOME(queue calls for end of the BCS)
2012: Beat the hell out of a Notre Dame team the whole country knew was laughably over rated.

In comes the CFP, now he has to play his way in to championship games instead of it just being given to him by the BCS because he has the letter A in cursive on his chest. At that level, teams all have top notch talent/coaches, and what Ohio State did to them this last year is just a taste.

He's a good coach, and a superb recruiter, but he's not a god. This season, with their schedule, is about to expose him, because his team won't be vastly more talented than many of his opponents.

re: Taking care of players

Posted by Rant4days on 7/20/15 at 3:18 pm
quote:

Where would all of the money come from.


This is my case for SEC Autonomy away from the NCAA, SEC Network revenue in addition to current revenue sharing via merchandising and ticket sales should suffice.

re: Taking care of players

Posted by Rant4days on 7/20/15 at 3:14 pm
quote:

Why should a school provide extended benefits after they have graduated?


Because College athletics is a business, and what is demanded of Athletes is more grueling both physically and schedule wise than a normal student. If you attend Bama as a student, the exchange between the two parties is education for money via tuition/fees. In the case of Athletes, they are providing a service to the University in exchange for education rather than exchanging money, but because athletes are asked to not only fulfill obligations on the academic end, but also be representatives outside of the classroom, and are also asked to potentially sustain long term PHYSICAL injuries on behalf of the University, (something that is not required by ordinary students), they should be compensated via benefits in the same way a chancellor, who serves as a spokesman, or a landscaper who may be injured on the job is compensated beyond their employment if they can no longer work. The NCAA has a narrative that athletes should be the same as normal students, but the reality is, what they contribute to the University via revenue, time, and public relations is beyond what a normal student is asked to do, in my option, they are not equal.

re: Taking care of players

Posted by Rant4days on 7/20/15 at 2:30 pm
quote:

Scholarships are honored.


Not in all cases, though I will admit individual schools are getting better about it.

re: Taking care of players

Posted by Rant4days on 7/20/15 at 2:29 pm
Maybe I'm making the case of Autonomy, but I think there should be a conference wide fund to provide players healthcare for the extended future beyond when they're on the roster. Especially later in life if they sustain head/joint injuries.

re: Taking care of players

Posted by Rant4days on 7/20/15 at 2:26 pm
quote:

This already happens.


Yes, but we should do more.

Taking care of players

Posted by Rant4days on 7/20/15 at 2:23 pm
I wanted to get yalls opinions on this, because I don't believe players should be paid, but I think these guys should be taken care of health wise for the injuries they sustain playing for our schools, and schools should create a separate scholarship fund to allow players with career ending injuries to still finish up their education without affecting the 85 scholarship count. Part of why CFB is so great is that it offers kids who come from nothing to achieve the American Dream even if they aren't a 5- star NFL talent. As a conference we can/should do more. Please share your thoughts.

re: Best traveling fanbases in the SEC

Posted by Rant4days on 7/20/15 at 1:49 pm
Penn State has always, and will always be the biggest. Huge school, rabid fanbase. Michigan is up there as well just because it's a massive school with elite academics, so you have wealthy alumni all around the country. Most SEC schools are smaller and more regional. I'm just talking about national travel. Obviously within the SEC it's probably LSU. Most Bama fans who come to away games are the trailer trash who can't afford tickets at BDS.
Dude statistically speaking it's rare that even 5 star QB's live up to the hype. He could just as easily be a bust. I remember people calling Garrett Gilbert the next Peyton Manning, ask Mack Brown how that went.
Golson is a loss, but Ole Miss fans always way over hyped how good Prewitt was. He was very instinctual, good tackler, and great in run support, but the dude was also desperately slow, and used to get carved at will by teams in pass coverage. There's a reason he was a 2x all American who went undrafted.
The entire offensive line is returning, their receivers should compete with A&M for best in the conference between Treadwell, Stringfellow, and Core. Engram is best TE in conference. Ole Miss could be a scary team if they don't have too many Injuries on their O-Line and the QB play isn't crap. Both are big question marks though.
Honestly, probably even better than last year. Their only question is at linebacker, but they run a nickel defense so they don't really use linebackers in a conventional way, and they have talented but unproven guys. Defensive line is probably best in the conference, secondary is top 3. Ole Miss' questions are almost exclusively on offense.

re: Blind SEC Pride

Posted by Rant4days on 7/19/15 at 11:56 am
Don't think that's fair, UGA is a good school, but do you really think building a football powerhouse wouldn't make the school even better? The growth may not be as dramatic, but rankings will be climbed without a doubt.

re: Blind SEC Pride

Posted by Rant4days on 7/19/15 at 11:50 am
Over the past 8 years, Bama has raised their median ACT scores, brought in massive amounts of money to improve academic programs, and funded tenure-ship for much better professors all on the back of the winning football program. mostly by appealing to out of state students. Bama is the blueprint.