
DawgsOnTopOfYou
Favorite team: | Georgia ![]() |
Location: | Athens |
Biography: | |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 38 |
Registered on: | 11/25/2013 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: I bought too many Rose Bowl tix...
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 12/7/17 at 10:28 am
I bought mine in 9H and got them yesterday. I wasn't sure if this was the UGA section or not and not finding many reliable reports. Hopefully the entire stadium is the UGA section.
Alcohol Sales at SECCG
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 11/30/17 at 9:45 am
Does anyone know if there will be alcohol sold at the game? I know they didn't in 2011/12 but was hoping this had changed since then or with the move to Mercedes-Benz. Or is it an SEC rule stopping sales?
re: About The Fans
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 9/10/17 at 2:23 am
I was there. That stadium was rocking. Best away game 8've ever been to. And props to the ND fans. Great hosts.
re: Georgia at Notre Dame
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 9/10/17 at 2:16 am
UGA plays at Mizzou every two years. That's our trip north.
re: Season tickets came today
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 8/4/17 at 2:41 pm
Did you just get them yesterday? Haven't gotten mine yet and I'm trying to decide how long I need to wait before I call up UGA to make sure they got sent to the right place.
re: 2018 Masters Tickets have been issued
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 6/20/17 at 3:21 pm
Congrats. Were the lottery winners for just tournament badges selected or have they done practice round tickets too?
re: Tybee Island recommendations
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 6/19/17 at 5:12 pm
I can vouch for AJ's and Huc a Poo's. Both solid.
re: How do you know when it is time to put down your dog?
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 4/18/17 at 4:20 pm
quote:
And yes, stay in the room with him. It's tough, but he'll be scared and you owe it to him to be there to soothe him.
THIS. We were very lucky in that our vet made house calls. So we at least were able to do it in a private place where my dog was comfortable and he didn't have to get nervous about being at the vet. When the time comes and if you feel like that's a good option, it wouldn't hurt to ask. Not sure if these Atlanta vets will do it but our south GA one would.
re: How do you know when it is time to put down your dog?
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 4/18/17 at 4:11 pm
I feel for you man.
A little over a year ago now, my 5 yo lab/weim mix was diagnosed with cancer that had spread all throughout his lymph nodes and he was given 3 months. He really seemed like he was doing well for 2.9 of them. Still got super pumped when I got home, good appetite, went on walks, etc. Only problem was due to the pressure on his bladder is he would pee inside when he never used to. Overall not too bad.
I came back from work one day and he met me at the door really slowly. It became pretty obvious to me something bad had happened while I was gone, maybe some sort of seizure. Could barely walk, no excitement, just really wasn't himself at all. It was the absolute worst because I had no idea how long he had been like that or what had happened. It was late when I got back so it was too late to do anything so I had to do the best I could with him that night and try and make him comfortable. The next day, I had to take him down to my parents house three hours south of Atlanta and we had our family vet put him down.
I know your circumstances different and your dog doesn't have any terminal illness other than a good long life. I got a golden when I was 4 and he lived about 13 years. I say all this because I just remember how terrible I felt and still feel that I let it get to that point. I never did the "big day" for him. I wanted to act like nothing was happening and expected some kind of slow decline. I still don't know when the "right" time is, I think it is still a personal decision, but I know I personally can't let it get to that point again because it devastated me and I felt like a POS. Still feel guilty because he was my best friend.
A little over a year ago now, my 5 yo lab/weim mix was diagnosed with cancer that had spread all throughout his lymph nodes and he was given 3 months. He really seemed like he was doing well for 2.9 of them. Still got super pumped when I got home, good appetite, went on walks, etc. Only problem was due to the pressure on his bladder is he would pee inside when he never used to. Overall not too bad.
I came back from work one day and he met me at the door really slowly. It became pretty obvious to me something bad had happened while I was gone, maybe some sort of seizure. Could barely walk, no excitement, just really wasn't himself at all. It was the absolute worst because I had no idea how long he had been like that or what had happened. It was late when I got back so it was too late to do anything so I had to do the best I could with him that night and try and make him comfortable. The next day, I had to take him down to my parents house three hours south of Atlanta and we had our family vet put him down.
I know your circumstances different and your dog doesn't have any terminal illness other than a good long life. I got a golden when I was 4 and he lived about 13 years. I say all this because I just remember how terrible I felt and still feel that I let it get to that point. I never did the "big day" for him. I wanted to act like nothing was happening and expected some kind of slow decline. I still don't know when the "right" time is, I think it is still a personal decision, but I know I personally can't let it get to that point again because it devastated me and I felt like a POS. Still feel guilty because he was my best friend.
re: Gov. Deal Vetoed House Bill 859 "Campus Carry"
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 5/6/16 at 1:10 pm
I'm not "foaming at the mouth" to say something about the 14th Amendment, you're just wrong on the law. Regardless of how the 14th Amendment was ratified, or the 13th and 15th for that matter, it is the law until repealed. So, yes, the 2nd Amendment does apply to Georgia, just like the protections given to freedom of speech, assembly, quartering troops, freedom against unreasonable search and seizures, etc. You can't personally nullify the 14th Amendment because you don't agree with the circumstances under which it was ratified.
I never said viewed together that the Constitution and amendments are "seamless [and] uncontradictory." But, they are amendments, meaning they alter the original document and become effectively a part of it. They are read together. Just like corollaries to wills and contracts. It may not be semantics in your view and, yes, the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments were drafted in different circumstances, but it doesn't change the fact they have to be read together.
If you say the 14th Amendment is illegitimate, a charade, a fraud, you start arguing what you wish was the case, not what is actually the case. The fact of the matter is, it is in place and has been consistently applied by federal and state courts. Saying the 2nd Amendment only applies to the federal government is simply not true. Georgia cannot bar all guns in its borders anymore than they can muzzle suspected Democrats and socialists from speaking in public.
The Georgia Constitution cannot directly contradict federal substantive law. That's great that Georgia's constitution protects the right to bear arms. But it isn't creating a new right for Georgia citizens, it is reaffirming one already guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment. State constitutions can establish law/policy where that power does not rest in the federal government. Your point regarding the Georgia Constitution would be valid in 1867, but has not been right since 1868 when the 14th Amendment was ratified.
I never said viewed together that the Constitution and amendments are "seamless [and] uncontradictory." But, they are amendments, meaning they alter the original document and become effectively a part of it. They are read together. Just like corollaries to wills and contracts. It may not be semantics in your view and, yes, the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments were drafted in different circumstances, but it doesn't change the fact they have to be read together.
If you say the 14th Amendment is illegitimate, a charade, a fraud, you start arguing what you wish was the case, not what is actually the case. The fact of the matter is, it is in place and has been consistently applied by federal and state courts. Saying the 2nd Amendment only applies to the federal government is simply not true. Georgia cannot bar all guns in its borders anymore than they can muzzle suspected Democrats and socialists from speaking in public.
The Georgia Constitution cannot directly contradict federal substantive law. That's great that Georgia's constitution protects the right to bear arms. But it isn't creating a new right for Georgia citizens, it is reaffirming one already guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment. State constitutions can establish law/policy where that power does not rest in the federal government. Your point regarding the Georgia Constitution would be valid in 1867, but has not been right since 1868 when the 14th Amendment was ratified.
re: Gov. Deal Vetoed House Bill 859 "Campus Carry"
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 5/6/16 at 11:08 am
quote:
The Bill of Rights was attached to the constitution last minute as a compromise to help get the constitution ratified. Many states saw the constitution as the sneaky federal power grab that it was, and so the Bill of Rights was added to try and ease their concerns and con them into ratifying the thing. Every single one of their fears about it of course came true and also a billion others that they couldn't have fathomed.
"Attached" is semantics. They are part of the Constitution. You can't seriously be debating that. It is even more evidence that, as you said, passage of the Bill of Rights were instrumental to getting the Constitution ratified.
quote:
Their having issue or not with gun control in Georgia is irrelevant. Both Jefferson and Madison would have 1,000% agreed that Georgia should decide for themselves about whether to allow citizens to be armed on Georgia campuses. And that it was none of Viriginia's or the Fed's business. These two men were the authors of the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, aka the Principles of '98. They were states rights men. Fierce, unapologetic ones. MOstly.
The fact they recognized that it may be appropriate to curtail 2nd Amendment rights in certain areas is relevant, particularly as to how the 2nd Amendment is interpreted as applies to the Federal government and the states through the Due Process Clause. I also never said that they would not have claimed that Georgia has the right to decide. I was pointing out they would not be critical of the decision.
quote:
Deal is enforcing gun control in Georgia. Please stop trying to sugar coat and rationalize it.
You can characterize this however you want. My ultimate point is that it is not unconstitutional in any way to limit the 2nd Amendment on areas such as college campuses. I don't have to "rationalize" it. This has been the case for the entirety of the existence of UGA. If you choose to disagree with the validity/appropriateness of the Constitution, that's a whole other matter. I confined my opinion as to whether it was constitutional to limit 2nd Amendment rights on college campuses given the set of laws that has been in existence in the US since adoption of the Constitution.
If, as you said, firearms rights are a state issue (which is not necessarily the case b/c if Georgia decided to ban handguns, I'm sure everyone would cry foul as an unconstitutional restriction of 2nd Amendment rights), there is no debate as to whether it is actually allowed to restrict firearms on college campuses.
re: Gov. Deal Vetoed House Bill 859 "Campus Carry"
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 5/6/16 at 8:35 am
I'm definitely not saying that staff/professors, etc. should not be allowed to carry. I'm just saying prohibiting it does not go against the 2nd Amendment. Two separate issues.
re: Gov. Deal Vetoed House Bill 859 "Campus Carry"
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 5/6/16 at 12:20 am
The Bill of Rights are amendments to the Constitution so strictly speaking, they are part of it.
Originalism calls for giving the meaning to the language as meant at the time. Both men's interpretation and understanding would be relevant, Madison as a drafter of the original Constitution and Jefferson as having a hand in the Bill of Rights. I'm not qualified to say what they would agree with, but they had no issue with firearms carry restrictions at UVA. Presumably, they wouldn't with the same restrictions at UGA.
Your argument that the 2nd Amendment as drafted applies only to the Federal government still supports what I said before to the extent they have the ability to limit firearms carry on Federal property. Regardless, the Bill of Rights have been incorporated through the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment and now apply to the states so using an originalist interpretation of the 2nd, allowing limitations on the applicability of the 2nd amendment in sensitive areas, applies equally to the states as of today. If the Bill of Rights had not been incorporated, any state could arguably put all sorts of restrictions on gun ownership since the 2nd Amendment wouldn't apply.
If it is purely a state law issue, which I don't necessarily agree with, my previous point stands in that it is up to Georgia to determine what a sensitive area is. GA has always held that state university campuses are proper areas to limit the carrying of firearms so Deal's veto doesn't abridge existing gun rights.
Either way you look at it, not allowing firearms on university campuses is not a limitation 2nd Amendment rights.
Originalism calls for giving the meaning to the language as meant at the time. Both men's interpretation and understanding would be relevant, Madison as a drafter of the original Constitution and Jefferson as having a hand in the Bill of Rights. I'm not qualified to say what they would agree with, but they had no issue with firearms carry restrictions at UVA. Presumably, they wouldn't with the same restrictions at UGA.
Your argument that the 2nd Amendment as drafted applies only to the Federal government still supports what I said before to the extent they have the ability to limit firearms carry on Federal property. Regardless, the Bill of Rights have been incorporated through the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment and now apply to the states so using an originalist interpretation of the 2nd, allowing limitations on the applicability of the 2nd amendment in sensitive areas, applies equally to the states as of today. If the Bill of Rights had not been incorporated, any state could arguably put all sorts of restrictions on gun ownership since the 2nd Amendment wouldn't apply.
If it is purely a state law issue, which I don't necessarily agree with, my previous point stands in that it is up to Georgia to determine what a sensitive area is. GA has always held that state university campuses are proper areas to limit the carrying of firearms so Deal's veto doesn't abridge existing gun rights.
Either way you look at it, not allowing firearms on university campuses is not a limitation 2nd Amendment rights.
re: Gov. Deal Vetoed House Bill 859 "Campus Carry"
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 5/5/16 at 6:00 pm
What gets lost in this entire thing is that not allowing people to carry on college campuses is not a "restriction" of 2nd Amendment rights, it is a reaffirmation of the status quo that has been in existence at UGA and other state schools since their founding. The 2nd Amendment has always been curtailed on government property, both state and federal, and schools, both primary and colleges. The constitutionality of this has been reaffirmed by Scalia, one of the most conservative justices in recent memory. These restrictions are in place in so many states that are considered conservative, 2nd Amendment-protecting states, including several that we share a border with. What we have seen recently is an expansion by states of the historic parameters of 2nd Amendment rights, a lot of it a good expansion.
But not agreeing to carrying on college campuses is not an attack on 2nd Amendment rights. It is not a precursor to someone coming to take our guns. I think Deal made a good point when he quoted Jefferson and Madison regarding their stance on guns at UVA, two folks responsible for the Constitution. If you adhere to a strict, originalist interpretation of the Constitution, you have to give weight to their stance. They didn't see it as an abridgment of the 2nd Amendment to restrict guns in this aspect.
But not agreeing to carrying on college campuses is not an attack on 2nd Amendment rights. It is not a precursor to someone coming to take our guns. I think Deal made a good point when he quoted Jefferson and Madison regarding their stance on guns at UVA, two folks responsible for the Constitution. If you adhere to a strict, originalist interpretation of the Constitution, you have to give weight to their stance. They didn't see it as an abridgment of the 2nd Amendment to restrict guns in this aspect.
re: Dorm recommendations requested
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 1/12/16 at 10:18 am
While the high rise dorms (Creswell, Brumby, Russell) are pretty old and crappy, that is where all the freshmen live. Especially if the kid is going to be rushing, that is where everyone will be. Purely for the social experience, I recommend those as that is where they will make the most friends.
ECV has more upperclassmen. The other small dorms are worse than the high rise dorms, minus the Meyers area. Those are nice.
ECV has more upperclassmen. The other small dorms are worse than the high rise dorms, minus the Meyers area. Those are nice.
re: 2016 UGA Recruiting Thread (commits, offers, visits, etc.)
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 12/14/15 at 6:30 pm
Same guy in my office that told me about Kirby, no Pruitt etc. that gets his info through his booster friend gave me a couple bits today. Said Eason has confirmed his commitment. Also said that Nauta was a done deal after this past weekend.
re: 2016 UGA Recruiting Thread (commits, offers, visits, etc.)
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 12/2/15 at 1:48 pm
A guy in my office is friends with a big time booster, drinks coffee with him every morning. Today was the first time he had given him any info on the coaching search. Kirby was always first choice. Said that Kirby was given carte blanch with his staff with one exception, no Pruitt. Apparently there is some validity to Pruitt being a "redneck a-hole."
re: is Pruitt gone?
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 11/5/15 at 1:59 pm
He's head coach for Colquitt County in Georgia. #1 ranked high school in 6A.
re: anybody listening to 680?
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 11/5/15 at 10:57 am
Take it for what it is worth, I have a buddy whose friend is working with the team doctors and and he has said that Pruitt is gone and is most likely taking Rocker with him.
re: So can we all agree Greyson Lambert is the front runner for Heisman?
Posted by DawgsOnTopOfYou on 9/24/15 at 1:45 pm
Some might argue that Auburn isn't much better. LF averaged 5.11 yards before contact that game. Credit a bad Auburn defense and a good LSU o-line. Not that hard to have a huge game when you can run halfway to a first down before getting touched.
Popular