Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/11/21 at 1:49 pm to meansonny
quote:
Thats like your opinion man.
Cook improved pass pro in 2020.
A little more improvement and he can eat into zeus' red zone touches (monken likes to throw in the red zone. Cook is the more versatile back IF he can pass pro equal to white).
Cook has the tangibles for the NFL (shuttle, 40, broad jump).
He fits the current NFL as a weapon in passing and running.
He is going to blow up linebackers on go routes and angle routes for 7 (especially with the other weapons occupying safeties).
He will have a ton of tread left on the tires.
His 2021 NFL audition is going to look for pass protection and more big plays against future NFL defenders like against Bama and Mizzou.
I hope he does blow the draft up and goes first round but I just don’t see it especially in the NFL where LBs have 4.4 speed and push 240lbs.
Posted on 7/11/21 at 1:51 pm to RedFive
quote:
Now take Ringo’s time. Ringo walks away from both of them.
You mean Ringos personal best 10.43 100 meter dash?
It is better than Cooks personal best 10.53.
Is that how you define quickness?
Speed?
Walking away from cook?
Posted on 7/11/21 at 1:57 pm to meansonny
Ringo ran a 4.32 40 Cook 4.51. That’s a good bit faster and Ringo is huge. Did you even watch the game?
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:03 pm to RedFive
quote:
Ringo ran a 4.32 40 Cook 4.51. That’s a good bit faster and Ringo is huge. Did you even watch the game?
So you are saying that ringo is quicker but not faster than cook?
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:04 pm to meansonny
You are a stone cold moron. I get it’s your weak attempt at trolling but you clearly don’t understand the difference. Did you even watch the game?
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:08 pm to RedFive
quote:
Ringo ran a 4.32 40 Cook 4.51.
I don't understand why people look at 40 times to evaluate a player's game speed. Some runners are slow coming out the block then turn it up after the first 15 or 20 yards. 100 and 200 meter times should be more of a factor if you want to evaluate a football player's game speed.
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:10 pm to RedFive
quote:
You are a stone cold moron. I get it’s your weak attempt at trolling but you clearly don’t understand the difference. Did you even watch the game?
When Ringo runs 0.19 faster 40 time but .10 faster 100 time, does that mean cook is faster in the last 60 meters?
Obviously, you are arguing that cook is quicker than white and that ringo is quicker than cook. That can only be your consistent argument.
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:15 pm to RedFive
quote:
Ringo ran a 4.32 40 Cook 4.51. That’s a good bit faster and Ringo is huge. Did you even watch the game?
Why do you continually compare him to a db? Hell,using your metrics Cook "walks away" from our best RB's of the 2000's in the 100... Including Gurley,Chubb,Michel and Swift and all but faster than Swift in the 40
Give an example of a UGA starting RB that had speed (your definition) in 2000's?
This post was edited on 7/11/21 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:18 pm to RD Dawg
What does the 2000’s have to do with anything? Keith Marshall, Walker. Duh.
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:19 pm to RD Dawg
Swift ran a 4.48 at the NFL combine so yet again, you are wrong.
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:20 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
Why do you continually compare him to a db?
Everything is coming out of his arse.
Cook isnt versatile.
Cook cant run up the middle
Cook isnt fast
Cook cant break tackles (they must be arm tackles)
Cook cant make the first man miss
Cook isnt an nfl player
Hell... his convoluted arguments of speed versus quickness is messier than a 2 year old eating spaghetti. There is no argument on his behalf. Only arguing.
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:23 pm to DawgRff
Because the coaches do…..not trying to be rude but it’s the common measuring stick for speed in college and the pros.
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:23 pm to RedFive
quote:
Swift ran a 4.48 at the NFL combine so yet again, you are wrong.
It has already been posted that Swift ran .01 mph faster than cook in 2018 while at UGA.
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:24 pm to meansonny
Just honor the bet when you lose Cpt 14000 Posts.
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:24 pm to RedFive
quote:
Swift ran a 4.48 at the NFL combine so yet again, you are wrong.
Please post where I said he was faster than Swift in the 40.
Cook is faster in the 100 and it isn't up for debate
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:26 pm to meansonny
quote:
Why do you continually compare him to a db? Hell,using your metrics Cook "walks away" from our best RB's of the 2000's in the 100... Including Gurley,Chubb,Michel and Swift and all but faster than Swift in the 40
You must have missed this.
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:26 pm to RedFive
quote:
Because the coaches do
Coaches say that out loud?
Or do you argue that because the 40 time is the NFL Network highlight of the combine?
Ive read the opposite from coaches. The first 10 and 20 yards are the most important for a running back and the shuttle, broad jump, and high jump are more indicative of explosiveness.
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:27 pm to RD Dawg
Who was discussing the 100? You were and no one else. This has been about the 40 since it started. Did you even watch the game?
Posted on 7/11/21 at 2:27 pm to RedFive
Did you miss this?
quote:
Cook isnt versatile.
Cook cant run up the middle
Cook isnt fast
Cook cant break tackles (they must be arm tackles)
Cook cant make the first man miss
Cook isnt an nfl player
Hell... his convoluted arguments of speed versus quickness is messier than a 2 year old eating spaghetti. There is no argument on his behalf. Only arguing.
Page 7 of 8
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News