Started By
Message
Posted on 11/18/21 at 11:41 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
Let's be honest...these things very, very, very rarely happen with a no name person.
No, it's reasonably common. It just doesn't get media coverage, because it involves a no-name person.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 11:44 pm to Sandwich
quote:
Also what if I am hammered....and she is hammered...and we mash uglies...can I claim rape?

Posted on 11/19/21 at 6:27 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
Let's be honest...these things very, very, very rarely happen with a no name person.
I don’t think that’s true. The media never covers cases with no name people, but they do happen. I was a prosecutor earlier in my career and I had dozens of sexual assault cases come across my desk. None involved high profile alleged victims or alleged perpetrators.
I found that rarely, maybe 10% of the time, was the alleged victim a clear liar. 80% of the cases I thought the girl was likely telling the truth but that there was not enough evidence to secure a conviction, and so I didn’t indict. The remaining 10% had enough evidence to take to trial. And most of those were only based on “he-said-she-said” evidence. It’s all about making credibility determinations of the alleged victim and the alleged perp. If the alleged perp makes a bunch of substantively inconsistent statements, it’s evidence he (or she) is a liar and probably guilty.
Posted on 11/20/21 at 2:48 am to baconwaffle
Another decent rule of thumb for evaluating a case: the innocent dispute the charge; the guilty dispute the evidence. Not 100% accurate, but helpful.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top

0





