Cracking
| Favorite team: | New Orleans Saints |
| Location: | Northshore |
| Biography: | WHO DAT? |
| Interests: | Sports |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 3511 |
| Registered on: | 8/18/2006 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: BYU Fans are way better than LSU Fans
Posted by Cracking on 11/16/25 at 4:44 am to lsufan0582
quote:
Cougardroppings
:pimp:
quote:
Y'all suck in every metric.
Well, except on-field success both recent (SEC championship appearance in 2019 and 2022 and National Championship in 2019 with the best collegiate offense ever assembled) and the program's historic success.
And, well, potential future success. A uniquely fertile recruiting base with no other P4 schools within a 250 mile radius as well as some of the best facilities, NIL and fan support for success in the Country. 5 of the best NFL receivers were born within 75 miles of Baton Rouge, and that type of skilled talent isn't going away.
quote:
Are they solvent? (you're not)
This is a farse. LSU could pay Kelly's buyout and hire the highest paid coach and still support facility renovation and a competitive NIL without much issue if they need to. Just because LSU's fired AD gave a terrible contract to Brian Kelly and the admin is negotiating with Kelly's hostile legal team who's spreading slander to leverage the university doesn't mean LSU is broke.
quote:
Who is the AD I will be working for?
Verge Ausberry, a football guy who's fully committed and will support the football team as the bell cow of the University. You can talk all the shite you want about him, but I assure you he's fully committed to LSU football and whoever is the new coach.
quote:
Will I have to tolerate meddlers?
This is LSU's biggest problem RIGHT NOW because of a high profile dumb arse in the governor's mansion, but it will all be over once they hire a coach. This hasn't always been the problem. Saban, Miles, Orgeron, and Kelly were not meddled with, but this was a unique time when LSU was without a president and the head coach was fired midseason making the meddling seem like more than it really is. Any time a politician (especially a republican LA governor who fits every national stereotype) gets involved 50% of people and all of the media will create overblown controversy.
Trust that LSU football will succeed sooner than Utenn. Even coming out of this mistake of hiring Brian Kelly and the drama that ensued, they are a better football program. Remember that LSU beat the shite out of everyone with Ed F'ing Orgeron as HC.
If Heupel or most every other HC in the country were honest, they would look at all of the advantages that LSU has including the likely current and future athletes playing at LSU, and beg LSU to hire them. In this day and age of college football, NIL money is King, but the other recruiting advantages that have always existed remain. Proximity and appearance are huge! What university in the country can show more national athletic representation than LSU? The reputation that has almost every ESPN show and social media platform full of LSU athletes.
If LSU finds and hires the right coach, everyone knows what is going to happen rather quickly.
The article is using innuendo regarding the whole "for cause" thing drummed up by Kelly's team to force a bigger buyout. Kelly's legal team are the only people saying anything regarding "for cause" or LSU isn't admitting they fired him or LSU is trying to get out of paying him!
LSU has NEVER publicly said they aren't paying Kelly his buyout or that they are firing him for cause. This is an accusation by Kelly's legal team. They are using the media to leverage LSU to force a higher lump sum buyout vs accepting a monthly payment (or the lump sum LSU offered already).
Anyone who believes this shite would get steam rolled in business and high leverage situations because they care too much about the controversy and slander that the media vomits for the lemmings to gobble everyday.
Bottom line is that Kelly wants a lump sum vs monthly payments so he can go get another coaching or media job and "double dip" without losing some of his LSU settlement/buyout money. LSU offered $30-33M and Kelly's team countered with an outrageous amount of $43M lump sum and filed a suit to put media and public pressure on LSU to settle.
If they settle for a reasonable amount both sides walk away better in the long run, but Kelly seems to be demanding too much which is forcing LSU to delay and of course allowing the piglets sucking on the media tit to squeal into more catastrophe syndrome.
OMG HOW IS LSU EVER GOING TO RECOVER?!?!?!
LSU has NEVER publicly said they aren't paying Kelly his buyout or that they are firing him for cause. This is an accusation by Kelly's legal team. They are using the media to leverage LSU to force a higher lump sum buyout vs accepting a monthly payment (or the lump sum LSU offered already).
Anyone who believes this shite would get steam rolled in business and high leverage situations because they care too much about the controversy and slander that the media vomits for the lemmings to gobble everyday.
Bottom line is that Kelly wants a lump sum vs monthly payments so he can go get another coaching or media job and "double dip" without losing some of his LSU settlement/buyout money. LSU offered $30-33M and Kelly's team countered with an outrageous amount of $43M lump sum and filed a suit to put media and public pressure on LSU to settle.
If they settle for a reasonable amount both sides walk away better in the long run, but Kelly seems to be demanding too much which is forcing LSU to delay and of course allowing the piglets sucking on the media tit to squeal into more catastrophe syndrome.
OMG HOW IS LSU EVER GOING TO RECOVER?!?!?!
re: Kenny Dillingham's recruiting
Posted by Cracking on 11/7/25 at 12:27 pm to GetmorewithLes
quote:
Dillingham met with his players in position groups yesterday or day before and committed to them that he will be their coach in 2026…
Article was on On3 yesterday
Wikipedia:
Personal life
Dillingham and his wife, Briana, have one child.
He has wanted to coach Arizona State since he was young as it is his hometown team.[16]
If this is true, it would likely require a large sum of money to lure him from Arizona State, but I would love for LSU to make a run at hiring him.
quote:
Fritz (Houston).
Proven successful program/culture guy!
I think he'd be a good hire.
The demand on him to show immediate results would be tough from the fan perspective. I'm not sure he would be a great fit because of the short leash he would be given.
quote:
0 chance he leaves
Even for LSU? Does he see himself winning a championship at TT? Sure, winning the big 12 is doable every year, but competing against A&M (or UT some years) in the playoffs let alone Bama or Ohio State! Does he care about in-state legend status or his ability to win a championship?
He'd improve recruiting in Texas, and LSU recruits itself in Louisiana. NIL is obviously the wave of recruiting, but relationships still matter.
I just don't know if he's the right fit at LSU, but wouldn't be opposed to it if he would leave for the chance at a championship at a championship level program. That is all with the understanding that deducted coaches and tier 1 coaches fall through.
quote:
Oh, I think we know...
:lol:
quote:
Any list that has McGuire on it go ahead and click off
Tells me you have 0 understanding of the coaching landscape
Why is that? He's a good coach at a decent program. Is it because he wouldn't leave TT for LSU? Or because he's not yet proven enough to be LSU's HC?
You gotta take into consideration that the list/ranking at the bottom is after the deducted list and tier 1.
re: Logical deduction for coach search (Long)
Posted by Cracking on 11/5/25 at 12:19 pm to tigerbaiter1033
quote:
Thank god you are not in charge of the coaching search
:lol:
You never know.
You gotta take into consideration the deductions prior to the rankings at the bottom. Obviously all LSU fans want a coach from the deducted list or from tier 1. I'm just listing/ranking what's left.
re: Logical deduction for coach search (Long)
Posted by Cracking on 11/5/25 at 12:17 pm to Sleepy_Tiger
quote:
IM good with a 2nd or 3rd tier coach but you lost me with Manny Diaz
I get it, but I'm a fan of Diaz. He may be the best defensive mind in CFB. He wasn't terrible at UM as his first HC job. He has Duke competitive in the ACC with less talent.
I want LSU to get back to playing high level defense. Find an OC that has a history of success, and pair him with Diaz! Everyone is so hung up on offensive minded coaches.
quote:
Arand
:lol:
He's like the 8th option after tier 1 and my rankings of tier 2 and 3.
He's an intelligent football coach with a history at LSU.
Logical deduction for coach search (Long)
Posted by Cracking on 11/5/25 at 11:44 am
Remove unrealistic candidates or candidates who are too old/retired, remove coaches having success at a blue blood program, remove coaches making good money at their alma mater, and coaches with HUGE buyouts or coaching for universities with deeper pockets that will counter LSU:
This removes Day, DeBoer, Freeman, Elko, Saban, Meyer, Cignetti, Dillingham, Brohm, Key, Cristobal, Lanning, Riley, and Lea.
LSU could pull off a heist and nab one, but the likelihood of another Brian Kelly type hire is questionable. The only realistic candidates on that list IMO are Dillingham, Brohm, Key and Lea all who would be good hires, but let's remove them as part of the logical deduction because they are coaching at their Alma Mater.
Coaches left who are having moderate or better success listed by 1st tier (coaches at good programs ranked top 25), then 2nd tier (coaches in top 25 at mid programs), and 3rd tier (coaches from unranked mid or decent programs having some success):
1st tier - Kiffin(UM), Drinkwitz(Mizzou), and Heupel(Tenn) - all pricey to pull from competing SEC schools.
2nd tier - Sitake(BYU), McGuire(Texas Tech but may be too expensive for a question mark hire), Tony Elliot (UVA), Silverfield(Memphis), Fisch(UW), and Satterfield(Cincy).
3rd tier - Sumral(Tulane), Golesh(USF), Morris(UNT), Lashlee(SMU), Fritz(Houston), Aranda(Baylor), Fleck(Minnesota) Diaz(Duke), Dykes(TCU), Huff(USM), Harrell(ECU), and Rhule(Nebraska).
If LSU can't pull one of the tier 1 options, would you be happy (or at least satisfied) with any from tier 2 or 3?
I think of tier 2 and 3 coaches I would rank them:
1. McGuire
2. Diaz (For some reason I think he will be great at the right place)
3. Sitake, Fisch or Aranda
4. Fleck or Rhule
5. Elliot
6. All the rest from the mid G4 programs or not in the G4
After Tier 1, I hope LSU considers McGuire if possible or Manny Diaz!
This removes Day, DeBoer, Freeman, Elko, Saban, Meyer, Cignetti, Dillingham, Brohm, Key, Cristobal, Lanning, Riley, and Lea.
LSU could pull off a heist and nab one, but the likelihood of another Brian Kelly type hire is questionable. The only realistic candidates on that list IMO are Dillingham, Brohm, Key and Lea all who would be good hires, but let's remove them as part of the logical deduction because they are coaching at their Alma Mater.
Coaches left who are having moderate or better success listed by 1st tier (coaches at good programs ranked top 25), then 2nd tier (coaches in top 25 at mid programs), and 3rd tier (coaches from unranked mid or decent programs having some success):
1st tier - Kiffin(UM), Drinkwitz(Mizzou), and Heupel(Tenn) - all pricey to pull from competing SEC schools.
2nd tier - Sitake(BYU), McGuire(Texas Tech but may be too expensive for a question mark hire), Tony Elliot (UVA), Silverfield(Memphis), Fisch(UW), and Satterfield(Cincy).
3rd tier - Sumral(Tulane), Golesh(USF), Morris(UNT), Lashlee(SMU), Fritz(Houston), Aranda(Baylor), Fleck(Minnesota) Diaz(Duke), Dykes(TCU), Huff(USM), Harrell(ECU), and Rhule(Nebraska).
If LSU can't pull one of the tier 1 options, would you be happy (or at least satisfied) with any from tier 2 or 3?
I think of tier 2 and 3 coaches I would rank them:
1. McGuire
2. Diaz (For some reason I think he will be great at the right place)
3. Sitake, Fisch or Aranda
4. Fleck or Rhule
5. Elliot
6. All the rest from the mid G4 programs or not in the G4
After Tier 1, I hope LSU considers McGuire if possible or Manny Diaz!
quote:
1. Joey McGuire (Texas Tech HC)
Forget what everyone else is saying! Arkansas should make him say no. He'd be the best fit.
quote:
1. James Franklin (fired from PSU)
I think this is also a great fit! Franklin has SEC roots and was consistently competitive in the SEC and Big 10 until this year following a departure of a lot of NFL talent. He just couldn't get over the Ohio State hurdle which seems to be a problem for everyone not named Harbaugh/Michigan. NO ONE will say Cignetti is a bad coach if Indiana loses bad to Ohio State this year again.
Everyone else would be question mark hire in my opinion, but someone could answer that question with good to great results if given the opportunity. Someone who has the fire and intelligence to succeed at Arkansas. Sumrall might be that guy, but he still hasn't done enough to show he's ready for an SEC school IMO.
re: Make your prediction for the head coach. Volume 2. I'll keep a tally.
Posted by Cracking on 11/4/25 at 7:51 am to SmackDaniels
Curt Cignetti
He's the perfect fit for LSU at this moment if LSU can afford to pull him from Indiana!
He's the perfect fit for LSU at this moment if LSU can afford to pull him from Indiana!
quote:
zero big names.
I'm so sick of the insecurity of some LSU fans. The whole "big name," whale-type hire has been horrible for LSU. The guys who have been good hires over the first quarter of the 21st century were not the "big name" guys.
People would argue that Saban was a big name, but he really had average results at Michigan State with some big wins each year. Obviously a solid coach, but not setting the world on fire at Michigan State.
Les Miles was not a big name, but a solid coach with a stubborn approach like BK but at least he was likable with amusing rants instead of constant temper tantrums and resting bitch face.
Ed Orgeron was laughed at until 2019 and then was laughed at after 2019.
BK was the big fish hire and may be the worst of all 4 coaches (Ed Orgeron would be a close second, but he had some better intangibles than BK).
LSU needs to just find the best coach available even if it's a coach from a G5 conference. LSU needs a hard working coach with a solid approach to running a program, tough and disciplined football team and a growth/learning mindset!
:geauxtigers:
re: Guys, I’m officially on the Sumrall train
Posted by Cracking on 10/27/25 at 12:48 pm to BootyFett69
+1
I like Sumrall. He's young, but confident with a good sense of humor. He's not a dickhead like Brian Kelly! His teams play tough and he has recruited well at Tulane!
He has likely already developed in-state ties/relationships with HS coaches and NIL managers while at Tulane.
He has SEC ties as well.
Other than his only head coaching experience being mid-major programs, I think he has a TON of potential.
If successful, he's young enough to coach at LSU for a long time and potentially build a dynasty type program.
He would also be very affordable compared to Kiffin or some other power 5 coach.
I like Sumrall. He's young, but confident with a good sense of humor. He's not a dickhead like Brian Kelly! His teams play tough and he has recruited well at Tulane!
He has likely already developed in-state ties/relationships with HS coaches and NIL managers while at Tulane.
He has SEC ties as well.
Other than his only head coaching experience being mid-major programs, I think he has a TON of potential.
If successful, he's young enough to coach at LSU for a long time and potentially build a dynasty type program.
He would also be very affordable compared to Kiffin or some other power 5 coach.
I would be satisfied with anyone on both of those lists.
I really like both Chadwell and Sumrall though. Young, smart and confident guys who, if successful, could lead LSU for a long time!
Sumrall is recruiting well at Tulane and his on field success is obvious. His teams play hard and he has SEC experience/ties. I think he's the perfect fit for the Tigers at this time, but unfortunately the fans and admin will look at him as just another mid-major guy.
Golesh and Dillingham are interesting options too.
I really like both Chadwell and Sumrall though. Young, smart and confident guys who, if successful, could lead LSU for a long time!
Sumrall is recruiting well at Tulane and his on field success is obvious. His teams play hard and he has SEC experience/ties. I think he's the perfect fit for the Tigers at this time, but unfortunately the fans and admin will look at him as just another mid-major guy.
Golesh and Dillingham are interesting options too.
re: In the unlikely event that BK is fired, who are some possible coaching cand.? I’ll start….
Posted by Cracking on 10/20/25 at 12:06 pm to Returnofzeus
quote:
Elliott is 17-24 at uva ??
Yeah, definitely a learning curve taking the job at a lower/middle of the pack program for the ACC as his first HC gig, but he's seemingly on an upward trajectory now. The record would definitely disqualify him from a job like LSU. I just think he's a good coach and seems like a good guy despite his overall record.
Coaches who overachieve with traditionally middle of the pack teams or even cellar dwellers.
1. Google me Kurt Cignetti, but he just got PAID.
2. Tony Elliot at UVA is doing well also, and he seems like a great person and very good coach.
3. I like Brent Key at Georgia Tech too, but he's a GT guy. His teams play downhill with toughness and compete hard.
1. Google me Kurt Cignetti, but he just got PAID.
2. Tony Elliot at UVA is doing well also, and he seems like a great person and very good coach.
3. I like Brent Key at Georgia Tech too, but he's a GT guy. His teams play downhill with toughness and compete hard.
How about just get under center with a heavy formation with an overloaded side of the line and run the damn ball through somebody's face mask. How is LSU getting pushed around by Vandy?!?!
Popular
0












