TrueSon

i'm just waiting for all crap to break out

tOSU losing (possible with new QB)
Oregon losing (possible, 'Zona already beat them)
FSU losing (possible, Ga Tech's option)
Baylor losing (possible, K-State)

'Bama losing (the most unlikely thing on this list)

quote:

---

LSU makes both of their free throws and you don't get put in that situation

---

this is one of the most overused straw man argument in all of sports.

sure, you don't want to be in the position for the officials to decide it, like they just did. But, that doesn't excuse the terrible officiating.

gotta love the home court advantage blue bloods get. that was atrocious

3 steps? yep. Elbow? nope.

He did use the ball on the dude's face though

quote:

---

KU

---

goodness gracious, at least get it right. if it's not "the school over there" it's "kU."

that's with a lowercase "k" and a capital "U." we don't ever give enough respect to the jayhawkers to capitalize the "k."

i tell you, some people :banghead:

No worries Florida. The officials will make sure you cover the 12. Getting a bit absurd

quote:

---

This is a long thread so there's no way I'm reading all the quibbling back and forth but would this be a good summary.

Mizz fans: nothing to see here
Non-mizz fans: Mizz getting death penalty and you can't spell Unlikely Criminals wihtout UM

Is that about right?

---

Close. The Missouri fans have said that if anyone in the Athletic Department knew they should be fired. If they knew they should have reported it. The football players should be prosecuted if that is still possible. However, the OTL report doesn't support that school officials knew about it. So, what exactly should the Athletic Department have done?

I know my interest has started to wane. I don't like the direction the game is moving in with the new officiating changes. I don't like the 1 and dones. I don't like so many transfers everywhere.

I also know a big part of it for me is that Missouri doesn't have it's traditional basketball rivals. I just don't get nearly as excited for UF, Arky, Kentucky, Ole Miss as I did for kU, I-State, Okie Lite, K-Stat, Texas, etc.

Even in bad years, Missouri and those schools had so much history that the games were entertaining and fun.

I haven't felt that way about football because the competition in the SEC is just a lot better. But, when you go from better competition to worse competition (generally speaking) and lose the rivalries, I just don't care too much.

quote:

---

Welcome to the world of being a Mizzou fan. These way too early pre-season rankings are all about program perceptions. That's why teams like Texas and Notre Dame are always in it even if they're sucking arse and a team like Mizzou is never in it regardless of how deserving. Hoping with time, being in the SEC will change those perceptions.

---

Missouri has been a better program than aTm for a decade now, but they get the love and Missouri doesn't. It could easily take at least 10 years of solid results in the SEC before Missouri gets any love.

Lol sure fire INT if the first guy doesn't bat it away