Started By
Message

re: NIL or Transfer Portal.. Which one is worse for college football??

Posted on 6/20/22 at 8:36 pm to
Posted by DawgRff
Snellville Ga
Member since Jul 2012
6309 posts
Posted on 6/20/22 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

I don’t dislike either one in theory.


You dont say........
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30313 posts
Posted on 6/21/22 at 9:27 am to
The transfer portal needs regulating immediately. Go back to the 1 yr sit out rule for all transfers.

That one element would quell NIL involvement with players running to the highest bidder. It would also relieve a coaching staff from having to re-recruit their entire roster every year.
Posted by Merritt
Member since Jan 2022
62 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 8:34 am to
Free agency without a salary cap is pretty bad, though even in professional sports there are contracts, and thus some consequences.

The current system is a disservice to these young adults, money with no real obligation is not how the rest of life will work out.

If this is the path going forward there will have to be some limitations put into place, a salary cap, transfer restrictions or contracts, or a combination these. The current trajectory will destroy the sport and leave an intramural-like D3 type game in its wake.
Posted by deputyfife
Member since Dec 2013
1131 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:02 pm to
NIL by far.
These are educational institutions. Sports on campus started as club activities. For bragging purposes, ringers started getting paid to play for the clubs. Then they decided amateur status should mean no pay, but not really for the schools that wanted it most.
Now the school teams are simply NFL developmental leagues veneered with a thin coating of school afiliation.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter