Started By
Message
re: Ags vs Bears 11/12/16
Posted on 11/12/16 at 2:42 pm to Roger Klarvin
Posted on 11/12/16 at 2:42 pm to Roger Klarvin
Knight was never known as a great passer, but he held his own and was consistently inconsistent (if that makes sense). You knew what you had with Knight every week and his running ability was always the difference maker. It's no secret Hubenack is a better passer, but he's not a great passer either. Hubenack takes away the read option threat that allowed us to beat Arkansas. Doubt he would have ran for all those TDs Knight ran for during the Arkansas game.
If he lights up Ole Miss, it won't mean squat. But if he can do damage on the ground, then you could have an argument, but don't think he fools anyone. Dude's just a little slow.
If he lights up Ole Miss, it won't mean squat. But if he can do damage on the ground, then you could have an argument, but don't think he fools anyone. Dude's just a little slow.
Posted on 11/12/16 at 4:06 pm to Texas Weazel
Knight was the smart choice to start the season. But the offensive line may respond betternow that they have some games in them. Hubes might be the man for the job now.
Posted on 11/12/16 at 5:40 pm to Roger Klarvin
No just logical
For a man of science Roger you apply emotion over logic way too frequently
For a man of science Roger you apply emotion over logic way too frequently
Posted on 11/12/16 at 5:53 pm to Old Sarge
If Hubenak was the significantly better passer all along, it's perfectly logical to question the decision to play the least accurate A&M QB since the early 90s.
Posted on 11/12/16 at 6:03 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
Knight was the smart choice to start the season. But the offensive line may respond betternow that they have some games in them. Hubes might be the man for the job now.
That's one way to (hope for) look at it. Our center just has to get his shite together.
Posted on 11/12/16 at 6:04 pm to Roger Klarvin
Roger, we all assumed we would need a qb that was very good at scrambling before the season started since we anticipated not being very good at a. Protecting the passer and b. Weak at the running back position
Things that have changed
Our offensive line has more experience and we have proven talented backs
Things that have changed
Our offensive line has more experience and we have proven talented backs
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top

1






