Started By
Message
re: Looks like the cocksuckers in DC may have reached a deal
Posted on 10/16/13 at 8:42 pm to Chris_topher
Posted on 10/16/13 at 8:42 pm to Chris_topher
shite sandwich or shite burrito?
Posted on 10/16/13 at 9:33 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
Not sure if I agree with you on this. US GDP includes government spending. If you borrow $100k do you count that as income? I know its popular to compare debt to GDP but it doesn't hold up to reason.
Total domestic GDP also has to fund all private debt as well so if you're going to use this as a benchmark you should include private and federal US debt. That puts your percentage close to 700%. Otherwise your comparing apples to oranges.
But debt service is really the issue here. If rates revert back to the mean we will have to borrow to just to pay our interest as our debt rolls over. That's insolvency.
To me this is a pretty big deal.
That's not the point i was trying to make, i was paring down your point about the "unprecedented" 16+ trillion in debt, the point about outstanding debt as a percentage of GDP isn't to say "we are only at X% of GDP", but rather to explain that in the course of history, these debt levels have been seen before and it was coincidentally immediately after the worst economic depression of the century, which is similar (although to a more severe extent) to our current situation.
Oddly enough we are on the same side of this issue that we are in trouble fiscally and need to make some serious changes (entitlement reform for starters). But i think it's not as ridiculously precarious of a situation as the tea party would have you believe. If it were truly as perilous, then we wouldn't have a AA+ rating with a stable outlook (and yes, i understand we were downgraded).
This post was edited on 10/16/13 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 10/16/13 at 10:56 pm to Chris_topher
I could not be more disgusted at the state of the federal goberment. Completely abysmal.
Posted on 10/16/13 at 11:48 pm to WhopperDawg
quote:
Mitch McConnell got a $2B deal for a dam in KY as part of this new agreement but the Tea Party is the problem
May not have been the best timing, but building stuff like roads and damns is what the government does. I'm not as up in arms about a dam in KY as I am the entitlement/welfare abuse. It's like every time I go to the grocery store somebody's in line in front of me w/ an EBT card buying higher quality food than I have. Working folks are sick and tired of it.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 7:57 am to superdawg
And I would never vote for a tea party member. They have destroyed the gop.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 8:58 am to GregYoureMyBoyBlue
quote:
Oddly enough we are on the same side of this issue
Agreed. I really don't see any solution either. Any way you cut it, somebody is going to have to campaign and win on a platform of taking "stuff" away from people for the overall better good. I don't see that happening without a total collapse.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:55 am to Sanford&MunSon
quote:
They are the NEW gop.
FIFY...
better get on board...the tea party is the peoples answer to the moderate republicans we have been forced to support lately that simply do the same things as the dems just wearing a different hat...frick the establishment GOP...they are just as much a part of the problem as Obama/Reid/Pelosi is...
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:53 pm to SthGADawg
Nah I'm good. I don't subscribe to extremism, but to each his own.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:55 pm to Sanford&MunSon
Nothing "extreme" about going back to Conservative principles. The GOP is moving further and further left, so if a Conservative stays put, they will gradually appear more and more extreme.
I'm not extreme. I'm grounded in reality with a conscience and an understanding of the human condition.
I'm not extreme. I'm grounded in reality with a conscience and an understanding of the human condition.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:57 pm to FooManChoo
Which conservative principles are we referring to?
Posted on 10/17/13 at 1:01 pm to Sanford&MunSon
How about smaller government and a balanced federal budget to start?
Posted on 10/17/13 at 1:03 pm to FooManChoo
That's not extereme at all. Sounds pretty moderate to me. most ppl with a brain can agree to those things.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 1:15 pm to Sanford&MunSon
Most people (apparently) voted for the opposite in the past few elections.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 1:31 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Most people (apparently) voted for the opposite in the past few elections.
^THIS X 1,000,000
Posted on 10/17/13 at 1:45 pm to Sanford&MunSon
quote:
How about smaller government and a balanced federal budget to start?
quote:
That's not extereme at all. Sounds pretty moderate to me. most ppl with a brain can agree to those things.
So, why has government gotten bigger and more intrusive and we haven't had a balanced federal budget since the 1990's. (Which...BTW....was BS too because we weren't funding for the huge future liabilities that everyone knew was coming with Medicare and SS.)
Posted on 10/17/13 at 2:09 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
why has government gotten bigger and more intrusive
cause the establishment GOP and the Dems are cut from the same cloth...they only differ in social issues...not in spending issues...the republicans have held onto their core group of conservatives for years now and it is finally catching up with them...those conservatives are the tea party...we(the tea party)care about fiscal conservatism and limited government...if that is not you...then you might as well be a democrat
Posted on 10/17/13 at 2:34 pm to Sanford&MunSon
quote:
Nah I'm good. I don't subscribe to extremism, but to each his own.
The Democrap party mainstream is further to the extreme than the tea party.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 2:49 pm to Rules
They're about the same in my book.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top


0





