Started By
Message
Composite ranking...Is this still the standard?
Posted on 6/17/20 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 6/17/20 at 8:08 pm
Is this still the standard or are we just going with 247 rankings now.
Doesn’t seem to be a whole lot of effort put into the ESPN rankings and some of the Rivals rankings just make no sense whatsoever
Doesn’t seem to be a whole lot of effort put into the ESPN rankings and some of the Rivals rankings just make no sense whatsoever
This post was edited on 6/25/20 at 7:57 am
5
Posted on 6/17/20 at 8:17 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
Doesn’t seem to be a whole lot of effort put into the ESPN rankings and some of the Rivals rankings just make no sense whatsoever
Based on what?
Posted on 6/17/20 at 8:38 pm to DawgRff
Maybe this is just my personal experience but they seem to be way off from the other two quite a bit.
I think they have a significantly smaller staff than the other two services also
I think they have a significantly smaller staff than the other two services also
Posted on 6/17/20 at 8:59 pm to JesusQuintana
Rankings this cycle are completely irrelevant imo. 247 guys have basically admitted that they’re using input from coaches to rank these guys, and Rivals is doing what they usually do.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 9:15 am to sand mountainDvalues
Rankings are stupid because ratings of kids aren't any better then when all you got was what color chip they were in USA today.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 9:16 am to JesusQuintana
You’re not new here so surely you realize folks just use the ranking that shows their guy the highest and then we proceed to go through the process each time of explaining it’s not the composite. Wash, rinse, repeat every time.
This post was edited on 6/18/20 at 9:36 am
Posted on 6/18/20 at 2:03 pm to JesusQuintana
I always use the composite ranking. Has always seemed like the most fair to me, though I'm no expert on recruiting rankings.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 2:38 pm to JesusQuintana
You use whichever one has the highest ranking for your guy
Posted on 6/18/20 at 4:32 pm to jumbo
Ha, I like that better
Posted on 6/19/20 at 9:30 am to Miznoz
quote:
Rankings are stupid because ratings of kids aren't any better then when all you got was what color chip they were in USA today.
Alabama has rated best in the recruiting ranks in the Saban era and has also won the most games and most national championships. It is not a coincidence.
Posted on 6/19/20 at 5:38 pm to DawgRff
Ugh Xvavier Henderson ranking on rivals is just if u cant see the 5* talent he's a bigger version of CJ who plays
Also Ethan Pouncey downed to a 3* for not playing most his sr yr after 21 PBU's and 8 int in 12 gamew as a jr a bit much if u ask me.for an elite talent from another elite bloodline
I bet Jordan Pouncey even balls out at UF idc what he did at Texas same for Shorter and Lingard bet it all hell Cox too and Reese too
Also Ethan Pouncey downed to a 3* for not playing most his sr yr after 21 PBU's and 8 int in 12 gamew as a jr a bit much if u ask me.for an elite talent from another elite bloodline
I bet Jordan Pouncey even balls out at UF idc what he did at Texas same for Shorter and Lingard bet it all hell Cox too and Reese too
This post was edited on 6/19/20 at 5:39 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News