Do we give Ben Howland a look?

Why not?

This isn't a broken record. We all know that the ONLY way that Hyman makes a move this offseason is if there is a can't miss guy available now.

Not only that, but Kennedy's buyout is $500,000 regardless of how early in the contract he is terminated. Howland's buyout, on the other hand, is close to $3 Million.

Compared to being fired after winning the PAC 12 regular season title and recruiting the #1 player in the country, our expectations would be MORE than reasonable.

The implied question: "Is Ben Howland that guy?"

Case in point: Notre Dame's firing of Tyrone Willingham as a preemptive measure to try to get Urban Meyer.

yes, you talking about firing BK yet again is not a broken record.

How can you not? Getting him to move from Westwood to College Station might take some $$$$ though. Didn't he take UCLA to multiple Final Fours?

quote:

---

Getting him to move from Westwood to College Station might take some $$$$ though. Didn't he take UCLA to multiple Final Fours?

---

UCLA just fired him, so I don't think it would be hard for him to leave Westwood.

well, College Station is nice but it's not as nice as that part of L.A... just saying...

plus, there might be basketball schools interested in him that are in much better locations.

quote:

---

Howland is a nutjob. He has won but he is a really, really strange guy that is very unlikely to be a good fit at A&M. There is a lot of Fran type risk with him.

---

Can't even remotely compare Franchione and Howland.

Franchione has coached 17 seasons of 1-A football. In those 17 seasons, he has:

Won 9 or more games 4 times
Been over .500 10 times
Been to a bowl 8 times (won 4)

Clearly you didn't forget the infamous secret newsletter.

Howland, on the other hand, took Northern Arizona to the NCAA tournament, Pittsburgh to the Sweet 16 twice, and UCLA to the Final Four three straight seasons.

Franchione was the epitome of ARROGANCE, not a nut.

If Howland's a bit of a nut...he'd fit right in, as the last truly successful coach we had was Billy Gillispie.

If Howland is Gillispie without the alcoholism and the "creeping on girls 20 years younger than him"-ism, I'll take that in a heartbeat.

Seriously, Ben Howland and Tubby Smith get fired for only making it to the 2nd and 3rd rounds respectively after fixing the problems of their predecessors and Kennedy sticks around after unfixing the results of HIS predecessors?

Speaking of twisting reality:

Minnesota, prior to Tubby Smith's arrival was recovering from sanctions resulting from academic fraud that almost wiped out their basketball program. They had been to the tournament ONCE between 1999 and when Smith arrived in 2007 (4 NIT appearances). In the six years that Smith was there, Minnesota went to the postseason five times (3 NCAA tournament appearances). Took Minnesota to the postseason in year 2

UCLA, prior to Ben Howland's arrival, hadn't made it past the Sweet 16 in 6 seasons. Howland took them to three straight final fours and took them to the title game in year 2.

Texas A&M, prior to Billy Kennedy's arrival had made the NCAA tournament six straight seasons, and a postseason tournament SEVEN straight seasons. In all but one year, they had gone at least 1 game deep in those respective tournaments. They haven't been to the postseason since.

quote:

---

Howland didn't make it to the title game in his second year. That was his third. His first two years at UCLA they went a combined 29-28. Never mind that comparing UCLA basketball to A&M is dumb to begin with

---

How about actually comparing the coaches themselves instead of the program. Right now, there is no evidence that year 3 of the Billy Kennedy error will be any better than year 2...not from his history. Whereas the historical evidence was very strong that both Ben Howland and Tubby Smith knew what they were doing.