5
.png)
Started By
Message
re: Ole miss flips two MSU commits (Armani Linton & Jay Johnson)
Posted on 6/7/14 at 9:44 pm to Whereisomaha
Posted on 6/7/14 at 9:44 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
I do remember. And then the word came out on what kind of kid he is, I'm not going there, but even your beloved Elite Dawgs said they didn't want him. But while you're talking shite you want to add another year to the bet?
Should probably just make it permanent.
Sure, sounds like a great idea.
But David Johnson said it was "all even" last week...
This post was edited on 6/7/14 at 9:46 pm
Posted on 6/7/14 at 9:47 pm to engie
quote:
David Johnson
that's your problem right there
That guy is a tool
Posted on 6/7/14 at 9:53 pm to engie
quote:
But David Johnson said it was "all even" last week...
Did he? Odd you would know that but someone like me who is a "supporter" of DJ didn't. I know he told every reported it was even a few weeks ago so I don't know why that would be a bad statement.
This post was edited on 6/7/14 at 10:15 pm
Posted on 6/7/14 at 9:55 pm to engie
Good deal. Permanent ban bet.
Engie gets so excited just by his top 8 having 5 points more than our total 8. It's going to be a long season for you
Engie gets so excited just by his top 8 having 5 points more than our total 8. It's going to be a long season for you
This post was edited on 6/8/14 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 6/7/14 at 11:16 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
Good deal. Permanent ban bet.
quote:
Engie
quote:
Whereisomaha
Now this is where you park a mother fricking car fellas.
Posted on 6/8/14 at 9:14 am to DynastyDawg
So what's the bet? Who has the best 2014 season or best recruiting ranking come Feb?
Posted on 6/8/14 at 9:33 am to Klongdawg
WIO / engie ban bet. Must be June
Posted on 6/8/14 at 10:06 am to Whereisomaha
quote:
Would I ever or have I ever said that we pushed out commitments that commit to a equal or better recruiting program to make room for better players? On what basis am I like Engie besides I love to argue? He thinks Elite Dawgs is a better site than this one. Do you believe that I am as big a homer that I would support the ranting a of say the spirit board?
I don't know what y'all do or say. I rarely read any of the dumb shite y'all post.
Y'all are the same poster though. 20 pages back and forth arguing over some 16 and 17 year old kids. The only two posters that routinely do this honestly. It gives me the sad this means so much to y'all.
This post was edited on 6/8/14 at 10:07 am
Posted on 6/8/14 at 10:21 am to Requiem For A Dawg
I fricking hate these threads.
Posted on 6/8/14 at 10:40 am to Requiem For A Dawg
We aren't arguing over kids, but programs. There isn't a single argument saying this kids likes us better because blah blah blah. This argument is about Mullen stop recruiting kids that Freeze wanted. You asked why OM posters stand behind me while bashing Engie. I explained how we were different and gave you your answer. Why else would most dislike Engie and not me if that weren't the case?
Let this thread die already
Let this thread die already
This post was edited on 6/8/14 at 10:41 am
Posted on 6/8/14 at 11:06 am to Whereisomaha
Kill yourself 
Posted on 6/8/14 at 3:52 pm to engie
Engie... I wonder if we can change the terms of our bet. When I said top 20 vs top 20 I assumed that we would have 20 commits but we are only going to lose 15 (Yancy says) or 16 (what the roster says) scholarship seniors meaning it will be very unlikely to get to 20 commits.
The point of the bet is even stronger if that is the case because we have even fewer scholarships to give, thus taking kids y'all don't want is even a bigger sign that your class is superior to ours. I'd like to propose that we use whatever number of total commitments OM has, whether that is your top 16, 18, or whatever. Like I said earlier it covers the point of the bet even more if the number is under 20.
I will not bitch if you do not agree with the change because a bet is a bet, an if I ignorantly agreed to a bad one then that's on me. If you do agree I will agree to just a 6 month ban of yourself, but still take the life time ban if I lose. If you don't then it is still a life long ban for both of us. Keep in mind, that it's not unusual for teams to over sign their amount of available scholarships. Think about it
The point of the bet is even stronger if that is the case because we have even fewer scholarships to give, thus taking kids y'all don't want is even a bigger sign that your class is superior to ours. I'd like to propose that we use whatever number of total commitments OM has, whether that is your top 16, 18, or whatever. Like I said earlier it covers the point of the bet even more if the number is under 20.
I will not bitch if you do not agree with the change because a bet is a bet, an if I ignorantly agreed to a bad one then that's on me. If you do agree I will agree to just a 6 month ban of yourself, but still take the life time ban if I lose. If you don't then it is still a life long ban for both of us. Keep in mind, that it's not unusual for teams to over sign their amount of available scholarships. Think about it
This post was edited on 6/8/14 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:40 am to engie
quote:
Andddd another 4* in the boat. Thought you had the lead for him? Remember THAT argument?
Gonna be lonely without you around here.
You bragging about snagging Dear? Don't you find it odd that he committed so quickly to MSU after we flipped Linton/Johnson? You act like that one little yellow star makes a player worlds better. There is a reason Dear hasn't been recruited heavily by any school.
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:41 am to engie
quote:
engie
You going to take me up on the life ban bet?
Posted on 6/9/14 at 9:19 am to REBEL5 AC
Ironic how all the msu fans started star gazing this year.
Crootin satrz dont matter!
Crootin satrz dont matter!
Posted on 6/9/14 at 11:04 am to REBEL5 AC
quote:
You act like that one little yellow star makes a player worlds better.
Waaaiiiittttt a minute....
Posted on 6/9/14 at 11:21 am to REBEL5 AC
You don't have a ban bet on the table. And no -- because you are already a bad alter.
Posted on 6/9/14 at 11:23 am to REBEL5 AC
Yeah there is. It's because he's been locked up for MSU.
"OM doesn't want" = "Proceeds to kick their arse 3 or 4 times during career"
Posted on 6/9/14 at 11:29 am to engie
Yay or nay on my changes to bet?
Posted on 6/9/14 at 11:40 am to Whereisomaha
I'm still considering it.
It's funny that you refer to me as a blind, homer MSU fan -- and go and make a bet that was obvious from the drop was a dumb one based on numbers alone. And if you'll review, what I agreed to was an actual point total basically counting every recruit identically, not the 24/7 bell's curve, which minimally penalizes having fewer recruits.
Nevermind that in the method you framed it, you don't get to cull anyone and must count every "diamond" -- while I won't have to count MSU's 7-10 worst recruits...
It's funny that you refer to me as a blind, homer MSU fan -- and go and make a bet that was obvious from the drop was a dumb one based on numbers alone. And if you'll review, what I agreed to was an actual point total basically counting every recruit identically, not the 24/7 bell's curve, which minimally penalizes having fewer recruits.
Nevermind that in the method you framed it, you don't get to cull anyone and must count every "diamond" -- while I won't have to count MSU's 7-10 worst recruits...
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News