Started By
Message
re: 2013 Auburn Recruiting Thread: Commits, Visits, Hot Prospects, etc...
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:43 pm to auburnu008
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:43 pm to auburnu008
Fixed
0
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:44 pm to auburnu008
I'm assuming he means they "will not" consider offering him until winter.
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:45 pm to Stanky Legg
Correct. I fixed my OP
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:46 pm to TheJones
That seems to be pretty last-minute if he's gonna be an EE
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:47 pm to TheJones
What's up with that? I couldn't imagine him going to SC after that kind of news
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:47 pm to TheJones
Having 15 scholarships is really going to take its toll on them before long.
Won't see the affects for a couple of years, but they will arise nonetheless.
Won't see the affects for a couple of years, but they will arise nonetheless.
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:48 pm to TheSandman
Well rodgers will be an AU commit for a while
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:48 pm to TheSandman
Correct, Sandman
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:48 pm to TheSandman
Didn't someone say today or tonight that he has decided to commit soon? Think this might be related? Fingers crossed.....
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:48 pm to TheSandman
quote:
That seems to be pretty last-minute if he's gonna be an EE
I would assume they want to see how their class fills out. If they think they are going to miss on a number of guys, they'll extend an offer.
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:50 pm to TheJones
quote:Stupid move on their part, IMO. He looked great at the Rivals Challenge and actually did well against Dee Liner. I'd be glad to take him, and it might help us with Kenny Bigelow.
Was just old that USCw will not consider offering K. Rodgers until winter. TIFWIW
Good news.
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:59 pm to TheJones
quote:
Correct, Sandman
Just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something
Posted on 6/26/12 at 10:59 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
Stupid move on their part, IMO. He looked great at the Rivals Challenge
Not if they have more pressing needs. I mean, only 15 schollys? Ouch.
Posted on 6/26/12 at 11:01 pm to TheSandman
quote:Good point. 4 years, and that only 60 players, not counting attrition. I bet they have a bunch of walk-ons that contribute during practice.
Not if they have more pressing needs. I mean, only 15 schollys? Ouch.
Posted on 6/26/12 at 11:06 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
Good point. 4 years, and that only 60 players, not counting attrition
The sanctions are only for three years.
They'll be down to 55 scholarship players, minus attrition, at the end of the sanctions.
I don't care how good those 55 players are, that's going to be difficult to manage.
Posted on 6/26/12 at 11:11 pm to Stanky Legg
I was just throwing a random number out, but I see your point. It's something serious. I don't think a good team would survive, in the SEC, if they only had 15 schollies a year.
Posted on 6/26/12 at 11:14 pm to Stanky Legg
At this rate there is no possible way I can make it to signing day 
Posted on 6/26/12 at 11:15 pm to DecaturAU
quote:
At this rate there is no possible way I can make it to signing day
I doubt I'll make it to football season tbh
Posted on 6/26/12 at 11:16 pm to TTsTowel
You can't survive in any conference with 55 players. That's 30 players that you wanted that your rivals now have.
Not only have you depleted your roster, and basically insured that you had to hit on almost 100% of your evaluations, you'd improved the roster of your rivals.
Not only have you depleted your roster, and basically insured that you had to hit on almost 100% of your evaluations, you'd improved the roster of your rivals.
Posted on 6/26/12 at 11:19 pm to Stanky Legg
It's amazing that high school boys have the ability to break my heart
Page 310 of 601
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News