Started By
Message

Wikipedia New Page on OBSESSION. Please add to the content.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 11:56 am
Posted on 2/4/14 at 11:56 am
Randolph Duke (obsession)
Thanks Ranters. Let us keep the world informed of the serious condition.
Thank you for making Wikipedia educational and informative for future generations.
Thanks Ranters. Let us keep the world informed of the serious condition.

Thank you for making Wikipedia educational and informative for future generations.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 11:56 am to KaiserSoze99
And please spread this to other sites. Get the word out about this serious condition.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 12:23 pm to KaiserSoze99
You're going to have to provide links and sources, or the reddit clowns will take it down.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 12:23 pm to KaiserSoze99
He is 51 year old Charles M Satterfield, a divorced, unemployed 1984 UT grad who lives in an apartment on the south side of Houston.
I won't post his address for fear of some crazy Ag doing something he shouldn't.
I won't post his address for fear of some crazy Ag doing something he shouldn't.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 12:25 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I will however posts pics if and when they are found
Posted on 2/4/14 at 12:34 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
How long until the page comes down?
Posted on 2/4/14 at 12:36 pm to KaiserSoze99
Never mind. It's already down.
quote:
Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. TheLongTone (talk) 18:25, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
This post was edited on 2/4/14 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:57 pm to KaiserSoze99
Not worth it. Let it go.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 3:21 pm to KaiserSoze99
Kaiser, trolling the Longhorns version of Harvey Updyke on Wikipedia is ultimately counterproductive. We shouldn't be doing anything on that site that would make him seem reasonable by comparison. Instead, you should be making comments like this:
quote:It would also be helpful to point out where Randolph Duke uses himself as a source.
I disagree with the suggested rewrite for several reasons. First, as one time only references in two literary journals, the Iowa or Minnesota uses of the phrase never appeared to catch on or ever have any significane to the two schools. As such, I think it is reasonable to mention them within the history section, but there is not enough relevance to include them in the introduction portion of the article. Second, I don't believe that the Minnesota article refers to an individual as the 12th Man as is suggested. Instead it appears that the reference is instead to a group... that group being the cheerleader. This is different from the usage by A&M in 1922 when it was used to reference a specific individual, E. King Gill. Finally, I believe that the current phrasing regarding A&M's use is more proper than the suggested rewrite, as the rewrtie does not include Texas A&M being the first to use the "12th Man" as opposed to "Twelfth Man" term, because it does not mention that Texas A&M was the first to use the term to reference a single individual, and because it does not note that Texas A&M has used that term to reference it's students since that game in 1922.

Posted on 2/4/14 at 3:27 pm to KaiserSoze99
Anybody get a screenshot or a summary of what I missed? 

Posted on 2/4/14 at 3:28 pm to Houston Summit
quote:
Anybody get a screenshot or a summary of what I missed?
You didn't miss anything.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 4:49 pm to KaiserSoze99
ain't nobody got time for that.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 10:26 am to Roger Klarvin
Charles is a certifiable lunatic. At any time of day you can see that all he does is go through A&M websites and see if his name is mentioned. He then goes back to hornsports and shaggy and reports. I do believe a straight jacket maybe in order.
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top
