Started By
Message

re: Anderson

Posted on 11/18/21 at 11:10 am to
Posted by ladyluckUGA
Member since Feb 2014
6432 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 11:10 am to
#2 is the correct answer.

Attention. The answer to every question about women is always Attention.

Trust me.
Posted by FaCubeItches
Soviet Monica, People's Republic CA
Member since Sep 2012
6128 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 11:41 pm to

quote:

Let's be honest...these things very, very, very rarely happen with a no name person.


No, it's reasonably common. It just doesn't get media coverage, because it involves a no-name person.
Posted by FaCubeItches
Soviet Monica, People's Republic CA
Member since Sep 2012
6128 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

Also what if I am hammered....and she is hammered...and we mash uglies...can I claim rape?


Posted by baconwaffle
Houston
Member since Jan 2013
589 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Let's be honest...these things very, very, very rarely happen with a no name person.


I don’t think that’s true. The media never covers cases with no name people, but they do happen. I was a prosecutor earlier in my career and I had dozens of sexual assault cases come across my desk. None involved high profile alleged victims or alleged perpetrators.

I found that rarely, maybe 10% of the time, was the alleged victim a clear liar. 80% of the cases I thought the girl was likely telling the truth but that there was not enough evidence to secure a conviction, and so I didn’t indict. The remaining 10% had enough evidence to take to trial. And most of those were only based on “he-said-she-said” evidence. It’s all about making credibility determinations of the alleged victim and the alleged perp. If the alleged perp makes a bunch of substantively inconsistent statements, it’s evidence he (or she) is a liar and probably guilty.
Posted by FaCubeItches
Soviet Monica, People's Republic CA
Member since Sep 2012
6128 posts
Posted on 11/20/21 at 2:48 am to
Another decent rule of thumb for evaluating a case: the innocent dispute the charge; the guilty dispute the evidence. Not 100% accurate, but helpful.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter