Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/8/24 at 8:58 am to A12 Oxcart
quote:
No, don't lose to two shitty teams and get curb stomped by one of them. There's a difference.
No, it isn’t. Or USC would be in. They didn’t lose to a team outside the top 15. SMU lost to the only 2 top 25 teams they played, and barely beat Duke after turning the ball over 6 times. Your hate for Bama is clouding your judgement…put in USC if you hate Bama, but choosing SMU will ruin non-conference scheduling.
Edit: I don’t really count the LSU loss that was “given” to USC. USC would destroy SMU
This post was edited on 12/8/24 at 9:00 am
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:00 am to Cheer
It’s fine because all you have to say in the end is that if you wouldn’t have lost multiple games, you wouldn’t be in the position to miss out. It’s a lot better than 3 teams going undefeated and trying to decide which Auburn should be left out.
This post was edited on 12/8/24 at 9:01 am
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:00 am to BamaBravesPackers
Damn you’re pulling for the covks
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:02 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Would just piss off the 25th team...
We have proven that for every 4 teams selected, 1 is pissed.
If this holds true, selecting 12 should piss off 3. Yep. Holds true.
So selecting 24 would piss off 6.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:45 am to bodask42
quote:
But I would hope unbiased folks woild acknowledge how silly it is to put SMU in
I would hope that you would acknowledge how silly it is to be debating Alabama vs SMU for the 12th seed.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News