Started By
Message
re: Voxdawg is Famous
Posted on 2/26/19 at 5:48 pm to SquatchDawg
Posted on 2/26/19 at 5:48 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
So based on my previous post A) this app does pick up on AF1 travel and B) AF1 call sign can be changed
Yes, but you have to know who and when and how it gets done, and if Q0 can even be a call sign, which if I understand it correctly, I don't think it can. I'll have to get into this part when I have more time.
The other thing we have to keep reminding ourselves before we get all convoluted into stuff is what we are even trying to explain.
The whole thing of "Q0" is 100% meaningless in the Q movement. The only way it has any meaning whatsoever to anyone over there is after you do a mental cartwheel and somersault over to your phone and translate the 0 into a +.
To me, if you anyone thinks that's valid then my opinion is you want to believe it too bad. Because otherwise it doesn't make a bit of sense to me. Its the same type of thing Deeprig plays around with for amusement when he does his numb3rs thing on here about UGA football. 27 +3 = 30 so Fromm will win the Heisman
Even so, I think I can still explain how Airforce 1 could never have had anything to do with Q0 callsign though. I will try at least.
1
Posted on 2/26/19 at 7:59 pm to Jefferson Dawg
See though....you’re missing the point.
The point isn’t can you come up with any viable explanation as to this and all of the other so called proofs. Sure you can...anyone can. It’s not an issue of is there some other possible explanation.
It’s an issue of how many coincidences can you dismiss before you have to admit there’s something to it. They can’t all be swamp gas, or ball lightning or weather balloons.
The point isn’t can you come up with any viable explanation as to this and all of the other so called proofs. Sure you can...anyone can. It’s not an issue of is there some other possible explanation.
It’s an issue of how many coincidences can you dismiss before you have to admit there’s something to it. They can’t all be swamp gas, or ball lightning or weather balloons.
Posted on 2/27/19 at 7:34 am to SquatchDawg
quote:
The point isn’t can you come up with any viable explanation as to this and all of the other so called proofs.
It’s an issue of how many coincidences can you dismiss before you have to admit there’s something to it.
And there you have it folks. The REAL definition of what it means to "take the red pill."
Here, gobble one of these.....and come with me to a land where facts don't have to matter.
Facts are LIES!
Coincidence is TRUTH!
Sounding EXACTLY like a cult member means you're NOT in a cult!
Wee!
siyg'e
Posted on 2/27/19 at 9:32 am to Jefferson Dawg
All the mocking and silliness aside...
So you only consider something as being possible only when every other feasible explanation is eliminated?
I must have missed those facts. I just saw a bunch of opinion that then changed over these pages:
“har har....you think you can track aircraft?”
“well you can track them but call signs can’t be changed”
“Oh you can change them but only certain people...and that must me FAKE”
“They have Cat memes..CAT MEMES!”
“yeah that same cat meme twitter account used an app in the CNN article that was used to locate AF1...but here’s my take”
“Cult....red pill...!”
Give me a fact and I’ll consider it.
So you only consider something as being possible only when every other feasible explanation is eliminated?
quote:
Here, gobble one of these.....and come with me to a land where facts don't have to matter.
I must have missed those facts. I just saw a bunch of opinion that then changed over these pages:
“har har....you think you can track aircraft?”
“well you can track them but call signs can’t be changed”
“Oh you can change them but only certain people...and that must me FAKE”
“They have Cat memes..CAT MEMES!”
“yeah that same cat meme twitter account used an app in the CNN article that was used to locate AF1...but here’s my take”
“Cult....red pill...!”
Give me a fact and I’ll consider it.
This post was edited on 2/27/19 at 9:41 am
Posted on 2/27/19 at 11:21 am to SquatchDawg
I still want to know a reasonable explanation for how Q and POTUS have posted to their respective accounts on the same minute, 18 different times, if it's not coordinated.
Either they're working together, or Q needs to hang it up and play the lottery.
Either they're working together, or Q needs to hang it up and play the lottery.
Posted on 2/27/19 at 11:30 am to VoxDawg
You got that Vox...remember...
Obviously some basement anon internet troll has software to intercept the Presidents twitter feed long enough for them to then tweet something in advance...and then release Trumps tweets afterward to the whole world to fool the blind cultists. Of course nobody ever picks up on this because of things.
Why can’t you handle FACTS Vox?
Next question.
quote:
Probably just some sort of glitch where the tweets appear in some places slightly ahead of others.
Obviously some basement anon internet troll has software to intercept the Presidents twitter feed long enough for them to then tweet something in advance...and then release Trumps tweets afterward to the whole world to fool the blind cultists. Of course nobody ever picks up on this because of things.
Why can’t you handle FACTS Vox?
Next question.
This post was edited on 2/27/19 at 11:32 am
Posted on 2/27/19 at 11:46 am to SquatchDawg
I'm good enough at math to realize that there's likely a way to come up with an explanation for pretty much any one proof, in and of itself.
I'm not so bad at math as to think that whatever far-fetched explanation is used to "disprove" any one becomes rules for the universe and simultaneously disproves all others.
This isn't a courtroom. Introducing reasonable doubt doesn't end the discussion.
I'm not so bad at math as to think that whatever far-fetched explanation is used to "disprove" any one becomes rules for the universe and simultaneously disproves all others.
This isn't a courtroom. Introducing reasonable doubt doesn't end the discussion.
Posted on 2/27/19 at 12:13 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
Give me a fact and I’ll consider it.
No, you won't. You're too far gone.
I'll be happy to give facts here for the sane people to read though, so they can have a few laugh at you...
FACTS:
1) The fake troll posting as Q took credit for the Q0 callsign deal and gloated about it to his cult as proof of his existence
2) But, the Q0 callsign deal is a hoax
3) Therefore, anyone believing in Q is a sucker, a moron, or both
EVIDENCE:
-a callsign is simply a name that an air traffic controller speaks over the radio
-broadcasts to aircraft are made on common radio frequencys with many other aircraft listening in
-so the controller uses a specific name (callsign) when giving instructions on these frequencies, so that only the appropriate aircraft responds to it
-the controller knows which callsign to call an aircraft because it is submitted before take-off on a flightplan which stays tagged to each flight
-these callsigns are entered into that required flightplan according to assigned codes from a specific database
-the ICAO database
- like everything else on a formatted flight plan
-with no exceptions
-if a callsign code is not in the database, the flightplan bounces, because it signals that the airplane is not registered, and nobody in the entire airspace system could recognize it or even know what to call the aircraft if it did get past
-and AF1 uses the same airspace system as any other flight, talks to the same controllers
-Examples of callsigns used by controllers:
-Each individual air carrier is assigned a yunique code for filing their flightplans with, each cargo company too, each charter company, different types of military flights, etc
-this is what you sometimes see when using a flight tracker
-you might see a code such as BAW53 flying around
-this is the aircrafts call sign
-but the controllers don't say "Hey, Baw53, hang a left over by that cloud, please"
-No. They say "Speedbird-53, fly heading such n such"
-How did they know to translate "BAW" into "Speedbird"????
-A: Because "BAW" is the ICAO code for callsign "Speedbird" which British Airways has been assigned in the ICAO database to be used for all its flights.
-you might also see something like a "VV544" on the flight tracker
-but the controller will never say "Hey Vee-Vee 544, do a barrel roll"
-No, he says "Navy-544 give us a show, baby"
-Why? Because "VV" is the assigned code in the database for my boys in the Navy.
-Controller sees VV, he knows to use the callsign "Navy"
-Sorry, but there is no Q or Q0 in the database
-Not only that, but to think maybe a Q-operative could of put it in there, is to say the FAA and the entire international airspace system and every controller talking to aircraft , as well as the flight department and pilots for the office of the President and a zillion othre people are in on this Q plot.
-they'd have to be otherwise it can't show up in system as a callsign
-Not only that but, the Q0 theory claims AF1's callsign changed to Q0 mid-flight!
-which would mean the flight crew of AF1 (who is clearly in on Team-Q, eyerolls) radioed to air traffic control and amended the whole airspace system. it's databases, and communications protocols, right then and there
-all of this non-sense and risk all while trying to stay on the down-low so as not to be discovered by the enemy deep-state they are sneaking up on of course just to get a bat-signal out to a bunch of gullible nerds
-ha ha ha ha holy frick i picture Trump knocking on cabin door of AF1, and asking his pilots "Activate the Q0 callsign" and laugh my balls off and then weep because of how ingorant and gullible people are/ FUUUUUUUUUUUUCKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 2/27/19 at 12:15 pm to Jefferson Dawg
You're so pretty...
Posted on 2/27/19 at 12:17 pm to VoxDawg
Sqraukk! Sqraukk!!
Posted on 2/27/19 at 1:27 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
I still want to know a reasonable explanation for how Q and POTUS have posted to their respective accounts on the same minute, 18 different times, if it's not coordinated.
Was it page 1 or page two that I explained this for you?
Posted on 2/27/19 at 1:34 pm to Jefferson Dawg
That’s all great speculation. Link?
Oh...here’s another article where the same app was used to ID AF1 as RCH358.
Does RCH358 show up in your database for a flight to the Middle East? If not you may have it wrong. Or ABC, Wikileaks and this same site that keeps getting it right has it wrong.
LINK
Never mind...found your source...
LINK
Oh...here’s another article where the same app was used to ID AF1 as RCH358.
Does RCH358 show up in your database for a flight to the Middle East? If not you may have it wrong. Or ABC, Wikileaks and this same site that keeps getting it right has it wrong.
LINK
Never mind...found your source...
LINK
This post was edited on 2/27/19 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 2/27/19 at 1:39 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Was it page 1 or page two that I explained this for you?
You're not following. DJT always posts after Q.
ETA - It's worth noting, however that even if it were that POTUS tweets first (Twitter doesn't show seconds), the tweet would have to post, Q gets notification, Q has to log into current Q Research Bread, write something salient, then submit.
Within :59s, assuming DJT's tweet posted at exactly the top of the minute. Any other time and he'd have less time to respond.
Then he'd need to do it 17 more times.
With multiple instances occurring in the same day, including as POTUS was on his flight to Vietnam, this week.
This post was edited on 2/27/19 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 2/27/19 at 1:54 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
That’s all great speculation
Speculation?
Unreal
quote:
Never mind...found your source...
Not my source, prick. But it looks like a good one you might should study.
quote:
Does RCH358 show up in your database for a flight to the Middle East? If not you may have it wrong.
RCH358 was the decoy callsign that Airforce1 used on it's secret trip to Iraq. The f'ing article you linked yourself a few pages ago detailed it.
COntrollers would read the RCH358 call sign as "Reach-358". "Reach" being the callsign for military cargo flights which are very very very common.
This is why it's the perfect cover callsign. The controllers can't see the actual airplane and nobody "tracking" it on airplane nerd twitter pages would bat an eyelash.
***note that they didn't invent some new call sign like Q0, 1) because they can't 2) it would draw attention and foil their palne and 3) be a giant clusterfrick****
The Iraq thing got foiled because someone spotted it physically with binoculars, and then the tracking began, and narrowed down to RCH358.
Posted on 2/27/19 at 2:01 pm to SquatchDawg
It took about 10 mins to find where using the ADS-B transponder you can enter and broadcast custom call signs. They need to match what is in your flight plan or you’ll have callsign mismatch...which is a thing if it doesn’t match your tail number. Not the end of heaven and earth....it’s common.
So are custom callsigns...for all types of things. You can come up with one yourself as long as it matches your flight plan.
The pilot sets this via the transponder....not ATF. It’s used to track flights on a GPS system.
So yes it could be changed midflight to Q0 if someone inside the Trump admin wanted to and no it wouldn’t totally screw the whole airflight network. Also - I doubt the FAA would ground them either.
So about 20% of your post is accurate.
LINK
So are custom callsigns...for all types of things. You can come up with one yourself as long as it matches your flight plan.
The pilot sets this via the transponder....not ATF. It’s used to track flights on a GPS system.
So yes it could be changed midflight to Q0 if someone inside the Trump admin wanted to and no it wouldn’t totally screw the whole airflight network. Also - I doubt the FAA would ground them either.
So about 20% of your post is accurate.
LINK
This post was edited on 2/27/19 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 2/27/19 at 2:06 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
ETA - It's worth noting, however that even if it were that POTUS tweets first (Twitter doesn't show seconds), the tweet would have to post, Q gets notification, Q has to log into current Q Research Bread, write something salient, then submit.
Wrong.
Q already is logged in, has already written something vague regarding the news of the day (which potus tweets about ten times a day), Q just doesn't hit Enter yet. He waits for a tweet from potus that is somewhat related to Q's vague missive. The first one comes in... not related. Wait. The second one comes in.... not related. Third one comes in, it's related! Click enter!
Within seconds, a coincidence.
And he only has to do it 17 more times.
Posted on 2/27/19 at 2:08 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
You're not following. DJT always posts after Q.
I have asked for examples of that, and all I get is extremely vague relationships between the communications. Alot of acrobatics getting them to "link" together into a coincidence.
The only ones that are even remotely "linked" in content are the ones that are "same time" posts.
Posted on 2/27/19 at 2:10 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
You're not following. DJT always posts after Q.
ETA - It's worth noting, however that even if it were that POTUS tweets first (Twitter doesn't show seconds), the tweet would have to post, Q gets notification, Q has to log into current Q Research Bread, write something salient, then submit.
Within :59s, assuming DJT's tweet posted at exactly the top of the minute. Any other time and he'd have less time to respond.
Then he'd need to do it 17 more times.
How do you explain the Kessenstein Brothers that manage to get the first comment on every single Trump Tweet? if those schmucks can do it, with typed out commentary, why the hell can't the Autists pull this shite off?
Posted on 2/27/19 at 2:19 pm to deeprig9
quote:
How do you explain the Kessenstein Brothers that manage to get the first comment on every single Trump Tweet?
The Krassenstein Bros are getting help from Twitter on the back end to ensure that their tweets are tacked at the top of all of DJT's tweets. I've seen discussion about speculation that the faster they respond to their gay-arse batsignal that lets them know Trump has posted something, the bigger their payout.
Same for that surgeon Eugene Gu, dude who is supposed to be a practicing doctor, but pulls the same shite.
There's little doubt that @Jack has zero love for Trump. Given the hardcore censorship that goes on against conservatives on the platform, all bets are off when it comes to all manner of frickery under the hood at Twitter, FB, YouTube, etc.
Posted on 2/27/19 at 2:25 pm to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
Not my source, prick.
Assumed it was when I saw this.
quote:
To the air traffic controllers it appears as BAW29G and when the controllers and pilots communicate via radio, you would hear ‘Speedbird Two Niner Golf ’ on the radio, as Speedbird is the radio call sign for British Airways.
You’re using the same airlines as example. Fair enough.
So they can use a different “decoy” callsign when they want. Gotcha.
Why are you getting so mad? We’ve come a long way from you originally claiming there’s no way AF1 would show up on a flight tracker or that the pilot can’t change their own custom callsign broadcast. That’s progress.
Prick.
Page 10 of 14
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News